Predictions Sample Clauses
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Predictions. A phonetic/ morphological reason for lack of predicative adjectives agreement: the erosion of endings found throughout the Germanic and Romance languages. A syntactic reason reason for lack of predicative adjectives agreement: That head-final AdjPs do not have spec-X° agreement, cf. the preceding sections. This particular syntactic reason does not apply to attributive adjectives. Presupposing that there are no other reasons why adjectives should lack agreement, the following predictions are made:
(26) 1. Languages with head-final AdjPs do not have agreement on predicative adjectives.
Predictions. The Subscriber understands that any forecasts or predictions as to the Company’s performance are based on estimates, assumptions and forecasts that the Company believes to be reasonable but that may prove to be materially incorrect, and no assurance is given that actual results will correspond with the results contemplated by the various forecasts.
Predictions. Proposal (final):
Predictions. 5.1: Astrologer understand that this is an astrology platform and only astrology services are provided through this platform. Astrologer is responsible for all predictions/advice made by the Astrologer. Astrologer understand and agrees that he will not make any prediction which is unlawful/illegal or against any law. Astrologer must refrain from advising below mentioned list of prediction/advice, which is not exhaustive. Predicting gender/sex of the unborn. Predicting on any matter/game related to gambling. Predicting on any matter which is illegal/unlawful. Predicting on any matter which is beyond Astrologer’️s expertise. Predicting on any matter for which astrologer is not qualified.
Predictions. The RQs will be examined by testing the following predictions: Theories like the Bottleneck Hypothesis (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2008) and Syntax-before-morphology (White, 2003) hypothesize that functional morphology is hard to acquire for language learners. The literature on functional morphology showcases this difficulty (▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, 2016). Also, data from studies like ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2016), ▇▇▇▇▇▇ et al. (2019) and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (2018) support this view. Accordingly, prediction 1 reflects this perspective because the two groups used in this study are comparable to those that were used in the studies mentioned above.
Prediction 1: Subject-verb agreement will be problematic for both groups in the pre-test.
Prediction 2: The sub-conditions local plural agreement and long-distance singular agreement will be more challenging for the participants than local singular agreement. Long-distance plural agreement will be the most difficult.
Prediction 3: Participants with low proficiency test scores will improve more in the post-test and delayed post-test than those with high proficiency test scores. Prediction 4: The post-test will show improvement in test scores for both groups. Prediction 5: Improvements in the PPP group will subside in the delayed post-test, while the improvements will remain in the TBLT group. Alternatively, the improvements in the TBLT group subside less than the improvements in the PPP group.
Predictions. Before summarizing our findings, we would like to lay out the predictions of the two most important accounts of agreement attraction.