Certification Group/Category Rating Statement Provider Sample Clauses

Certification Group/Category Rating Statement Provider. Where there is reference to OSSTF Certification Rating Statements, the local parties will amend that language to insert “or Qualifications Evaluation Council of Ontario (QECO)”.
Certification Group/Category Rating Statement Provider. School Boards will recognize the Qualifications Evaluation Council of Ontario (QECO) as the provider of new qualification rating statements. Notwithstanding, existing OSSTF Certification Rating Statements will continue to be recognized, unless or until a QECO statement has been provided.
Certification Group/Category Rating Statement Provider. School Boards will recognize the Qualifications Evaluation Council of Ontario (QECO) as the provider of new qualification rating statements. Notwithstanding, existing OSSTF Certification Rating Statements will continue to be recognized, unless or until a QECO statement has been provided. dŚĞ WĂƌƚŝĞƐ ŚĂǀĞ ĂŐƌĞĞĚ ƚŽ ƉĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚĞE mŝploŶye e ƚŚĞ >ŝĨĞ ĂŶĚ ,OSĞSTĂF EůLHƚT͟Ś ĞdƐƌƚƵĂƐďƚů ŝ͞ƐŚĞĚ KĐƚŽďĞƌ ϲ͕ ϮϬϭϲ͘ d and the bargaining units benefit plan commenced participation in the OSSTF ELHT shall be referred to ŚĞƌĞŝŶ ĂƐ ƚŚĞ ͞WĂƌƚŝĐŝƉĂƚŝŽŶ ĂƚĞ͘͟
Certification Group/Category Rating Statement Provider. Where there is reference to OSSTF Certification Rating Statements, the local parties will amend

Related to Certification Group/Category Rating Statement Provider

  • Insurance Carrier Rating Coverages provided by Contractor must be underwritten by an insurance company deemed acceptable to the State of Washington’s Office of Risk Management. Insurance coverage shall be provided by companies authorized to do business within the State of Washington and rated A- Class VII or better in the most recently published edition of Best’s Insurance Rating. Enterprise Services reserves the right to reject all or any insurance carrier(s) with an unacceptable financial rating.

  • Regulatory Good Standing Certification - Explanation - Continued If Vendor responded to the prior attribute that "No", Vendor is not in good standing, Vendor must provide an explanation of that lack of good standing here for TIPS consideration.