Participle agreement Sample Clauses

Participle agreement. The analysis also makes a further prediction, under the assumption that head-finality in the AdjP and head-finality in the VP cooccur. In the languages where VPs and AdjPs are head- final, we would not only expect there to be no agreement with Adj° when an argument is extracted under A-movement from AdjP (i.e. in predicative adjective constructions), we would also expect there to be no agreement with V° when an argument is extracted under A-movement from VP. The relevant question is whether a non-finite verb in V° shows agreement with an argument extracted to the subject position, e.g. in passive and unaccusative (ergative) constructions. The following examples show how this looks in a VO-language, French, where agreement is possible:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Participle agreement. Italian Xxxxx xx è dat-a/*o un premio. Xxxxx.NOM REFL.DAT be.3SG xxxx.XXXX-X.XX/*X.XX a ‘Xxxx gave herself the prize.’ prize.ACC • In French past participles do not agree if it is the indirect object that is reflexivized (7a), while in Italian, agreement surfaces in those cases (7b). • This difference between French and Italian past participle agreement in dative reflexive constructions is unexpected.
Participle agreement. Italian Xxxxx xx è dat-a/*o un premio. Xxxxx.NOM SE.DAT be.3SG xxxx.XXXX-X.XX/*X.XX a ‘Xxxx gave herself the prize.’
Participle agreement. Italian Xxxxx xx e` dat-a/*o un premio. Xxxxx.NOM SE.DAT be.3SG xxxx.XXXX-X.XX/*X.XX a ‘Xxxx gave herself the prize.’ prize.ACC Dative si agrees first, as it is the closest (Agree relation 1). If datives are underspecified for number and gender, as proposed by Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (2003, 2005), they leave these features unvalued on the participle. A second Agree relation is established with the subject. Since Italian allows Multiple Agree, i.e. the dative is not an intervener when there is no feature conflict, the participle can further Agree with the subject in Spec,TP for remaining gender and number features (Agree relation 2), deriving (26). There are no conflicting person specifications as the nominative subject and dative si have the same person (in virtue of being coreferent).

Related to Participle agreement

  • Participation Agreement The Participation Agreement (Federal Express Corporation Trust No. N671FE), dated as of May 1, 1997, among the Lessee, the Owner Trustee not in its individual capacity except as otherwise expressly provided therein, but solely as owner trustee, the Owner Participant, the Indenture Trustee not in its individual capacity except as otherwise expressly provided therein, but solely as indenture trustee, the Pass Through Trustee not in its individual capacity except as otherwise expressly provided therein, but solely as pass through trustee and the Subordination Agent not in its individual capacity except as otherwise expressly provided therein, but solely as subordination agent.

  • Participation Agreements Prior to the Effective Date of this Arrangement, the CTO must sign an MDPCP Participation Agreement with CMMI (the “CTO Participation Agreement”). Prior to the Effective Date of this Arrangement, the Practice must sign an MDPCP Participation Agreement with CMMI (the “Practice Participation Agreement”). If either Party does not sign a Participation Agreement with CMMI prior to the Effective Date of this Arrangement, then this Arrangement shall be deemed null ab initio.

  • Single Agreement All Transactions are entered into in reliance on the fact that this Master Agreement and all Confirmations form a single agreement between the parties (collectively referred to as this “Agreement”), and the parties would not otherwise enter into any Transactions.

  • One Agreement This Agreement and any related security or other agreements required by this Agreement, collectively:

  • Whole Agreement The General Provisions, Special Provisions, and Attachments, as provided herein, constitute the complete Agreement (“Agreement”) between the parties hereto, and supersede any and all oral and written agreements between the parties relating to matters herein. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Agreement cannot be modified without written consent of the parties.

  • Arrangement Agreement This Plan of Arrangement is made pursuant to, and is subject to the provisions of, the Arrangement Agreement, except in respect of the sequence of the steps comprising the Arrangement, which shall occur in the order set forth herein.

  • Sole Agreement This Agreement constitutes the sole and only agreement between the parties and supersedes any prior understandings or written or oral agreements respecting the Agreement’s subject matter.

  • Contribution Agreement The Agent shall have received an executed counterpart of the Contribution Agreement.

  • Distribution Agreement This Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and delivered by the Company and constitutes a valid and binding obligation of the Company. The transactions contemplated by this Agreement have been duly authorized by the Company.

  • Acquisition Agreements If the Equipment is subject to any Acquisition Agreement, Lessee, as part of this lease, transfers and assigns to Lessor all of its rights, but none of its obligations (except for Lessee's obligation to pay for the Equipment conditioned upon Lessee's acceptance in accordance with Paragraph 6), in and to the Acquisition Agreement, including but not limited to the right to take title to the Equipment. Lessee shall indemnify and hold Lessor harmless in accordance with Paragraph 19 from any liability resulting from any Acquisition Agreement as well as liabilities resulting from any Acquisition Agreement Lessor is required to enter into on behalf of Lessee or with Lessee for purposes of this lease.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.