DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, AND OTHER RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS 3.1 The Contractor certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its subcontractors:
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters Primary Covered Transactions
Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, and Other Responsibility Matters – Primary Covered Transactions The Firm certifies to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals:
Compliance with State and Other Laws The CONSULTANT specifically agrees that in performance of the services herein enumerated by it or by a subcontractor or anyone acting in behalf of either, that it or they will exercise the standard of care to comply with state, federal and local statutes, ordinances, and regulations applicable to the performance of this Agreement.
GOVERNING LAW AND OTHER REPRESENTATIONS: DIR Customer [ ] Unit of Texas Local Government hereby certifying that is has statutory authority to perform its duties hereunder pursuant to Chapter , Texas Code. [X] Non-Texas State agency or unit of local government of another state hereby certifying that it has statutory authority to enter in to this Interlocal Agreement and perform its duties hereunder pursuant to the Colorado Judicial Department Purchasing Fiscal Rules.
System Protection and Other Control Requirements Developer shall provide, install and test relay protection systems at the Merchant Transmission Facility to interface with those systems installed by Connecting Transmission Owner at the West 49th Street Substation.
Definitions and Other Provisions of General Application SECTION 101.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST AND OTHER RULES OR REGULATIONS 6.1 Prior to executing the Agreement, Employee shall make a declaration to Manitoba as to actual or potential conflict of interest as required by the Conflict of Interest Guidelines, policies and legislation of Manitoba.
LEGISLATIVE ACTS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS Subject: Agreement between the European Union and the government of the Republic of Turkey on certain aspects of Air Services 18268/11 DG C I C KSM/kst EN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE EUROPEAN UNION AND THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY ON CERTAIN ASPECTS OF AIR SERVICES THE EUROPEAN UNION, (hereinafter "the Union") of the one part, and THE GOVERNMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF TURKEY (hereinafter "Turkey") of the other part (hereinafter "the Parties"), HAVING REGARD to Council Decision 64/732/EEC of 23 December 1963 on the conclusion of the Agreement establishing an Association between the European Economic Community and Turkey, and Decision 1/95 of the EC-Turkey Association Council of 22 December 1995 on implementing the final phase of the Customs Union, which constitute the legal basis of Turkey's association with the EU, HAVING REGARD to the adoption at the Luxembourg Intergovernmental Conference of 3 October 2005 of the Negotiating Framework and in particular Articles 1, 2 and 6 thereof, HAVING REGARD to Council Decision 2008/157/EC of 18 February 2008 on the principles, priorities and conditions contained in the Accession Partnership with the Republic of Turkey and the 2008 National Programme of Turkey for the Adoption of the EU Acquis in which Turkey accepts and is prepared to implement the full "Acquis" in relation to air transport matters upon accession to the EU, NOTING that, until such accession, this Agreement will open the way towards Turkey's participation in Union civil aviation projects, in particular the Single European Sky, in order to assist Turkey in the adoption of the "Acquis", NOTING that the European Court of Justice has found that certain provisions of bilateral air services agreements concluded between several Member States of the Union and third countries are incompatible with Union law, NOTING that bilateral air services agreements concluded between several Member States of the Union and Turkey contain similar provisions and that there is an obligation on Member States to take all appropriate steps to eliminate incompatibilities between such agreements and Union law, NOTING that the Union has exclusive competence with respect to several aspects that may be included in bilateral air services agreements between Member States of the Union and third countries, NOTING that under Union law Community air carriers established in a Member State have the right to non-discriminatory access to air routes between the Member States of the Union and third countries, HAVING REGARD to the agreements between the Union and certain third countries providing for the possibility for the nationals of such third countries to acquire ownership in air carriers licensed in accordance with Union law, RECOGNISING that consistency between Union law and the provisions of the bilateral air services agreements between Member States of the Union and Turkey will provide a sound legal basis for air services between the Union and Turkey and preserve the continuity of such air services, NOTING that under Union law air carriers may not, in principle, conclude agreements which may affect trade between Member States of the Union and which have as their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition, RECOGNISING that provisions in bilateral air services agreements concluded between Member States of the Union and Turkey which i) require or favour the adoption of agreements between undertakings, decisions by associations of undertakings or concerted practices that prevent, distort or restrict competition between air carriers on the relevant routes; or ii) reinforce the effects of any such agreement, decision or concerted practice; or iii) delegate to air carriers or other private economic operators the responsibility for taking measures that prevent, distort or restrict competition between air carriers on the relevant routes may render ineffective the competition rules applicable to undertakings, NOTING that it is not a purpose of the Union, as part of these negotiations, to increase the total volume of air traffic between the Union and Turkey, to affect the balance between Community air carriers and air carriers of Turkey, or to negotiate amendments to the provisions of existing bilateral air services agreements concerning traffic rights, NOTING that nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to confer on the air carrier of a Designating Member State the privilege of taking advantage of unused frequencies between Turkey and other Member States before the procedures regarding designation have been duly completed between the designating Member State and Turkey, NOTING that the principle of fair and equal opportunity laid down in the relevant bilateral Air Services Agreements for Turkish and Community air carriers will be fully respected, HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
Indemnity Limitation with TIPS Members Texas and other states restrict by law or state Constitution the ability of a governmental entity to indemnify others. TIPS requires that any contract entered into between a vendor and TIPS or a TIPS Member as a result of an award under this Solicitation limit the requirement that the Customer indemnify the Vendor by either eliminating any such indemnity requirement clauses in any agreements, contracts or other binding documents OR by prefacing all indemnity clauses required of TIPS or the TIPS Member entity with the following: "To the extent permitted by the laws or the Constitution of the state where the customer resides, ". Agreement is a required condition to award of a contract resulting from this Solicitation. Agreed
