Analysis of the Batch Algorithm Sample Clauses

Analysis of the Batch Algorithm. When , the performance metrics will depend on the membership leave positions and exact metrics cannot be obtained. Therefore, whenever , we derive the ex- pected performance measures. Due to limited space, read- ers can refer to [5] for detailed mathematical derivation and results.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Analysis of the Batch Algorithm. Since the actual per- formance of the Batch algorithm depends on the membership leave positions whenever L > 0, we consider only the expected E[RQueue bat h℄ >
Sample 1
Analysis of the Batch Algorithm. Since the actual per- formance of the Batch algorithm depends on the membership leave positions whenever L > 0, we consider only the expected E[RQueue bat h℄ > (N N=2 ) >8 0; if J = 0, L = N h 1 l performance measures rather than the exact ones, although n the exact and expected results are the same when L = 0. Our analysis adopts the convention that the combination equals = ><> Pl=0 2 1 L > h 1 l L
Sample 1
Analysis of the Batch Algorithm. Since the actual per- formance of the Batch algorithm depends on the membership E[RQueue−batch] leave positions whenever L > 0, we consider only the expected performance measures rather than the exact ones, although r  0,  h 1 2l  Σ − Σ (N−N/2l) Σ L L − L, if J = 0, 0 ≤ L< N if J = 0, L = N . Σ the exact and expected results are the same when L = 0. Our analysis adopts the convention that the combination n equals 0 if n < 0, r < 0, or n < r. = l=0 1 − L l=0 2 1 − Σ  Σh−1 l Σ (N) (N−N/2l) L (N) − (L − 1), otherwise. (8) We first derive the expected number of renewed nodes. Consider a node v at level l. In a completely balanced tree, node v has N/2l descendants. At a rekeying instance, node v can be in one of the three distinct states: no-change, pruned, and renewed. Node v can be in the “no-change” state if none of its N/2l descendants wish to leave. Thus, the probability of node v being in the “no-change” state is . Σ .N −N/2lΣ N
Sample 1
Analysis of the Batch Algorithm. In analyzing the performance of the Batch algorithm, we consider the following five cases. Note that when , the performance metrics will depend on the membership leave positions and exact metrics cannot be obtained. Therefore, whenever , we derive the expected performance mea- sures. We also define and be the two perfor- xxxxx measures under condition . We also adopt the con- vention that the combination equals 0 if , or . Due to limited space, readers can refer to [5] for detailed mathematical derivation and results.
Sample 1

Related to Analysis of the Batch Algorithm

  • Test The outer surface of the lamp lenses shall be subjected once or more than once to the action of the sand jet produced as described above. The jet shall be sprayed almost perpendicular to the surface to be tested. The deterioration shall be checked by means of one or more samples of glass placed as a reference near the lenses to be tested. The mixture shall be sprayed until the variation in the diffusion of light on the sample or samples measured by the method described in Appendix 2, is such that: Δ d = (T5 - T4) / T2 ≤ 0.0250 ± 0.0025 Several reference samples may be used to check that the whole surface to be tested has deteriorated homogeneously. Annex 6 - Appendix 4

  • Purchase Order Pricing/Product Deviation If a deviation of pricing/product on a Purchase Order or contract modification occurs between the Vendor and the TIPS Member, TIPS must be notified within five (5) business days of receipt of change order. Termination for Convenience of TIPS Agreement Only TIPS reserves the right to terminate this agreement for cause or no cause for convenience with a thirty (30) days prior written notice. Termination for convenience is conditionally required under Federal Regulations 2 CFR part 200 if the customer is using federal funds for the procurement. All purchase orders presented to the Vendor, but not fulfilled by the Vendor, by a TIPS Member prior to the actual termination of this agreement shall be honored at the option of the TIPS Member. The awarded Vendor may terminate the agreement with ninety (90) days prior written notice to TIPS 0000 XX Xxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxx 00000. The vendor will be paid for goods and services delivered prior to the termination provided that the goods and services were delivered in accordance with the terms and conditions of the terminated agreement. This termination clause does not affect the sales agreements executed by the Vendor and the TIPS Member customer pursuant to this agreement. TIPS Members may negotiate a termination for convenience clause that meets the needs of the transaction based on applicable factors, such as funding sources or other needs. TIPS Member Purchasing Procedures Usually, purchase orders or their equal are issued by participating TIPS Member to the awarded vendor and should indicate on the order that the purchase is per the applicable TIPS Agreement Number. Orders are typically emailed to TIPS at xxxxxx@xxxx-xxx.xxx. • Awarded Vendor delivers goods/services directly to the participating member. • Awarded Vendor invoices the participating TIPS Member directly. • Awarded Vendor receives payment directly from the participating member. • Fees are due to TIPS upon payment by the Member to the Vendor. Vendor agrees to pay the participation fee to TIPS for all Agreement sales upon receipt of payment including partial payment, from the Member Entity or as otherwise agreed by TIPS in writing and signed by an authorized signatory of TIPS.

  • SAMPLE (i) Unless agreed otherwise, wheeled or track lay- ing equipment shall not be operated in areas identified as needing special measures except on roads, landings, tractor roads, or skid trails approved under B5.1 or B6.422. Purchaser may be required to backblade skid trails and other ground disturbed by Purchaser’s Opera- tions within such areas in lieu of cross ditching required under B6.6. Additional special protection measures needed to protect such known areas are identified in C6.24.

  • Random Testing Notwithstanding any provisions of the Collective Agreement or any special agreements appended thereto, section 4.6 of the Canadian Model will not be applied by agreement. If applied to a worker dispatched by the Union, it will be applied or deemed to be applied unilaterally by the Employer. The Union retains the right to grieve the legality of any imposition of random testing in accordance with the Grievance Procedure set out in this Collective Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.