Consequences for the new approach Sample Clauses

Consequences for the new approach. ‌ For the enhanced deployment we decided to have a requirements document (see Section 4.2.2), a Problem Frames model (see Section 4.2.1) and a speci- ficiation document (see Chapter 5) in comparison to just a Problem Frames model during the pilot deployment (see also Figure 3.4 in Chapter 3). We use Problem Frames for the problem analysis. In addition to the Prob- lem Frames model a requirments document is produced. The requirements document is the basis to obtain invariants that can be used in Event-B by formalizing these requirements (see Section 4.2.3). These invariants are later used in the Event-B model (see Chapter 6). The Problem Frames model contains already information which is used in the specification document. A description of the whole development process can be found in Chapter 3. During the enhanced deployment we decided to use a suitable structure dur- ing the Problem Frames analysis without constraining the structure for the following phases. In the requirements document we refuse to assume any design at all and describe the requirements without using internal variables.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Consequences for the new approach

  • Consequences for Non-Compliance If the Department has reason to believe that the District is not in substantial compliance with one or more of the statutory or regulatory requirements applicable to the District, the Department shall notify the District that it has ninety (90) days after the date of notice to come into compliance. If, at the end of the ninety-day period, the Department finds the District is not substantially in compliance with the applicable statutory or regulatory requirements, meaning that the District has not yet taken the necessary measures to ensure that it meets the applicable legal requirements as soon as practicable, the District may be subject to the interventions specified in sections 00-00-000 through 00-00-000, C.R.S. If the District has failed to comply with the provisions of article 44 of title 22 or article 45 of title 22, the District does not remedy the noncompliance within ninety (90) days and loss of accreditation is required to protect the interests of the students and parents of students enrolled in the District public schools, the Department may recommend to the State Board that the State Board remove the District’s accreditation. If the Department determines that the District has substantially failed to meet requirements specified in this accreditation contract and that immediate action is required to protect the interests of the students and parents of students enrolled in the District’s public schools, the Department may lower the District’s accreditation category.

  • Consequences of non-compliance If a beneficiary breaches any of its obligations under this Article, the grant may be reduced (see Article 43). Such breaches may also lead to any of the other measures described in Chapter 6.

  • Financial Consequences for Nonperformance The State reserves the right to withhold payment or implement other appropriate remedies, such as contract termination or nonrenewal, when the Contractor has failed to perform under or comply with the provisions of this contract. When or if the Contractor fails to perform or comply with provisions of this contract, the Contractor has ten (10) calendar days from receipt of Complaint to Vendor Form (PUR 7017) to comply as instructed within the notice. An amount of $500.00 may be assessed for each day the Contractor is delinquent after the ten (10) day notice period ends, and that amount may be withheld from a Contractor’s invoice. The rights and remedies of the State in this paragraph are not considered penalties and are in addition to any other rights and remedies provided by law.

  • Financial Consequences of Non-Performance If the corrective action plan is unacceptable to the Department or Customer, or fails to remedy the performance deficiencies, the Contractor will be assessed a non-performance retainage equivalent to 10% of the total invoice amount or as specified in the Contract. The retainage will be applied to the invoice for the then-current billing period. The retainage will be withheld until the Contractor resolves the deficiency. If the deficiency is subsequently resolved, the Contractor may invoice the Customer for the retained amount during the next billing period. If the Contractor is unable to resolve the deficiency, the funds retained will be forfeited.

  • Consequences of Events of Default and Corrective Action If an Event of Default occurs, the Province may, at any time, take one or more of the following actions:

  • Remedies for Noncompliance If a Contractor fails to comply with Federal statutes, regulations or the terms and conditions of a Federal award, HUD or the City of Xxxxx may impose additional conditions, as described in 2 CFR 200.207 Specific Conditions. If HUD or the City of Xxxxx determines that noncompliance cannot be remedied by imposing additional conditions, HUD or the City of Xxxxx may take one or more of the following actions, as appropriate in the circumstances:

  • Remedies for Non-Compliance The Recipient agrees that if FTA determines that the Recipient or a Third Party Participant receiving federal assistance under 49 U.S.C. chapter 53 is not in compliance with 49 C.F.R. part 655, the Federal Transit Administrator may bar that Recipient or Third Party Participant from receiving all or a portion of the federal transit assistance for public transportation it would otherwise receive.

  • METHODS FOR THE ELIMINATION OF DOUBLE TAXATION 1. In China, double taxation shall be eliminated as follows:

  • Consequences of Default Upon the occurrence of any Event of Default, as defined in the Revenue Sharing Agreement:

  • EVENTS OF DEFAULTS AND CONSEQUENCES 9.1 Subject to the Force Majeure clause, the Promoter shall be considered under a condition of Default, in the following events:

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.