Mitigation Measures Consistent with FSEIR Sample Clauses

Mitigation Measures Consistent with FSEIR. In conjunction with the FSEIR and the approval of the Redevelopment Plan, the Former Agency and the City adopted CEQA Findings, including mitigation measures, a statement of overriding considerations, and a mitigation monitoring and reporting program. The Successor Agency, in taking approval actions under this MOU will comply with CEQA by acting as the lead agency and considering the FSEIR and any additional environmental review documents, if any, prepared by the Successor Agency and adopting findings in accordance with CEQA. In taking approval actions under this MOU, the Regents will comply with CEQA by acting as a responsible agency or a lead agency, as the case may be, by considering the FSEIR and any additional environmental review documents, if any, prepared by the Successor Agency or the Regents and adopting findings in accordance with CEQA, including, without limitation, the adoption of mitigation measures for which it is responsible as a result of its approval of proposed development on the
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Mitigation Measures Consistent with FSEIR

  • Mitigation Measures Company shall take commercially reasonable measures (except measures causing it to incur out-of-pocket expenses which BNYM does not agree in advance to reimburse) to mitigate losses or potential losses to BNYM, including taking verification, validation and reconciliation measures that are commercially reasonable or standard practice in the Company’s business.

  • FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS There are no budget implications. The applicant will be responsible for all costs, expenses, liabilities and obligations imposed under or incurred in order to satisfy the terms of this proposed development agreement. The administration of the proposed development agreement can be carried out within the approved 2019- 2020 budget and with existing resources.

  • Commingling of Resold Services with Unbundled Network Elements and Combinations of Unbundled Network Elements 6.7.1 To the extent it is Technically Feasible and pursuant to the terms of Section 9.1, CLEC may Commingle Telecommunications Services purchased on a resale basis with an Unbundled Network Element or combination of Unbundled Network Elements.

  • Conflicts with RS Means Unit Price Book If the terms of the solicitation referenced RS Means Unit Price Book occur, the RS Means Book shall control if it determines the legality of the solicitation award as it relates to the requisite Means Unit Price Book.

  • Required Procurement Procedures for Obtaining Goods and Services The Grantee shall provide maximum open competition when procuring goods and services related to the grant-assisted project in accordance with Section 287.057, Florida Statutes.

  • Aggravating and Mitigating Factors The penalties in this matter were determined in consideration of all relevant circumstances, including statutory factors as described in CARB’s Enforcement Policy. CARB considered whether the violator came into compliance quickly and cooperated with the investigation; the extent of harm to public health, safety and welfare; nature and persistence of the violation, including the magnitude of the excess emissions; compliance history; preventative efforts taken; innovative nature and the magnitude of the effort required to comply, and the accuracy, reproducibility, and repeatability of the available test methods; efforts to attain, or provide for, compliance prior to violation; action taken to mitigate the violation; financial burden to the violator; and voluntary disclosure. The penalties are set at levels sufficient to deter violations, to remove any economic benefit or unfair advantage from noncompliance, to obtain swift compliance, and the potential costs, risks, and uncertainty associated with litigation. Penalties in future cases might be smaller or larger depending on the unique circumstances of the case.

  • Mitigating Factors The Contractor had a Trafficking in Persons compliance plan or an awareness program at the time of the violation, was in compliance with the plan, and has taken appropriate remedial actions for the violation, that may include reparation to victims for such violations.

  • Avoiding Foreclosure; Mitigating Losses If Borrower is in Default, Lender may work with Borrower to avoid foreclosure and/or mitigate Lender’s potential losses, but is not obligated to do so unless required by Applicable Law. Lender may take reasonable actions to evaluate Borrower for available alternatives to foreclosure, including, but not limited to, obtaining credit reports, title reports, title insurance, property valuations, subordination agreements, and third-party approvals. Xxxxxxxx authorizes and consents to these actions. Any costs associated with such loss mitigation activities may be paid by Xxxxxx and recovered from Borrower as described below in Section 9(c), unless prohibited by Applicable Law.

  • Rights Protection Mechanisms and Abuse Mitigation ­‐ Registry Operator commits to implementing and performing the following protections for the TLD:

  • Procurement of Goods and Services (a) If the HSP is subject to the procurement provisions of the BPSAA, the HSP will abide by all directives and guidelines issued by the Management Board of Cabinet that are applicable to the HSP pursuant to the BPSAA.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.