Management Targets Clause Samples

The Management Targets clause sets specific performance goals or benchmarks that management is expected to achieve within a defined period. These targets may relate to financial metrics, operational efficiency, or other key performance indicators relevant to the organization. By clearly outlining expectations, this clause provides a basis for evaluating management's effectiveness and can be tied to incentives or consequences, thereby ensuring accountability and driving organizational performance.
Management Targets. The factors that inhibit progress toward conservation goals for this population are fish passage survival at Cowlitz Falls and strays from adult HORs transported upstream for harvest purposes. Only HORs that are positively identified as Upper Cowlitz coho (i.e., hatchery fish with 100% NOR parents), will be transported to the Upper Cowlitz. No Lower Cowlitz coho will be transported above Cowlitz Falls. The current hatchery program is integrated with a pNOB of 100%. These fish are reared and released from the Cowlitz Salmon Hatchery to avoid the loss due to low fish passage survival at Cowlitz Falls Dam. The challenge for this population is to provide fishing opportunity in the upper Cowlitz without exceeding a pHOS of 30% effective HOR spawners. The pHOS target can be met by a combination of increased FPS, increased harvest rate on HORs, and/or by limiting the number of adult HORs that are transported to the upper Cowlitz. Another potential means to improve homing and harvest rates for HORs that are transported above Cowlitz Falls would be to acclimate and release smolts from satellite ponds in the Upper Cowlitz. These acclimation ponds would be located where harvest opportunities would be greater and/or the likelihood would be significantly reduced that unharvested HORs end up mingling with NOR spawners. Unless transported below the Barrier Dam, a consequence of releasing hatchery fish in the upper basin would be reduced smolt to adult survival due to the limited fish passage survival. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ released from the acclimation ponds would have to be uniquely identified in order to be distinguished from those released directly from the hatchery. The credit mechanism (Section 2.5.3) for Upper Cowlitz coho would reduce this hatchery program by two smolts for every natural-origin smolt captured at Cowlitz Falls and released in the lower river. The hatchery program, however, would not be reduced due to crediting below a minimum level defined by the maximum number of adult HORs that could be transported in a high survival year for NORs. For this population, this number A methodology for estimating NOR return of Upper Cowlitz coho adults in-season must be developed before the fish passage survival trigger is met. This methodology should include a strategy to identify and transport the appropriate number of HORs to selected locations in the upper river for harvest while assuring that a 30% pHOS is met, once the trigger is met. Appendix G contains tables identifying th...
View Source
Management Targets. The harvest benefits in terms of numbers of fish caught are largely unknown. The potential ecological interaction risks associated with the program are also unknown. Harvest rates in the past have ranged from 26 - 46% (average 34%) (Tipping and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 1993).
View Source
Management Targets. Figure 3-15 captures the current conditions of the population, showing where we are now and where we expect to be in the future. Section 3.10.2, Decision Rules, describes how we intend to get from the current condition to the long-term target. No quantitative conservation targets have been identified for this population. It is expected to provide harvest benefits and nutrient enhancement. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ coho are being used as a "trigger" requirement for triggering volitional upstream fish passage at ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ (read Article 3 of the Settlement Agreement). In addition, the license requires Tacoma to test to see if any of three adult indigenous species of coho, chinook or steelhead can self sort themselves; " A) adult fish in ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Lake are able to choose their tributary of origin and survive ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Lake transit at rates determined by NMFS and USFWS, in consultation with the FTC or agencies, to be sufficient to achieve effective upstream passage through volitional facilities; and B) as determined based on the above- described tables with respect to: (i) the number of pre-spawners arriving at the Barrier Dam, in at least 3 of 5 consecutive brood years measured, and based on the 5-year rolling average, exceeds an abundance level which indicates natural recruitment above ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Dam has achieved self-sustaining levels, as determined by the National Marine Fisheries Service in consultation with the FTC or agencies; (ii) the productivity level in 3 of 5 years and the 5- year rolling average, as measured at the Barrier Dam or other Cowlitz River fish counting facilities by the recruit/pre-spawner ratio, exceeds 1.0; and (iii) the disease management plan required by Article 8 has been implemented." The Draft FHMP completely ignores this requirement of Tacoma's Operating License and doesn't address the issues of how this FHMP will address or deal with it. If in fact this requirement is dropped, Tacoma must amend its license to reflect so. But as it stands at this time, the FHMP must address this issue with all three species until Tacoma's license has been amended and must be addressed in every one of its Decision Rules, Monitoring Priorities, and Management Targets. It ain't Bugger King, and you can't order it anyway that you want to!
View Source
Management Targets. Figure 3-10 describes three views of the future for the population and the fisheries it supports (Scenarios A, B, and C). It identifies the conditions under which harvest and conservation goals will be reached in the future. The figure also captures the current conditions, showing where we are now and where we expect to be in the future.
View Source
Management Targets. No changes to the assumptions or management targets are expected over the period covered by this FHMP. The goals are to maintain population viability and to maximize harvest within the Cowlitz River, subject to the limitations associated with the operational constraints and priorities of the Cowlitz Salmon Hatchery. The genetic identity and diversity of the population will continued to be maintained by employing BMPs in the hatchery (collecting eggs over the entire return timing, 1:1 mating schemes, etc.) in order for the population to be an effective source for re- colonization of the upper watershed. Otherwise, no significant conservation constraints have been identified. Author: johnsmjj Subject: Sticky Note Date: 8/30/2011 3:32:56 PM This note is not consistent with the table. steelhead? The study will use a combination of radio tags, ▇▇▇▇ tags and other identification methods as needed to determine the fate of recycled summer steelhead. WDFW proposes that the study be conducted by USGS. While previous studies have determined how many recycled fish returned to the separator at the Cowlitz Salmon Hatchery, these studies have not accurately determined the fate of fish that did not arrive at the separator. This study will ensure that data on the fate of recycled summer steelhead are collected and will be used to guide future management decisions about recycling summer steelhead in the Cowlitz basin. The study proposes to recycle up to 500 summer-run steelhead one time, using a combination of radio tags, ▇▇▇▇ tags and opercula punches to allow for evaluation. Returns to hatchery facilities, lower river weirs and harvest rates will be enumerated. The study will begin when WDFW secures funding. The impact of recycling (presumed to be increased pHOS) will require reducing the currently proposed program from 650,000 to 625,892 summer steelhead.
View Source

Related to Management Targets

  • Targets Seller’s supplier diversity spending target for Work supporting the construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date is ____ percent (___%) as measured relative to Seller’s total expenditures on construction of the Project prior to the Commercial Operation Date, and;

  • Performance Targets Threshold, target and maximum performance levels for each performance measure of the performance period are contained in Appendix B.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is a NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASPP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram, , the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”), and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by LEA pursuant to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. ▇▇▇ shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by ▇▇▇.

  • Performance Management 17.1 The Contractor will appoint a suitable Account Manager to liaise with the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager. Any/all changes to the terms and conditions of the Agreement will be agreed in writing between the Authority’s Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor’s appointed representative. 17.2 The Contractor will ensure that there will be dedicated resources to enable the smooth running of the Framework Agreement and a clear plan of contacts at various levels within the Contractor's organisation. Framework Public Bodies may look to migrate to this Framework Agreement as and when their current contractual arrangements expire. The Contractor will where necessary assign additional personnel to this Framework Agreement to ensure agreed service levels are maintained and to ensure a consistent level of service is delivered to all Framework Public Bodies. 17.3 In addition to annual meetings with the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager, the Contractor is expected to develop relationships with nominated individuals within each of the Framework Public Bodies to ensure that the level of service provided on a local basis is satisfactory. Where specific problems are identified locally, the Contractor will attempt to resolve such problems with the nominated individual within that organisation. The Authority's Strategic Contract Manager will liaise (or meet as appropriate) regularly with the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager, and where common problems are identified, it will be the responsibility of the Contractor to liaise with the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager to agree a satisfactory course of action. Where the Contractor becomes aware of a trend that would have a negative effect on one or more of the Framework Public Bodies, they should immediately notify the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager to discuss corrective action. 17.4 Regular meetings, frequency to be advised by Framework Public Body, will be held between the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager and the Contractor's representative to review the performance of their Call-Off Contract(s) under this Framework Agreement against the agreed service levels as measured through Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). Reports will be provided by the Contractor to the Framework Public Bodies' Contract Manager at least 14 days prior to the these meetings. 17.5 Performance review meetings will also be held annually, between the Authority's Strategic Contract Manager and the Contractor's representative to review the performance of the Framework Agreement against the agreed service levels as measured through Key Performance Indicators. A summary of the quarterly reports will be provided by the Contractor at least 14 days prior to these meetings. 17.6 The Authority will gather the outputs from contract management to review under the areas detailed in the table below. Provision of management reports 90% to be submitted within 10 working days of the month end Report any incident affecting the delivery of the Service(s) to the Framework Public Body 100% to be reported in writing to FPB within 24 hours of the incident being reported by telephone/email Prompt payment of sub-contractors and/or consortia members (if applicable). Maximum of 30 from receipt of payment from Framework Public Bodies, 10 days target 100% within 30 days

  • Program Goals CalHFA MAC envisions that these monies would be used to complement other federal or lender programs designed specifically to stabilize communities by providing assistance to homeowners who have suffered a financial hardship and as a result are no longer financially able to afford their first-lien mortgage loan payments or their Property Expenses when associated with a Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) Home Equity Conversion Mortgages (“HECM”) loan, only.