Burden of Proof and Mitigation Sample Clauses

Burden of Proof and Mitigation. The Developer shall bear the burden of proof in establishing the occurrence of a Supervening Event and the entitlement to relief based thereon, and shall demonstrate that the Developer complied with its mitigation obligations under Section 23.6 (General Duty to Mitigate).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Burden of Proof and Mitigation. The Contractor shall bear the burden of proof in establishing the occurrence of an Uncontrollable Circumstance and the entitlement to relief based thereon, and shall demonstrate that the Contractor complied with its mitigation obligations under Section 18.7 (General Duty to Mitigate).
Burden of Proof and Mitigation. Project Company bears the burden of proof in establishing the occurrence of a Relevant Event and the entitlement to, and amount of, relief for such Relevant Event, including demonstrating that Project Company complied with its mitigation obligations under Section 28.1.
Burden of Proof and Mitigation. The DBOM Contractor shall bear the burden of proof in establishing the occurrence of an Uncontrollable Circumstance and the entitlement to relief based thereon, and shall demonstrate that the DBOM Contractor complied with its mitigation obligations under Section 22.10 (General Duty to Mitigate).
Burden of Proof and Mitigation. The Company shall bear the burden of proof in establishing the occurrence of an Uncontrollable Circumstance and the entitlement to relief based thereon, and shall demonstrate that the Company complied with its mitigation obligations under subsection 8.3(B) (Mitigation).
Burden of Proof and Mitigation. The Design-Builder shall bear the burden of proof in establishing the occurrence of an Uncontrollable Circumstance and the entitlement to relief based thereon, and shall demonstrate that the Design-Builder complied with its mitigation obligations under Section 42.10..

Related to Burden of Proof and Mitigation

  • Burden of Proof In all cases of discipline, the burden of proof of just cause shall rest with the Employer.

  • No Presumptions; Burden of Proof For purposes of this Agreement, the termination of any Claim by judgment, order, settlement (whether with or without court approval) or conviction, or upon a plea of nolo contendere, or its equivalent, shall not create a presumption that Indemnitee did not meet any particular standard of conduct or have any particular belief or that a court has determined that indemnification is not permitted by applicable law. In addition, neither the failure of the Reviewing Party to have made a determination as to whether Indemnitee has met any particular standard of conduct or had any particular belief, nor an actual determination by the Reviewing Party that Indemnitee has not met such standard of conduct or did not have such belief, prior to the commencement of legal proceedings by Indemnitee to secure a judicial determination that Indemnitee should be indemnified under applicable law, shall be a defense to Indemnitee’s claim or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met any particular standard of conduct or did not have any particular belief. In connection with any determination by the Reviewing Party or otherwise as to whether Indemnitee is entitled to be indemnified hereunder, the burden of proof shall be on the Company to establish that Indemnitee is not so entitled.

  • Defense to Indemnification and Burden of Proof It shall be a defense to any action brought by Indemnitee against the Company to enforce this Agreement (other than an action brought to enforce a claim for Losses incurred in defending against a Claim related to an Indemnifiable Event in advance of its final disposition) that it is not permissible under applicable law for the Company to indemnify Indemnitee for the amount claimed. In connection with any such action or any related Standard of Conduct Determination, the burden of proving such a defense or that the Indemnitee did not satisfy the applicable standard of conduct shall be on the Company.

  • Presumptions and Burdens of Proof; Effect of Certain Proceedings (a) In making any determination with respect to entitlement to indemnification hereunder, the person or persons or entity making such determination shall, to the fullest extent not prohibited by law, presume that Indemnitee is entitled to indemnification under this Agreement if Indemnitee has submitted a request for indemnification in accordance with Section 5.01(b) of this Agreement, and the Company shall, to the fullest extent not prohibited by law, have the burden of proof to overcome that presumption in connection with the making by any person, persons or entity of any determination contrary to that presumption. Neither the failure of any person, persons or entity to have made a determination prior to the commencement of any action pursuant to this Agreement that indemnification is proper in the circumstances because Indemnitee has met the applicable standard of conduct, nor an actual determination by any person, persons or entity that Indemnitee has not met such applicable standard of conduct, shall be a defense to the action or create a presumption that Indemnitee has not met the applicable standard of conduct.

  • Litigation; Compliance with Law Except as disclosed, there is no (i) action, suit, claim, proceeding or investigation pending or, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, threatened against or affecting the Company, at law or in equity, or before or by any municipal or other governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign; (ii) arbitration proceeding relating to the Company pending under collective bargaining agreements or otherwise; or (iii) governmental inquiry pending or, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, threatened against or affecting the Company (including, without limitation, any inquiry as to the qualification of the Company to hold or receive any license or permit), and, to the best of the Company’s knowledge, there is no reasonable basis for any of the foregoing. The Company is not in default with respect to any governmental order, writ, judgment, injunction or decree known to or served upon the Company of any court or of any governmental department, commission, board, bureau, agency or instrumentality, domestic or foreign. There is no action or suit by the Company pending or threatened against others. The Company has complied in all respects with all laws, rules, regulations and orders applicable to its businesses, operations, properties, assets, products and services, and the Company has all necessary permits, licenses and other authorizations required to conduct its business as conducted and as proposed to be conducted, except to the extent failure to comply or obtain any such permits, licenses or authorizations will not have a material adverse effect. There is no existing law, rule, regulation or order, and the Company is not aware of any proposed law, rule, regulation or order, which would prohibit or materially restrict the Company from, or otherwise materially and adversely affect the Company in, conducting its business in any jurisdiction in which it is now conducting business or in which it proposes to conduct business.

  • Litigation and Compliance with Law Except as set forth in Schedule 5.17, there are no claims, actions, suits or proceedings, pending or, to the knowledge of the Companies and the Stockholders, threatened against or affecting any Company, at law or in equity, or before or by any Governmental Authority having jurisdiction over such Company. No written notice of any claim, action, suit or proceeding, whether pending or threatened, has been received by any Company and, to the Stockholders' and the Companies' knowledge, there is no basis therefor. Except to the extent set forth in Schedule 5.17, each Company has conducted and is conducting its business in compliance with all Laws applicable to such Company, its assets or the operation of its business.

  • Settlement of Litigation 8.7.1.2 Determination by the Licensing Administrator of back royalties owed by a licensee, including any determination made by the Licensing Administrator pursuant to Section 3.5.4;

  • Defense of Litigation To appear in and defend any action or proceeding that may affect its title to or Secured Party’s interest in the Collateral.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.