Adverse Market Movement definition

Adverse Market Movement means a change in prevailing applicable exchange rates such as reversal of an FX Contract at the prevailing market rates would generate a loss
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
Adverse Market Movement means, where in Finofo's reasonable opinion, the market rate for the Sell Currency to the Buy Currency has moved adversely on a Mark to Market Valuation;
Sample 1
Adverse Market Movement means an adverse movement in the foreign exchange market between the Buy Currency and the Sell Currency at the determination of VFX .
Sample 1

Examples of Adverse Market Movement in a sentence

  • Argentex will return the Variation Margin to the Client upon request, providing the Adverse Market Movement has fully reversed across all FX Contracts between the Client and Argentex.

  • Argentex may at its discretion use the Initial Margin or Variation Margin on one FX Contract as Initial Margin or Variation Margin on another FX Contract where an Adverse Market Movement has caused the Initial Margin on such FX Contract to fall short of Initial Margin called for.


More Definitions of Adverse Market Movement

Adverse Market Movement means a change in prevailing applicable exchange rates such that a reversal of an FX Contract at the prevailing market rates would lead to a loss.
Sample 1

Related to Adverse Market Movement

  • Adverse Event means any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not related to the medicinal product.

  • Adverse action means a home or remote state action.

  • Current significant investigative information means investigative information that a licensing board, after an inquiry or investigation that includes notification and an opportunity for the audiologist or speech-language pathologist to respond, if required by state law, has reason to believe is not groundless and, if proved true, would indicate more than a minor infraction.