Feasibility and relevance. (Cf. Sections C and D of the Proposal Template) Experiments with low relevance for ORCA, with low chances for success or requiring excessive support from the ORCA partners will get a lower score.
Feasibility and relevance Sample Clauses
Related to Feasibility and relevance
Findings 2. Based on the information known by or provided to the Department, the following findings are asserted for purposes of this Contract:
Geotechnical 19 The A/E as required shall review past pavement, soil 20 and geology investigations, discuss past findings as 21 impacting the subject roadway project, and independently 22 perform design-needed geotechnical services including 23 development and implementation of a field investigation plan 24 involving any field data collection as deemed necessary, 25 development of a laboratory testing program to conduct soils 26 surface and subsurface characterization tests as applicable 1 to the needs of the project, development of seismic analysis 2 and design criteria in accordance with code requirements, 3 development of pavement condition studies to provide 4 recommendations concerning life cycle costs and 5 rehabilitation/reconstruction methods, and recommendations 6 for the design of foundations, embankment and excavation 7 procedures, settlement analysis, lateral, active, and passive 8 earth pressures, de-watering, landslide mapping, slope 9 stabilization, soil corrosion, erosion, sedimentation control 10 and other applicable design criteria as deemed necessary.
Geotechnical Investigation Perform in accordance with the City Design Manual and other City requirements as designated in writing by the Director.
Updated Information Submission by Developer The updated information submission by the Developer, including manufacturer information, shall occur no later than one hundred eighty (180) Calendar Days prior to the Trial Operation. Developer shall submit a completed copy of the Large Generating Facility data requirements contained in Appendix 1 to the Large Facility Interconnection Procedures. It shall also include any additional information provided to Connecting Transmission Owner for the Interconnection Feasibility Study and Interconnection Facilities Study. Information in this submission shall be the most current Large Generating Facility design or expected performance data. Information submitted for stability models shall be compatible with NYISO standard models. If there is no compatible model, the Developer will work with a consultant mutually agreed to by the Parties to develop and supply a standard model and associated information. If the Developer’s data is different from what was originally provided to Connecting Transmission Owner and NYISO pursuant to an Interconnection Study Agreement among Connecting Transmission Owner, NYISO and Developer and this difference may be reasonably expected to affect the other Parties’ facilities or the New York State Transmission System, but does not require the submission of a new Interconnection Request, then NYISO will conduct appropriate studies to determine the impact on the New York State Transmission System based on the actual data submitted pursuant to this Article 24.3. Such studies will provide an estimate of any additional modifications to the New York State Transmission System, Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities, or System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades based on the actual data and a good faith estimate of the costs thereof. The Developer shall not begin Trial Operation until such studies are completed. The Developer shall be responsible for the cost of any modifications required by the actual data, including the cost of any required studies.
Confidentiality and Safeguarding Information 1. Each Party may have access to confidential information made available by the other. The provisions of the Florida Public Records Act, Chapter 119, F.S., and other applicable state and federal laws will govern disclosure of any confidential information received by the State of Florida.
Quality- and Cost-Based Selection Except as ADB may otherwise agree, the Borrower shall apply quality- and cost-based selection for selecting and engaging consulting services.
Geological and Archeological Specimens If, during the execution of the Work, the Contractor, any Subcontractor, or any servant, employee, or agent of either should uncover any valuable material or materials, such as, but not limited to, treasure trove, geological specimens, archival material, archeological specimens, or ore, the Contractor acknowledges that title to the foregoing is vested in the Owner. The Contractor shall notify the Owner upon the discovery of any of the foregoing, shall take reasonable steps to safeguard it, and seek further instruction from the Design Professional. Any additional cost incurred by the Contractor shall be addressed under the provision for changed conditions. The Contractor agrees that the Geological and Water Resources Division and the Historic Preservation Division of the Georgia Department of Natural Resources may inspect the Work at reasonable times.
Confidentiality and Publication Subject to the remaining provisions of this clause 8, each Party will treat all Confidential Information of any other Party as confidential and will not, without the consent of the other relevant Party, disclose or permit the same either to be disclosed to third parties or to be used, except solely as contemplated by this Agreement. Each Party must use all reasonable endeavours to ensure that its representatives comply with the obligations of confidentiality imposed upon it under this clause 8 as if those representatives were bound in the same way. Each Party must advise each other Party as soon as practicably possible of any breach of any confidentiality obligations under this Agreement of which it becomes aware. A Party may disclose Confidential Information if required to do so by law or to its professional advisers, subject to the relevant adviser being bound by similar obligations of confidentiality, or if necessary, entering into an appropriate confidentiality undertaking. A Party may publish the Project IP, subject to it complying with the following: prior to any publication, the Party must provide the other Party with full details of the Project IP it proposes to publish and the nature of the publication; and the other Party must notify the first Party whether permission to publish has been granted or refused within 30 days of the request (or such other period as may be set out at Item 7 of the Schedule) (Period); and if the other Party fails to notify the first Party of its decision under clause 8.5(b) within the Period shall be deemed to have consented to the proposed publication by the first Party; and any other Party may only refuse a request to publish if, in that other Party’s reasonable opinion, the publication is likely to jeopardise: the protection of Project IP (as applicable) under any statute of monopoly; or the successful commercialisation of the Project IP by the Party with such rights, or
Equality and Diversity 36.2.1 The Supplier shall:
Confidentiality and Use In accordance with Article 3(7) of the IGA, all information exchanged pursuant to the IGA is subject to the confidentiality and other protections provided for in the Convention (hereinafter “Confidentiality Protections”), including the provisions limiting the use of the information exchanged. The Competent Authorities intend to maintain appropriate safeguards and infrastructure as described in Article 3(8) of the IGA (“Data Safeguards”).
