Access Record Clause Samples
Access Record. Our track record in fair access and widening participation, as we’ve noted, is an exceptionally strong one exemplified in: - The diversity of our student profile; - Our historic and enduring commitment to the University’s mission (and) - Our achievement in out-performing both National Performance Indicators and HEFCE benchmarks We have been less successful however in facilitating student progression, achievement and completion. We fully recognise this issue and are committed to improving our performance in this regard.
Access Record. The Monitoring Unit will generate an accurate daily record (the “Access Record”) of the use of the System by Guests, including a record of the Pay-Per-Usage Service Fees attributable to each Room account. *** shall be responsible for all costs associated with the programming of the Monitoring Unit to enable it to provide the Access Record. Marriott or its designee shall be entitled to inspect and test the Monitoring Unit in any Hotel to verify its accuracy.
Access Record. 2.1.1 Evaluation of our access indicators shows that we have a strong record in widening access and participation. We have provided the opportunity of a university education to many full‐time and part‐ time students from disadvantaged backgrounds, under‐represented groups, or from schools and colleges where contextual data suggests that academic outcomes are below the national average (e.g. in several Coventry City schools). We are proud of our comprehensive range of support for access including outreach activities which improve access to Higher Education from under‐represented groups, these are measured by our performance in the following access focussed metrics:
Access Record. Marriott and OCC agree that the Access Record shall be the joint property of OCC and Marriott, subject to the following:
(a) The Access Record shall be deemed the confidential information of each party. OCC shall make available to Marriott information sufficient to ensure proper billing of Guests and other information or usage reports as Marriott may reasonably request to track System usage.
(b) OCC may review and use the Access Record as necessary to provide the Services and for such other internal analytical, statistical, performance, and business purposes as OCC may reasonably deem appropriate, except that OCC shall not use such Service Record for purposes of contacting Marriott customers and shall not sell, lease, or transfer such information to third parties, nor make any external use of this information in a form which will particularly identify Marriott or its customers.
Access Record. Assessment of our Access record reveals significant success in recruiting under-represented groups to the University of Reading. Sixty two percent of (home-domiciled 2016/17) entrants belonged to one or more groups that are under-represented in higher education nationally4; and of these, almost half actually belonged to two or more target groups. Almost one fifth of UoR 2016/17 entrants are from low participation neighbourhoods (Q1 & Q2) 4 5 Unknow 8% n 1% In 2015/16 we met or exceeded our recruitment targets for state school entrants, entrants from low participation neighbourhoods and from low-income backgrounds. We are also maintaining close alignment with our HESA Performance Indicator benchmarks as they increase over the years (table 1). We have consistently exceeded our HESA benchmark for students in receipt of DSA. In addition, representation of all disabled students remains high: 12.1% of 2015/16 young entrants declared a disability. (table 2) 4 Target groups used in this analysis were: Disabled; DSA; NS-SEC 4-7; ▇▇▇▇; income <25k; POLAR Q1 or Q2. The calculation did not include Foundation Degree students which we would expect to increase this figure further. Neither did it include state school entrants as we already know that more than four fifths of our entrants fall into this group. Table 1: Proportion of young, full-time, first degree entrants admitted from state schools, Low Participation Neighbourhoods (LPNs), low-income backgrounds and ▇▇▇▇ students Year State School* LPNs (POLAR3 Q1)* Household income <£25K Ethnicity – ▇▇▇▇** Actual (%) Access Agreement target (%) HESA location adjusted benchmark Actual (%) Access Agreement target (%) HESA location adjusted benchmark Actual (%) Access Agreement target (%) HESA location adjusted benchmark Actual (%) Access Agreement target (%) HESA location adjusted benchmark 2015/16 87.4 86.5 86.1 7.1 6.5 8.6 23.0 25.5 N/A 17.6 19.0 N/A 2014/15 85.7 83.8 86.7 6.9 5.5 8.6 26.1 20.0 N/A 19.4 15.0 N/A 2013/14 86.1 82.6 86.1 6.5 5.3 8.0 25.0 19.6 N/A 19.0 14.9 N/A 2012/13 84.9 82.6 85.2 6.8 5.3 7.8 23.0 19.6 N/A 16.4 14.7 N/A 2011/12 83.4 - 84.6 7.0 - 7.4 24.7 - N/A 14.5 - N/A 2010/11 81.8 - 84.1 6.3 - 7.2 22.1 - N/A 14.0 - N/A *Data taken from HESA Performance Indicators **Young and mature entrants Table 2: Proportion of all full time first degree undergraduates receiving DSA (HESA Performance Indicators table T7) Year Actual (%) Access Agreement target (%) HESA benchmark (%) 2015/16 6.4 6.4 6.0 2014/15 6.4 6.3...