EVALUATION MATRIX Sample Clauses

EVALUATION MATRIX. Each teacher’s performance rating will be combined with the assessment of student growth measures to produce the summative evaluation rating, based upon the following “Evaluation Matrix”: Student Growth Teacher Performance 4 3 2 1 Above Accomplished Accomplished Skilled Developing Expected Skilled Skilled Developing Developing Below Developing Developing Ineffective Ineffective After final ratings for teachers are determined, the Ohio eTPES (electronic Teacher and Principal Evaluation System) is the method by which the district will report teacher final summative ratings to the State. eTPES will calculate the Studetn Growth Measures 50% from manually entered data and downloaded data (Value-Added or Vendor Assessment). The system wil then calculate the Final Summative Rating (using the Teacher Performance 50% and the Student Growth Measure 50%) for each educator.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
EVALUATION MATRIX. Criteria Puppet Chef Ansible Docker Xxxxxxx Kubernetes Riverbend Cost 5 2 5 3 5 5 1 Scalability 5 4 1 4 4 5 4 Flexibility 5 4 5 4 4 5 3 Interoperabili ty 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 Learning Curve 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 Functionality 5 4 4 4 4 4 3 TOTAL 29 23 25 24 26 27 19 Overall, Puppet is the optimal choice as a cloud deployment tool for MyMedsTracker.
Sample 1
EVALUATION MATRIX. EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORE Responsiveness of Proposal Pass/Fail Financial Stability of the Proposer Pass/Fail Quality of proposed M/WBE Participation aligned with the project scope. Pass/Fail Qualifications, experience and successful track record of performing delinquent government collections. 20 A detailed description that clearly defines the method of approach that will be utilized in the successful performance of the master agreement 35 Demonstrated experience of the Proposer working for organizations of a similar size to the City 5 Price Proposal 20 Local Preference 5 TOTAL SCORE 100
Sample 1

Related to EVALUATION MATRIX

  • Evaluation Cycle Goal Setting and Development of the Educator Plan

  • Evaluation Criteria 5.2.1. The responses will be evaluated based on the following: (edit evaluation criteria below as appropriate for your project)

  • Performance Evaluation The Department may conduct a performance evaluation of Contractor’s Services, including Contractor’s Subcontractors. Results of any evaluation may be made available to Contractor upon request.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Performance Evaluations 34.1. The Contractor is subject to an annual performance evaluation to be conducted by NYCDOT pursuant to the PPB Rules.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.