Common use of Consortium Model Clause in Contracts

Consortium Model. Post-tender clarifications Appendix A - Social Enterprise Consortia Building Programme – Clarifications This template should be populated to document any minor changes that are necessary in order to update your consortium’s Stage 2 RFP submission as a result of the recent delay. These changes will be considered by the Authority against your original submission and if acceptable (see below) will be bound within your Grant Agreement. You are not required to re-write your entire submission – the minor changes should be clearly and concisely documented so that it is apparent what specific elements have been affected. For example, if you intended to launch a website in March but now need to launch it in June you should reflect the change to the timescales. You should also mention if any related activity has been affected. You do not need to restate why you need the website, nor how you intend to carry out the launch etc. Whilst this template is necessary to ensure the resulting Grant Agreement is accurate, you should only document those changes that are legitimate and necessary. This does not represent an opportunity to alter or amend your proposal. The grants to be awarded as part of the NOMS CFO Social Enterprise Consortia Building Programme are the result of a fair and open competition. As part of this evaluation process your submission was scored on the merits of the proposal it contained, and it is this score that has resulted in your submission being successful (and hence other submissions not being successful). The information provided below therefore cannot reflect a material change to your original Stage 2 RFP submission. The information provided will be reviewed by the Authority to ensure that it does not represent a material change to your RFP Stage 2 submission. For example, your Stage 2 RFP submission may have contained provision to support the launch of a website in March. It would not be deemed permissible to change this element to something substantially different, such as recruiting another member of staff. In addition to the above, particular elements of your Stage 2 RFP submission have been flagged for your attention below. These either:  represent areas for clarification that were noted as part of the evaluation process (and require a degree of further explanation);  or are areas that the Authority has noted as potentially needing to be updated as a result of the delay. As such they should also be addressed within this template and be either addressed in their own right or as part of the update activity mentioned above.

Consortium Model. Delivery partner roles as per consortia matrix Deliver y Deliver y Deliver y Deliver y Deliver y Central support services eg; The Learning Partnership Deliver y Deliver y Deliver y Deliver y SAFER STRONGER CORNWALL CONSORTIUM Post-tender clarifications Appendix A - Social Enterprise Consortia Building Programme – Clarifications This template should be populated to document any minor changes that are necessary in order to update your consortium’s Stage 2 RFP submission as a result of the recent delay. These changes will be considered by the Authority against your original submission and if acceptable (see below) will be bound within your Grant Agreement. You are not required to re-write your entire submission – the minor changes should be clearly and concisely documented so that it is apparent what specific elements have been affected. For example, if you intended to launch a website in March but now need to launch it in June you should reflect the change to the timescales. You should also mention if any related activity has been affected. You do not need to restate why you need the website, nor how you intend to carry out the launch etc. Whilst this template is necessary to ensure the resulting Grant Agreement is accurate, you should only document those changes that are legitimate and necessary. This does not represent an opportunity to alter or amend your proposal. The grants to be awarded as part of the NOMS CFO Social Enterprise Consortia Building Programme are the result of a fair and open competition. As part of this evaluation process your submission was scored on the merits of the proposal it contained, and it is this score that has resulted in your submission being successful (and hence other submissions not being successful). The information provided below therefore cannot reflect a material change to your original Stage 2 RFP submission. The information provided will be reviewed by the Authority to ensure that it does not represent a material change to your RFP Stage 2 submission. For example, your Stage 2 RFP submission may have contained provision to support the launch of a website in March. It would not be deemed permissible to change this element to something substantially different, such as recruiting another member of staff. In addition to the above, particular elements of your Stage 2 RFP submission have been flagged for your attention below. These either:  represent areas for clarification that were noted as part of the evaluation process (and require a degree of further explanation);  or are areas that the Authority has noted as potentially needing to be updated as a result of the delay. As such they should also be addressed within this template and be either addressed in their own right or as part of the update activity mentioned above.