PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEWS Clause Samples

The "Program Compliance Reviews" clause establishes the right of one party, typically the program administrator or regulator, to review and assess the other party’s adherence to the requirements and standards set forth in the agreement. This may involve scheduled or random audits, requests for documentation, or on-site inspections to verify that all operational, financial, or reporting obligations are being met. The core function of this clause is to ensure ongoing compliance, identify potential issues early, and maintain the integrity of the program by providing a mechanism for oversight and accountability.
PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEWS. A. The LESO conducts a Program Compliance Review (PCR) for each State that is enrolled in the LESO Program every two (2) years. The LESO reserves the right to require an annual PCR, or similar inspection on a more frequent basis for any State. The LESO PCRs are performed in order to ensure that State Coordinators, SPOCs and all LEAs within a State are compliant with the terms and conditions of the LESO Program as required by 10 USC § 2576a, DLA Instructions and Manuals, and the DLA MOA signed by the State. If a State and/or ▇▇▇ fails a PCR, the LESO will immediately suspend their operations and will subsequently issue corrective actions (with suspense dates) to the State Coordinator, which will identify what is needed to rectify the identified deficiencies within the State and/or LEA. If a State and/or ▇▇▇ fails to correct identified deficiencies by the given suspense dates, the LESO will move to terminate the LESO Program operations within the State and/or LEA. B. The State shall: Support the LESO PCR process by: Contacting LEAs selected for the PCR review via phone and/or email to ensure they are aware of the PCR schedule and prepared for review. Receiving inventory selection from the LESO. The ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ shall gather the selected items in a centralized location to ensure that the LESO can efficiently inventory the items. Providing additional assistance to the LESO as required, prior to and during the course of the PCR. Conduct internal Program Compliance Reviews of LEAs participating in the LESO Program in order to ensure accountability, program compliance and validate annual inventory submissions are accurate. The State Coordinator must ensure an internal PCR of at least 5% of LEAs that have a property book from the LESO Program within his / her State is completed annually. This may result in a random review of all or selected property at the LEA. The internal PCR will include, at minimum: (1) A review of each selected LEAs LESO Program files. (2) A review of the signed State Plan of Operation (SPO). (3) A review of the LEA application and screener’s letter. (4) A physical inventory of the LESO Program property at each selected LEA. (5) A specific review of each selected LEAs files for the following: DD Form 1348-1A for each item currently on inventory, small arms documentation, transfer documents, turn-in documents, inventory adjustment documents, exception to policy letters (if any), approved cannibalization requests (if any), and other pertinent docum...
View SourceView Similar (14)
PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEWS. DCF may, at its discretion, schedule a more extensive Program Compliance Review. In the event that DCF conducts a compliance review, it may include the examination of records maintained by the W-2
View SourceView Similar (2)
PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEWS. An evaluation procedure used to determine if State agencies, local agencies, and other sub recipients are administering and operating FNS programs in accordance with program and civil rights regulations, instructions, policies, and guidance.
View Source
PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEWS. Compliance with EEO/AA statutes and regulations is designed to achieve parity among women and minorities in registered apprenticeship and training programs. To this end, BAT or SAC staff will conduct reviews of their assigned accounts to determine program sponsor’s compliance with EEO/AA requirements. The BAT or the SAC must review programs with five (5) or more apprentices periodically. The BAT or SAC staff will review the program sponsor’s progress toward stated EEO/AA goals and will provide technical assistance as necessary.
View Source

Related to PROGRAM COMPLIANCE REVIEWS

  • Compliance Review During the Term, Developer agrees to permit the GLO, HUD, and/or a designated representative of the GLO or HUD to access the Property for the purpose of performing Compliance-Monitoring Procedures. In accordance with GLO Compliance-Monitoring Procedures, the GLO or HUD will periodically monitor and audit Developer’s compliance with the requirements of this Agreement, the CDBG-DR Regulations, the CDBG Multifamily Rental Housing Guidelines, and any and all other Governmental Requirements during the Term. In conducting any compliance reviews, the GLO or HUD will rely primarily on information obtained from Developer’s records and reports, on-site monitoring, and audit reports. The GLO or HUD may also consider other relevant information gained from other sources, including litigation and citizen complaints. 5.04 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS: INDEMNIFICATION

  • Program Compliance The School Board shall be responsible for monitoring the program to provide technical assistance and to ensure program compliance.

  • Performance Reviews Supplier will perform a minimum of one review with Sourcewell per agreement year. The review will cover transactions to Participating Entities, pricing and terms, administrative fees, sales data reports, performance issues, supply chain issues, customer issues, and any other necessary information.

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Commercialization Reports Throughout the term of this Agreement and during the Sell-Off Period, and within thirty (30) days of December 31st of each year, Company will deliver to University written reports of Company’s and Sublicensees’ efforts and plans to develop and commercialize the innovations covered by the Licensed Rights and to make and sell Licensed Products. Company will have no obligation to prepare commercialization reports in years where (a) Company delivers to University a written Sales Report with active sales, and (b) Company has fulfilled all Performance Milestones. In relation to each of the Performance Milestones each commercialization report will include sufficient information to demonstrate achievement of those Performance Milestones and will set out timeframes and plans for achieving those Performance Milestones which have not yet been met.