EWCA definition
Examples of EWCA in a sentence
The question of what constitutes "fairly disclosed" has been considered in a number of cases, and most recently in the case of Infiniteland Limited and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Aviss v Artisan Contracting Ltd and Artisan (UK) PLC [2005] EWCA Civ 758.
Although the High Court phrased its concern over the fate of the detained British nationals delicately, it clearly accepted that the situation was the result of ‘the most 63 [2002] EWCA Civ 1598, [2002] All ER (D) 70 (Nov) (CA, Civ Div), see also 125 ILR 685-726.
This approach was endorsed by the Court of Appeal in 2006 in Aerotel Limited v Telco Holdings Limited; Macrossans’ Patent Application [2006] EWCA Civ 1371, where the Court set out the structured approach to assessing whether a claimed invention relates to patentable subject- matter shown on the right.
Department [2016] EWCA Civ 6 involves intent or recklessness on the part of the individual (para 55)) or action which is designed seriously to interfere / disrupt an electronic system.
Enesa Engenharia S.A. [2012] EWCA Civ 638, ▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇▇/_/▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇-▇-▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇-%▇▇▇▇▇▇%▇▇- ewca-civ-638/, 26.04.2020.
The Closing Date Balance Sheet and the Working Capital Closing Statement, respectively, shall be prepared on a basis consistent with the Current Balance Sheet and the EWCA Statement, respectively, using the same accounting methods, policies, practices, procedures and adjustments as were used in the preparation of the Current Balance Sheet and the EWCA Statement, respectively.
He referred to Croydon London Borough Council v ▇▇▇▇▇ [2001] EWCA Civ 134, where an adjournment was given as the appellant was awaiting a determination of an application for legal aid and she had been served with the respondents' witness statements and other documents shortly before the hearing.
This distinction between Category 1 cases and Category 2 cases also fits with the approach taken by the Court of Appeal in Gaia Ventures Ltd v Abbeygate Helical (Leisure Plaza) Ltd [2019] EWCA Civ 823 in which the court was concerned with an agreement for the sale and purchase of a lease of a leisure complex in ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Keynes for the purpose of a development.
At first instance in Rhodia International Holdings Ltd v Huntsman International LLC [2007] EWHC 292 (Comm), ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ QC (as a Deputy Judge of the Commercial Court) described an important tripartite distinction which has since been approved by the Court of Appeal (in Sidhu v ▇▇▇▇▇▇ [2010] EWCA Civ 531 at [16]).
Secretary of State for Defence, [2007] UKHL 58, on appeal from [2006] EWCA Civ 327 (rejecting the idea of ending legal enquiry by the invocation of Art.