Mentoring Process. The parties to this Agreement also recognize the importance and value of affording beginning teachers maximum opportunities to acquire the knowledge and develop the skills necessary to have successful teaching experiences. Toward this end they agree to cooperate in establishing a mentoring process which will not only satisfy legally mandated induction requirements, but will promote the personal and professional wellbeing of beginning teachers, will increase the retention of promising beginning teachers, and will transmit the shared core values of the district to such teachers. The following guidelines have therefore been agreed to in an effort to accomplish these goals.
Mentoring Process. ● The first Home Energy score conducted by an home energy assessor candidate will be a mentored session. ● During the mentored session, the Mentor and home energy assessor will do a walk through together. ● Home energy assessor candidate is encouraged to communicate with the mentor through the walkthrough so that the mentor can offer guidance on best practices, share their experience and correct the new home energy assessor candidate should there be any misunderstandings of data collection, measurements, and assumptions. ● If home energy assessor attended an Earth Advantage guided US DOE Simulation training, then a group mentoring session will be available to fulfill this mentoring requirement. ● Once a home energy score and home energy report is generated, the home energy assessor will need to correct any errors or deficiencies related to the home energy reports. ● If significant quality assurance assistance is needed during the mentored home energy score, the home energy assessor candidate’s second assessment will be mentored. During the second mentored assessment, if significant quality assurance assistance is needed, Mentor to require home energy assessor candidate to complete additional training courses before further home energy reports can be provided. ● If the mentored scoring session format is one-on-one and provided by Earth Advantage, this counts towards the 5% quality assurance re-score. ● If the mentored scoring session format is one-on-one and is not Earth Advantage, this does not count towards the 5% quality assurance re-score. ● If the mentored scoring session format is a group format, this does not count towards the 5% Quality Assurance Re-Scores, but it will satisfy the Mentor requirements.
Mentoring Process. The flow chart below provides an overview of the steps that the SKILL2E cultural mentoring concept can be broken down to. A detailed description of each stage and sample implementation descriptions can be found in the SKILL2E Enterprise Handbook published on the SKILL2E website. Each step builds on each other and is therefore essential for the success of the ensuing one. Figure 8: Process Model showing what needs to be done when. The following diagram shows the same process from the timeline perspective. Mentee selection, training and pairing mentor and mentee involve careful consideration of the qualification and motivation of all involved and the provision of appropriate training. Figure 9: Timeline of SKILL2E Cultural Mentoring Model. It should now be evident that the qualification of the mentor and his or her awareness of all the complex implications involved in the process are eventually crucial for the outcome of the learning relationship and the extent to which both mentor and mentee benefit from the process. Assessing the qualifications of the mentor, identifying training needs and delivering appropriate mentor preparation are therefore seminal factors. The following section presents model training concepts.
Mentoring Process. 1. Our Tutors are mentored using the Effective and Teaching Learning Framework developed Essex Music Services, Southend-on-Sea Music Services, Thurrock Music Services, Trinity College London, and Canterbury Xxxxxx Church University.
Mentoring Process. Describe methods of supervision; please be specific. For example, “Xxxxxxx every ministry engagement with the supervisor,” and/or “Meet weekly to discuss previous week’s ministry,” and/or “Receive written feedback from lay people re. Small Group Leadership or preaching…”
