AWARD EVALUATION Clause Samples
AWARD EVALUATION. 13.1 The bid will be awarded in accordance with section 13.4 of the “Instructions to Bidders” attachment found in Ebid and with consideration given to each of the following factors:
13.1.1 Pricing from the Ebid line items and any additional fees;
13.1.2 Ability, capacity and skill of the Bidder to comply with the specifications and perform the work required and within the time specified for a given project;
13.1.3 Character, integrity, reputation, judgment, work related experience and efficiency of the Bidder;
AWARD EVALUATION. 9.1 The award determination will be made in accordance with section 13. BID EVALUATION AND AWARD, 13.4 of the “Instructions to Bidders” and also with consideration given to the following factors:
9.1.1 Line Item pricing in Ebid for the Market Basket and % of discount submitted in Ebid.
9.1.2 Confirmation of ability to deliver items within the desired timeframes listed herein these Specifications for stock and non-stock items; and
9.1.3 Link to current catalog provided for review by the Owners.
9.2 The Owners reserves the right to award contract(s) to more than one Vendor if it is deemed in the best interest of the Owners to do so as to avoid supply shortages and delivery delays. END OF SPECIFICATIONS
Attachment A This chart is a list of other items that are commonly purchased by the Owners. Please complete the last 2 columns and submit with your response in the Supplier Response Attachment section of Ebid. If necessary, include a separate sheet to provide additional information about the proposed item. VENDOR’S RESPONSE Manufacturer Name & Item Description Quantity (approx.) UOM Sizes are (approx.) Color(s) Item Characteristics List Manufacturer Name & Item Number Catalog % Discount 1 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #101K-OR or Equal Orange Watch Cap (stocking cap) 2 DOZ N/A Orange 2 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #C5B or Equal Comb (plastic, pocket) 20 CS 5” Black 3 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #62F or Equal Polypropylene Fork 11 CS Orange Dishwasher safe, Unbreakable 4 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #62TS or Equal Polypropylene Teaspoon 11 CS Orange Dishwasher safe, Unbreakable 5 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #726B or Equal Tumbler Polypropylene 6 CS 12 oz. Buff Dishwasher safe, Unbreakable 6 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #9314-00 or Equal ▇▇▇▇ Hair Clippers 14 SET 6-10 pc N/A Both corded and cordless sets 7 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #BBNR or Equal Basketball Net Replacement 15 EA Standard White 8 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #BT2040-OR or Equal Towel 2 DOZ 20” x 40” Orange 9 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #NEEDLE6 or Equal Inflating Needle 2 CS 10 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #TC12 or Equal Toenail Clippers 1 CS 3.25% Does not contain files 11 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #NSTB or Equal No Shank Toothbrush 3 CS Must be non-shank. Clear -FDA approved translucent material -Reusable-will last as long as a standard toothbrush -Individually wrapped 12 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #SBHK-5000 or Equal Personal Protection Kit 75 KIT N/A N/A Please attach a separate sheet for what your kit contains. 13 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #BHK-100 or Equal Blood Spill Kit 40 KIT N/A N/A Please attach a separate sheet for what your kit contains. 14 ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ #82221EE or Equal Steel Toe Boot 10 PR All Sizes,...
AWARD EVALUATION. 5.1 Bid will be awarded based on the following:
5.1.1 The lowest responsible, responsive Bidder whose bid will be most advantageous to the Owners, and as the Owners deems will best serve the requirements and interests of the Owners;
5.1.2 Vendor’s performance from past.
AWARD EVALUATION. 3.1 The lowest responsible, responsive Bidder whose bid will be most advantageous to the City, and as the City deems will best serve the requirements and interests of the City.
AWARD EVALUATION. 13.1 The bid will be awarded in accordance with section 13.4 of the “Instructions to Bidders” attachment found in Ebid and with consideration given to each of the following factors:
13.1.1 Pricing from the Ebid line items and any additional fees;
13.1.2 Ability, capacity and skill of the Bidder to comply with the specifications and perform the work required and within the time specified for a given project;
13.1.3 Character, integrity, reputation, judgment, work related experience and efficiency of the Bidder;
13.1.4 Equipment list submitted by Bidder showing sufficient vehicles, tools and items to perform the services as outlined in the bid;
13.1.5 Quality of the Contractor’s performance of previous projects; and
13.1.6 Favorable information obtained from any reference checks that are performed.
13.2 Contracts resulting from bid responses shall not be on an all-or-none basis, and may be awarded to several bidders.
13.3 The Owners may make any investigation deemed necessary to determine the ability of a Bidder to perform in accordance with the specifications;
13.4 The Owners reserve the right to reject a bid if the pricing is deemed to be not fair and reasonable and/or if there is a lack of equipment to perform the requirements of the resulting contract; and
13.5 The Owners further reserve the right to analyze bid responses in detail and to award contracts which the Owners believe to be in their best interest; City of Lincoln, Nebraska, County of Lancaster, Public Building Commission
AWARD EVALUATION. 10.1 The lowest responsible, responsive Bidder whose bid will be most advantageous to the City, and as the City deems will best serve the requirements and interests of the City.
10.2 The Owners reserves the right to award contract(s) to more than one Vendor if it is deemed in the best interest of the Owners to do so as to avoid supply shortages and delivery delays. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION – City of Lincoln and/or Lancaster County, NE Issued 2/21/2017 In furtherance of Neb. Rev. Stat. §84-712 et seq., all proposals or responses received may be subject to a public records request. Responses to public records requests may include the entire proposal or response. Bidders must request that proprietary information be excluded from the posting. The bidder must identify the proprietary information, mark the proprietary information according to state law, and submit the proprietary information in a separate container or envelope marked conspicuously in black ink with the words "PROPRIETARY INFORMATION". The bidder must submit a detailed written showing that the release of the proprietary information would give a business advantage to named business competitor(s) and explain how the named business competitor(s) will gain an actual business advantage by disclosure of information. The mere assertion that information is proprietary or that a speculative business advantage might be gained is not sufficient. (See Attorney General Opinion No. 92068, April 27, 1992) THE BIDDER MAY NOT ASSERT THAT THE ENTIRE PROPOSAL IS PROPRIETARY. COST PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED PROPRIETARY AND ARE A PUBLIC RECORD IN THE STATE OF NEBRASKA. The City and/or County will then determine, in its discretion, if the interests served by nondisclosure outweighs any public purpose served by disclosure. (See Neb. Rev. Stat. § 84-712.05(3)) The Bidder will be notified of the agency's decision. Absent a City and/or County determination that information is proprietary, the City and/or County will consider all information a public record subject to release regardless of any assertion that the information is proprietary. If the agency determines it is required to release proprietary information, the bidder will be informed. It will be the bidder's responsibility to defend the bidder's asserted interest in nondisclosure. To facilitate such public postings, with the exception of proprietary information, the City of Lincoln and/or Lancaster County reserves a royalty- free, nonexclusive, and irrevocable...
AWARD EVALUATION. The Award criteria have been designed to assess the Most Economically Advantageous Tender (MEAT), taking into account a combination of Quality, Social Value and Price. The top scoring Applicant will be considered to have been successful.
AWARD EVALUATION. 4.1 Owner’s award based on the language stated in the “Instructions to Bidders”, Section