Examples of 2006 Purchase Agreement in a sentence
By exercising the rights represented by this Warrant, the undersigned hereby certifies that, as of the date of exercise of this Warrant, the representations and warranties contained in Sections 5.2, 5.3 and 5.4 of the 2006 Purchase Agreement are true and correct in all material respects with respect to the undersigned.
Goknet ArbitrationOn November 6, 2012, PMI received a request from Goknet Mining Company Limited (“Goknet”) seeking PMI’s consent to the assignment of certain royalties under a 2006 Purchase Agreement between the Company and Goknet.
All questions concerning the construction, validity, enforcement and interpretation of this Agreement shall be determined pursuant to the Governing Law provision of the September 2006 Purchase Agreement.
The initial holder of this Warrant may be entitled to the benefit of certain registration rights in respect of the Warrant Shares as provided in the 2006 Purchase Agreement, and any subsequent holder hereof may be entitled to such rights.
Any and all notices or other communications or deliveries required or permitted to be provided hereunder shall be made in accordance with the provisions of the September 2006 Purchase Agreement.
Whatever might be said about Manners’s role in the demise of Royce Homes, Tow has not identified record evidence or cited a case supporting an inference that Manners had or breached fiduciary duties by entering into the 1998 Agreement or 2006 Purchase Agreement with Speer, Royce Homes’s only other owner and partner.
The initial Warrantholder and any subsequent Warrantholder hereof shall be third party beneficiaries of all registration rights contained in the 2006 Purchase Agreement (subject to the terms, conditions and limitations contained therein) with respect to the Warrant Shares (on a pari passu basis with the registration rights granted to the holders of warrants issued pursuant to the 2006 Purchase Agreement).
Capitalized terms not defined in this Agreement shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the September 2006 Purchase Agreement.
On approval of the loan project, ADB has the strongest sense of project ownership rather than the EAs that will implement the project, operate the facilities, maintain the investments, and ensure the sustainability of benefits.
There appears to be no dispute among the Claimants, the Respondent, and Dr. Deep on these amounts, except for the fact that the Respondent did not include in its calculations the legal fees of approximately USD 557,000 incurred by the Claimants in making the March 2006 Purchase Agreement.