Corroboration Sample Clauses
A Corroboration clause requires that certain facts, statements, or evidence presented in a contract or legal proceeding be supported by additional, independent proof. In practice, this means that a party cannot rely solely on their own assertions; they must provide supporting documentation, witness testimony, or other forms of verification to substantiate their claims. The core function of this clause is to enhance the reliability and credibility of information, reducing the risk of false or unsubstantiated statements and ensuring that decisions are based on verifiable evidence.
Corroboration is not required for a statement made by the accused before the court by which the accused is being tried, for statements made prior to or contemporaneously with the act, or for statements offered under a rule of evidence other than that pertaining to the admissibility of admissions or confessions.
Corroboration of a complaint letter means that there is at least one additional, credible verbal or written report, statement, or other documentation of the incident in question, or of similar behavior by the Flight Attendant. Corroboration shall also be required if the initial report of inappropriate conduct by a Flight Attendant has been made by a company employee (i.e., gate agent, manager).
Corroboration. Coaching 7. Monitoring/Adjusting
Corroboration. The AAT noted that ▇▇▇▇▇ had not called as a witness the man with whom she claimed she had been living. In those cir cumstances, the AAT said, it was entitled to draw the inference that his evidence would not have assisted her case; and the AAT referred to several judicial decis ions — ▇▇▇▇▇ v ▇▇▇▇▇▇ (1959) 101 CLR 298; ▇ ’▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇ Reichard [1975] VR 916; and Girlock (Sales) Pty Ltd v HurrelK 1982) 149 CLR 155. ‘Objective indicia’ of a relationship After referring to the Federal Court de cision in Lym m (1983) 20 SSR 225, the Tribunal said that social attitudes to de facto relationships were changing quickly. These relationships were being recognised in the context of adoption, in vitro fer tilisation and anti-discrimination laws. The AAT continued: As the community becomes more accepting of people living in de facto situations, it becomes less likely that a woman living in a de facto situation will adopt the name of the man with whom she lives, or that the couple will hold themselves out as being married. Married people now sometimes re ▇▇▇▇ separate names and often keep their financial affairs separate. Thus it becomes more difficult to determine from objec tive indicia which couples are living in a (Reasons, para. 37) But the AAT concluded that the evi dence in the present case showed that, at the time when the decision under review was made (30 August 1983), ▇▇▇▇▇ was living with B as his wife on a bona fide domestic basis although not legally mar ried to him. That evidence included ‘an association lasting 8 years, many changes of address, some shared social life, emo tional support, together with [the various statements made by ▇▇▇▇▇ over the years] ’: Reasons, para. 38. Recovery of past payments The Tribunal observed that the evidence indicated that there had been a de facto relationship between ▇▇▇▇▇ and B for some years before August 1983. Con sequently, the rate of ▇▇▇▇▇’ unemploy ment and special benefits should have taken account of B’s income;and she had probably been overpaid. However, the evidence showed that, at the date of the hearing, ▇▇▇▇▇ was in a poor financial position, and, therefore, it would have been inconsistent with welfare principles to threaten her newly established indepen dence by demanding repayment of moneys received by her or even by making deduc tions from her current payments which would make it impossible for her to con tinue her present living arrangements. (Reasons, para. 40) Formal decision The AAT aff...
Corroboration of results with alternative mathematical models needs to consider the confidence in these alternative models and how that confidence was reached. (Section 5.4.1(c)(2))