Logic Sample Clauses

Logic. Encounter timeliness is determined by calculating the percent of encounter lines that are accepted by CHAMPS by the end of the month following the month of adjudication. This calculation is done each month. As an example, on December 15th the query is run to determine what percent of the encounters adjudicated during October were accepted by CHAMPS by November 30th. The analyses are only run once for each adjudication month. The adjudication date is taken from the DTP segment of the 2430 loop or the DTP segment of the 2330B loop. (The data warehouse uses the date from the line if it is available otherwise it populates with the claim date.) For claims that are not adjudicated, Medicaid Health Plans populate the DTP field with the date they created the encounter for submission. The Medicaid Health Plans are required to report this field and the encounter is rejected if neither DTP field is populated (error 2650). Currently, for mental health encounters this error is informational only. However, PIHPs will also be required to populate this field with either the adjudication date or the date the encounter was created for submission. These queries only include consumers who are Medicaid eligible at the time of services, with Scope = 1 or 2 and coverage = D, F, K, P, or T. The queries include all PIHP submitted encounters, both mental health and substance abuse. Concerns have been raised that the timeliness measure will penalize PIHPs for correcting encounter errors. To address this, the query will include all active encounters (original and replacement) except those replacement encounters that are not timely. In this way, PIHPs will not be discouraged from reporting replacements that require additional time to research or resolve. The Department plans on continuing these test analyses through November 2019. The first production analyses will be run in December 2019. PIHP MEDICAID UTILIZATION AND AGGREGATE NET COST REPORT‌ This report provides the aggregate Medicaid service data necessary for MDHHS management of PIHP contracts and rate-setting by the actuary. In the case of a regional entity, the PIHP must report this data as an aggregation of all Medicaid services provided in the service area by its CMHSP partners. This report includes Medicaid Substance Use Disorder services provided in the service area. The data set reflects and describes the support activity provided to or on behalf of Medicaid beneficiaries, except Children’s Waiver beneficiaries. Refer to ...
Logic. Schedule shall use retained logic during the development and updating of the schedule. Any function that would cause the retained logic of the logic network to be overridden is prohibited unless approved, in writing and in advance, by the Architect and Owner. Schedule shall include date of Notice to Proceed, date of Substantial Completion, and date of Final Completion in accordance with Contract Documents. Critical path shall be clearly indicated on Schedule. Not more than twenty (20) percent of the progress activities shall be on the critical path at any one time. Not more than five (5) percent of the total individual activities may exceed $25,000 or 14 calendar days (per activity) without prior approval of Architect and Owner.
Logic. Schedule shall use retained logic during the development and updating of the schedule. Any function that would cause the retained logic of the logic network to be overridden is prohibited unless approved, in writing and in advance, by the Architect and Owner.
Logic. ✜ Student marketplace demands tailoring of degree types and paths, along with coursework, to individual interests -> higher, more specialized degrees, with marketability -> undergraduate programs with graduate program linkages -> shortened, more affordable training Reimagining The Education Enterprise Learning Spheres| Experiential TRANS- DISCIPLINARY PERSONALIZED EXPERIENTIAL LIFELONG EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING ✜ Clinical Affiliates ✜ Community Outreach ✜ JeffHOPE ✜ Refugee Health Partners ✜ Jefferson Clowns for Medicine ✜ JeffEARTH ✜ JeffMENTORS ….and many more ✜ Industry Linkages Reimagining The Education Enterprise Experiential| More Training Sites & Applied Science Jefferson Clinical Affiliates & Mergers PhilaU Industry & Academic Partners Reimagining The Education Enterprise Learning Spheres| Lifelong TRANS- DISCIPLINARY PERSONALIZED EXPERIENTIAL LIFELONG LIFELONG LEARNING ✜ Curriculum redesign, cognizant of the educational path before and after ✜ Coordination with undergraduate and post-graduate programs ✜ Capturing the full educational continuum, envisioning a new future for CME and Executive Degrees Reimagining The Scientific Enterprise Research Spheres | Value Creation VALUE CREATION
Logic. In Section 3 the major features of networked and partitioned multi-core system architecture are presented. As shown in Figure 2, this system architecture is composed by a COTS device with a processing system (PS) and a programmable logic (PL). In addition, this system architecture is partitioned by a hypervisor to enable the implementation of a wide variety of functionalities with different criticality on the same embedded computing platform. These partitions can be integrated indistinctly in the PS or the PL. In the PS, the partitions may be implemented into the cores of the device, whereas the PL supports the implementation of a single or multiple soft-core processors with independent memory (e.g., BRAM). These soft-core processors and the PL itself can be vulnerable to single event upsets (SEUs). SEUs are usually caused by the collision of cosmic particles and atoms and they may result in the failure of the BRAM, the electronic devices or the PL. Xilinx provides a solution to these failures, providing the soft error mitigation (SEM) IP core [38] for detecting and correcting SEUs in configuration memory of Xilinx FPGAs. SEM IP does not prevent soft-errors; however, it provides methods to manage their effects at system level.
Logic. The schedules shall divide the Work into activities with appropriate logic ties to show:
Logic. Figure 1 - Semantic Commitments of Theories of Vagueness ies that associate meanings of utterances with SINGLE PROPOSITIONS, where utterances are either true or false simpliciter. The most semantically simple amongst these is epistemicism. Also falling into this category are contextu- alist views. Contextualist positions can be thoroughly classical with regard to content and truth-value, but relativise truth-values and/or extensions to contexts. Epistemicist positions are free to do this also. The difference between them is that epistemicism addresses Sorites cases via ignorance of boundaries, whereas contextualism addresses them via minor changes in context mid-argument. The outlier in this group sits slightly higher in the tree and its position there is marked with a query. Indeed, the same theory is also marked on the other side of the tree. Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx’x verities account can be read fairly classically. On this reading, there are still only two truth values, but degrees of closeness to clear truth (verities) help us, for some purposes, to address gradience in our semantics in a way that speaking only in terms of absolute values cannot. There is, however, another reading (not necessarily Xxxxxxxxx’x) on which verities are taken to be something more akin to degrees of truth. Some discussion of verities will be made in §1.7, but a full discussion will not be conducted until chapter 8. There, I will argue for the reading of verities as relating to uncertainty (node [00]). The second broad category of theories (daughters of [10], bottom middle cluster) are slightly more complex. These theories associate meanings of sentences/utterances with MULTIPLE PROPOSITIONS (they differ on the status of these propositions and over whether they are all expressed). This broad category includes theories such as supervaluationism, plurivaluationism and nihilism.6 The difference between the previous category of theories and this one is that the first adopt a traditional stance towards truth as well as content. A proposition is expressed and it is either true or false. Multiple proposition theories are forced to say more about truth. If an utterance really expresses more than one proposition, each of which is true or false, then truth of the utterance may be defined over the truth-values of the propositions expressed (supervaluationism), or one may deny that any utterances containing vague terms are ever literally true or false (nihilism). Theories in the third category...
Logic. SIS, ESD and F&G logic will be developed from their respective cause and effect chart. Logic will be based on “function blocks” or similar and will be sufficiently detailed to permit trouble-shooting and future modification of the logic. Contractor will design trip and logic functions to the integrity level determined by the LOPA analysis. Specifically, for trips associated with the following rotating equipment in service common to liquefaction trains, Contractor will provide 2oo3 (two out of three) voting: ● Amine Circulation Pumps ● Amine Booster Pumps ● Regeneration Gas Compressors ● BOG Compressors
Logic. If considered as one big event (a one-off event) will be easier to get all contributors (their official sites) to release the data publicly All genomic data must be standards compliant - must include metadata
Logic. The Optivax adjuvant system is based on the nonionic block copolymer, P1005, which can be used in both aqueous and oil-containing vaccine formulations. The Optivax adjuvant routinely augments immune responses and could induce additional or different effector mechanisms. Mechanisms of action are not known but could include: