Professional Development Decisions Sample Clauses
The 'Professional Development Decisions' clause outlines how choices regarding employee training, education, and skill enhancement are made within an organization. Typically, this clause specifies who has the authority to approve or mandate professional development activities, such as attending workshops, pursuing certifications, or participating in continuing education programs. By clearly defining the decision-making process and responsibilities, the clause ensures that professional growth opportunities align with organizational goals and that employees understand the procedures for requesting or being assigned development activities.
Professional Development Decisions. 21.8.1 Applications for Professional Development, including Sabbaticals, are reviewed by a “Professional Development Committee”, consisting of the following:
21.8.1.1 Vice-President, Academic, or designate (Chair, non-voting);
21.8.1.2 All Deans of Faculty; and
Professional Development Decisions. 32.6.1 Applications for Professional Development are reviewed by a “Professional Development Committee”, consisting of the following:
32.6.1.1 Vice-President, Academic, or designate (Chair, non-voting); and
32.6.1.2 1 academic staff Supervisor, and 2 academic staff members who are not under consideration that year for Professional Development;
32.6.2 In making decisions to grant, defer, or deny Professional Development, the Supervisor and Vice-President, Academic base their decisions on:
32.6.2.1 the content and quality of each proposal;
32.6.2.2 the merits of each proposal and its relevance to the academic staff member’s duties at the University;
32.6.2.3 the relevance of each proposal to the University’s educational objectives;
32.6.2.4 recommendations regarding Professional Development arising from academic staff member’s Performance Reviews;
32.6.2.5 previous Professional Development opportunities;
32.6.2.6 academic staff members’ years of service; and
32.6.2.7 the cost of the proposal within the context of available funds
32.6.3 The Vice-President, Academic will make every effort to notify the academic staff member, in writing, of the decision in a timely manner.
Professional Development Decisions. 21.8.2 In making decisions to grant, defer, or deny Professional Development, including Sabbaticals, the Professional Development Committee bases its decisions on:
21.8.2.1 The content and quality of each proposal;
21.8.2.2 The merits of each proposal and its relevance to the faculty member’s Teaching duties and Professional Practice/Research;
21.8.2.3 The relevance of each proposal to the University’s educational objectives; 21.
Professional Development Decisions. 32.6.1 Applications for Professional Development are reviewed by a “Professional Development Committee”, consisting of the following:
32.6.1.1 Vice-President, Academic, or designate (Chair, non-voting); and
32.6.1.2 All academic staff Supervisors and an equivalent number of academic staff members who are not under consideration that year for Professional Development;
32.6.2 In making decisions to grant, defer, or deny Professional Development the Professional Development Committee bases its decisions on:
32.6.2.1 the content and quality of each proposal;
32.6.2.2 the merits of each proposal and its relevance to the academic staff member's duties at the College;
32.6.2.3 the relevance of each proposal to the College's educational objectives;
32.6.2.4 recommendations regarding Professional Development arising from academic staff member's Performance Reviews;
32.6.2.5 previous Professional Development opportunities;
32.6.2.6 academic staff members' years of service; and
32.6.2.7 the cost of the proposal within the context of available funds
32.6.3 The Chair of the Professional Development Committee will make every effort to notify the academic staff member, in writing, of the Committee's decision, within 14 calendar days following the relevant Committee meeting.