Project Performance Metrics. The goal of this subtask is to finalize key performance targets for the project based on feedback from the TAC and report on final results in achieving those targets. The performance targets should be a combination of scientific, engineering, techno-economic, and/or programmatic metrics that provide the most significant indicator of the research or technology’s potential success. • Complete and submit the project performance metrics section of the Initial Project Benefits Questionnaire, developed in the Evaluation of Project Benefits task, to the CAM. • Present the draft project performance metrics at the first TAC meeting to solicit input and comments from the TAC members. • Develop and submit a TAC Performance Metrics Summary that summarizes comments received from the TAC members on the proposed project performance metrics. The TAC Performance Metrics Summary will identify: o TAC comments the Recipient proposes to incorporate into the Initial Project Benefits Questionnaire, developed in the Evaluation of Project Benefits task. o TAC comments the Recipient does not propose to incorporate with and explanation why. • Develop and submit a Project Performance Metrics Results document describing the extent to which the Recipient met each of the performance metrics in the Final Project Benefits Questionnaire, developed in the Evaluation of Project Benefits task. • Discuss the Project Performance Metrics Results at the Final Meeting. • TAC Performance Metrics Summary • Project Performance Metrics Results The goal of this task is to create the stationary storage systems level requirements document which will define the parameters for the subsequent tasks. • Develop a Systems Requirements Survey and conduct interviews of potential customers. o This survey will be used to gather input from potential users of the system to inform performance and cost targets for the battery system.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Grant Agreement
Project Performance Metrics. The goal of this subtask is to finalize key performance targets for the project based on feedback from the TAC and report on final results in achieving those targets. The performance targets should be a combination of scientific, engineering, techno-economic, and/or programmatic metrics that provide the most significant indicator of the research or technology’s potential success. • ● Complete and submit the project performance metrics section of from the Initial Project Benefits Questionnaire, developed in the Evaluation of Project Benefits task, to the CAM. • ● Present the draft project performance metrics at the first TAC meeting to solicit input and comments from the TAC members. • ● Develop and submit a TAC Performance Metrics Summary that summarizes comments received from the TAC members on the proposed project performance metrics. The TAC Performance Metrics Summary will identify: o TAC comments the Recipient proposes to incorporate into the Initial Project Benefits Questionnaire, developed in the Evaluation of Project Benefits task. o TAC comments the Recipient does not propose to incorporate with and explanation why. • ● Develop and submit a Project Performance Metrics Results document describing the extent to which the Recipient met each of the performance metrics in the Final Project Benefits Questionnaire, developed in the Evaluation of Project Benefits task. • ● Discuss the Project Performance Metrics Results at the Final Meeting. • ● TAC Performance Metrics Summary • ● Project Performance Metrics Results The goal of this task is to create incorporate cooking electrification, kitchen ventilation, filtration and education interventions into an existing home-based asthma management program. ● Develop a protocol to assess the stationary storage systems level requirements adequacy of kitchen exhaust ventilation that can be implemented by community health workers (CHW) as part of a home asthma program visit. ● Develop a checklist and data form for CHWs to screen homes with gas cooking ranges for their potential to have an electric induction range installed as a replacement, or to accommodate 120V electric cooking appliances. ● Develop a checklist and data form to document which will define the parameters potential to replace or install kitchen exhaust ventilation in homes where it is not currently present. ● Train the CHWs of the Central California Asthma Collaborative (CCAC) on the protocols for assessment of kitchen ventilation and cooking electrification potential. ● Develop expertise among the collaborating community-based organizations on the use of induction cooktops and 120V electric appliances. ● Develop procedures for community-based organizations to educate program participants on the use of induction cooktops and to select a package of 120V electric appliances to maximize the displacement of gas range use when range replacement is infeasible. ● Develop an educational module to provide Arm 2 participants with information about the impacts of shifting gas range use to 120V countertop electric appliances (as collected during Phase 1). ● Develop an educational module for the subsequent tasksuse of real-time IAQ monitoring and portable air cleaners to reduce fine particle concentrations from cooking. • ● Incorporate all procedures and data forms described above, along with the educational materials developed to motivate and guide kitchen exhaust ventilation use, into CCAC’s home asthma management program. ● Develop a Systems Requirements Survey additional questions for the intake, feedback and conduct interviews of potential customers. o This survey will be used to gather input from potential users final program assessment forms of the system CCAC asthma program to inform performance include feedback about the cooking electrification and cost targets mitigation assessments. ● Produce a set of Enhanced Asthma Program Data Collection Forms that incorporate the elements noted above. ● Identify, vet and set up contracts with contractors to conduct the electrical upgrades and replace or install kitchen ventilation within each study location. ● Develop arrangements for scheduling and consultations between CCAC and Association for Energy Affordability (AEA). ● Conduct at least 2 field training visits for each CCAC team to practice implementing protocols for kitchen ventilation and electrical upgrade potential. ● Review feedback from program participants and obtain feedback from CHWs at the battery system.end of the first year of data collection; revise protocols as appropriate. ● Review feedback from program participants and obtain feedback from CHWs at the end of the second year of data collection and analyze to identify potential improvements ● Develop the Asthma Program Enhancements to Address Gas-Burner and Cooking- Related Pollutants Presentation describing the enhancements to CCAC’s Asthma Impact Model to reduce exposures to air pollutants from gas burners and cooking that were developed for this study and lessons learned from implementing the measures with program participants. ● Enhanced Asthma Program Data Collection Forms ● Asthma Program Enhancements to Address Gas-Burner and Cooking-Related Pollutants Presentation
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Grant Agreement
Project Performance Metrics. The goal of this subtask is to finalize key performance targets for the project based on feedback from the TAC and report on final results in achieving those targets. The performance targets should be a combination of scientific, engineering, techno-economic, and/or programmatic metrics that provide the most significant indicator of the research or technology’s potential success. • ● Complete and submit the project performance metrics section of from the Initial Project Benefits Questionnaire, developed in the Evaluation of Project Benefits task, to the CAM. • ● Present the draft project performance metrics at the first TAC meeting to solicit input and comments from the TAC members. • ● Develop and submit a TAC Performance Metrics Summary that summarizes comments received from the TAC members on the proposed project performance metrics. The TAC Performance Metrics Summary will identify: o TAC comments the Recipient proposes to incorporate into the Initial Project Benefits Questionnaire, developed in the Evaluation of Project Benefits task. o TAC comments the Recipient does not propose to incorporate with and explanation why. • ● Develop and submit a Project Performance Metrics Results document describing the extent to which the Recipient met each of the performance metrics in the Final Project Benefits Questionnaire, developed in the Evaluation of Project Benefits task. • ● Discuss the Project Performance Metrics Results at the Final Meeting. • ● TAC Performance Metrics Summary • ● Project Performance Metrics Results The goal of this task is to create Products that require a draft version are indicated by marking “(draft and final)” after the stationary storage systems level requirements document which will define product name in the parameters for the subsequent tasks. • Develop a Systems Requirements Survey and conduct interviews of potential customers. o This survey will be used to gather input from potential users “Products” section of the system task/subtask. If “(draft and final)” does not appear after the product name, only a final version of the product is required. Subtask 1.1 (Products) describes the procedure for submitting products to inform performance and cost targets for the battery systemCAM.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Grant Agreement
Project Performance Metrics. The goal of this subtask is to finalize identify key performance targets for the project based on feedback from the TAC and report on final results in achieving those targetsproject. The performance targets should be a combination of scientific, engineering, techno-economic, and/or programmatic metrics that provide the most significant indicator of the research or technology’s potential success. • Complete and submit the project performance metrics section of from the Initial Project Benefits Questionnaire, developed in the Evaluation of Project Benefits task, to the CAM. • Present the draft project performance metrics at the first TAC meeting to solicit input and comments from the TAC members. • Develop and submit a TAC Performance Metrics Summary that summarizes comments received from the TAC members on the proposed project performance metrics. The TAC Performance Metrics Summary will identify: o • TAC comments the Recipient proposes to incorporate into the Initial Project Benefits Questionnaire, developed in the Evaluation of Project Benefits task. o • TAC comments the Recipient does not propose to incorporate with and explanation why. • Develop and submit a Project Performance Metrics Results document describing the extent to which the Recipient met each of the performance metrics in the Final Project Benefits Questionnaire, developed in the Evaluation of Project Benefits task. • Discuss the Project Performance Metrics Results at the Final Meeting. • TAC Performance Metrics Summary • Project Performance Metrics Results The goal of this task is to create perform a viability study on alternative cell designs (larger cell format, opposing tab cell arrangements, pouch sealing methods) and components (current collectors, separator, active materials, etc.) to develop an ultra-safe cell optimized for module integration, based on the stationary storage systems level requirements document which will define the parameters for the subsequent tasksRecipient’s existing commercial product. • Develop Confer with stakeholders (customers, suppliers, etc.) to identify key cell design and supply chain challenges for module integration. • Determine R&D strategies to reach high target cell-level performance metrics, including but not limited to: o alternative active materials o alternative separator o alternative current collectors • Prepare a Systems Requirements Survey Viability Test Plan that describes the technical objectives, test procedures, conditions, facilities, and equipment required to assess the new components and cell designs. This document will be 3-10 pages, will include graphics and figures, and will have an executive summary that is written for a non-technical audience. • Conduct all experiments and down-select the alternative components and cell formats that meet the cell-level electrochemical performance outlined in the Project Performance Metrics Results. • Design and implement a procurement/inventory system that alleviates concerns and challenges around the raw materials supply chain. • Prepare a Viability Study Report that defines the design and components of the ultra-safe cell optimized for module integration. This report will be 3-10 pages, will include graphics and figures, and will have an executive summary that is written for a non-technical audience. • Assemble an adequate number of ultra-safe cells to conduct interviews the characterization experiments outlined in Task 3. • Viability Test Plan • Viability Study Report The goal of potential customersthis task is to perform a full characterization of the ultra-safe cell performance under relevant operating conditions for electric aviation applications (realistic flight profiles, safety testing, self-heating) and obtain all relevant safety certifications. • Prepare a Cell Characterization Plan, including the conditions, facilities, and equipment required to conduct the following tests: o Simulation of realistic flight profiles to test the cells’ electrochemical and physical properties o Safety screening experiments (overheating, nail penetration, overcharge, etc.) o This survey plan will be used 3-10 pages, will include graphics and figures, and will have an executive summary that is written for a non-technical audience. • Conduct the tests outlined in the Cell Characterization Plan • Prepare a Cell Characterization Report that describes the test results. This report will be 3-10 pages, will include graphics and figures, and will have an executive summary that is written for a non-technical audience. • Determine the safety certifications needed, using battery safety testing methods and objectives established by DO-311A and recent Federal Aviation Administration Issue Papers as a guideline • Send the cells to gather input from potential users a third-party, certified test center to perform safety certification tests for UN, DOT, and UL standards, as needed • Prepare a Safety Report that describes the results of the system to inform performance safety certification tests. This report will be 3-10 pages, will include graphics and cost targets figures, and will have an executive summary that is written for the battery system.a non-technical audience. • Cell Characterization Plan • Cell Characterization Report • Safety Report
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Grant Agreement