Technical Knowledge. SKILLS 4 3 2 1 N/O (Demonstrates general level of knowledge of fundamental skills for job; completes tasks on time; performs high quality work; can answer questions and provide feedback on technical problems) Comments: What do you appreciate most about this individual’s work performance? In what area(s) should this individual concentrate to improve effectiveness? Evaluation of the performance of this employee’s area of responsibility: The full-time faculty member shall provide to the evaluator a written summary that reviews the full-time faculty member’s activities and accomplishments in teaching, including how he/she has utilized the student feedback received each semester, curriculum development, research/creative achievement, relevant service, activities associated to the College’s strategic initiative or other areas of responsibility since the last formal evaluation. This written summary shall be attached to the evaluation. I do do not recommend this full-time faculty for continued employment with Lake Land College. ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The full-time faculty signature below shall serve as verification that this evaluation has been reviewed and discussed with the supervisor; it shall be understood that such signature merely signifies that the full-time faculty member has read the material in question. Such signature indicates neither agreement nor disagreement with its contents. The full-time faculty member shall have the right to respond in writing to any area of the performance evaluation and/or interview notations. Any written response will be attached to this review and placed in the full-time faculty member’s personnel file. (Signature of Full-Time Faculty Member) (Signature of Evaluator) Date: Date: Non-Tenured Full-Time Faculty Performance Evaluation Conducted by Division Faculty NOTE: Non-tenured division full-time faculty members other than the candidate being evaluated may vote in the first and second year. Only tenured full-time faculty of a division shall vote on whether to grant or deny tenure at the end of the probationary period. Year of faculty evaluation: (check one box) 1st yr. 2nd yr. 3rd yr. 1= very poor, great deal of improvement needed 2= below average, needs some improvement 3= satisfactory 4= above average 5 = excels, is a strong candidate in this area N/O = No opportunity to observe
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement
Technical Knowledge. SKILLS 4 3 2 1 N/O (Demonstrates general level of knowledge of fundamental skills for job; completes tasks on time; performs high quality work; can answer questions and provide feedback on technical problems) Comments: What do you appreciate most about this individual’s work performance? In what area(s) should this individual concentrate to improve effectiveness? Evaluation of the performance of this employee’s area of responsibility: The full-time faculty member shall provide to the evaluator a written summary that reviews the full-time faculty member’s activities and accomplishments in teaching, including how he/she has utilized the student feedback received each semester, curriculum development, research/creative achievement, relevant service, activities associated to the College’s strategic initiative or other areas of responsibility since the last formal evaluation. This written summary shall be attached to the evaluation. I do do not recommend this full-time faculty for continued employment with Lake Land College. ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The full-time faculty signature below shall serve as verification that this evaluation has been reviewed and discussed with the supervisor; it shall be understood that such signature merely signifies that the full-time faculty member has read the material in question. Such signature indicates neither agreement nor disagreement with its contents. The full-time faculty member shall have the right to respond in writing to any area of the performance evaluation and/or interview notations. Any written response will be attached to this review and placed in the full-time faculty member’s personnel file. (Signature of Full-Time Faculty Member) (Signature of Evaluator) Date: Date: Non-Tenured Full-Time Faculty Performance Evaluation Conducted by Division Faculty NOTE: Non-tenured division full-time faculty members other than the candidate being evaluated may vote in the first and second year. Only tenured full-time faculty of a division shall vote on whether to grant or deny tenure at the end of the probationary period. Year of faculty evaluation: (check one box) 1st yr. 2nd yr. 3rd yr. 1= very poor, great deal of improvement needed 2= below average, needs some improvement 3= satisfactory 4= above average 5 = excels, is a strong candidate in this area N/O = No opportunity to observeFaculty
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Collective Bargaining Agreement