Examples of Non-Monitoring RTO in a sentence
M2M Entitlements are the equivalent of financial rights for the Non-Monitoring RTO to use the Monitoring RTO’s transmission system within the confines of the M2M redispatch process.
The rules for determining which Market Flow (unadjusted or adjusted) to compare to the Non-Monitoring RTO M2M Entitlement when any of the PARs at the Michigan-Ontario border are in-service are set forth below.
If the data exchanged for the M2M redispatch process was relied on by the Non-Monitoring RTO’s dispatch to determine the shadow cost the Non-Monitoring RTO was dispatching to when providing relief at an M2M Flowgate, the data transmitted by the Monitoring RTO that was used to determine the Non-Monitoring RTO’s shadow cost shall not be modified except by mutual agreement prior to calculating M2M settlements.
Common PARs In the equations below, the Non-Monitoring RTO is credited for or responsible for PAR_Impact resulting from the common PAR effect on the Monitoring RTO’s M2M Flowgates.
For each of the M2M Entitlement Periods listed above the Non-Monitoring RTO will calculate its M2M Entitlement on each M2M Flowgate for each hour of each day of a week that will serve as the representative week for that M2M Entitlement Period.
When any of the PARs at the Michigan-Ontario border are in-service, the ability of the Non-Monitoring RTO to provide an appreciable amount of redispatch relief will be determined by comparing either (i) the Non-Monitoring RTO’s unadjusted Market Flow, or (ii) the Non-Monitoring RTO Market Flow adjusted to reflect the expected impact of the PARs at the Michigan-Ontario border (“LEC Adjusted Market Flow”), to the Non-Monitoring RTO M2M Entitlement for the constrained M2M Flowgate.
To identify Flowgates the Parties will perform an off-line study to determine if there is a significant GLDF for at least one generator within the Non-Monitoring RTO, or significant PSF for at least one NY-NJ PAR, on a potential Flowgate within the Monitoring RTO that is greater than or equal to the thresholds as described below.
To identify M2M Flowgates the Parties will perform an off-line study to determine if the significant GLDF for at least one generator within the Non-Monitoring RTO, or significant PSF for at least one Ramapo PAR, on a potential M2M Flowgate within the Monitoring RTO is greater than or equal to the thresholds as described below.
When the Non-Monitoring RTO Market Flow (also the Market Flow used for settlement) is greater than the Non-Monitoring RTO M2M Entitlement for the constrained M2M Flowgate, the Monitoring RTO will assume that an appreciable amount of redispatch relief is available from the Non-Monitoring RTO and will engage the M2M coordination process for the constrained M2M Flowgate.
The Non-Monitoring RTO shall use the Market Flow data for all of the like day/hours, that occurred in that day of the week and hour in the M2M Entitlement Period, in each year contained within the three year period agreed to by the Parties to calculate the Non-Monitoring RTO’s average Market Flow on each M2M Flowgate.