Alternative Standards Proposed by a Party Sample Clauses

Alternative Standards Proposed by a Party. Xxxxxxxxx may, no sooner than 180 days after the Effective Date, provide Xxxxxx with written notice of a proposed change to the reformulation standards or levels established by Section 2.2. Upon such notice, the Parties shall meet and confer for a period of 90 days to modify the Settlement Agreement. If, after meeting and conferring, the Parties are unable to reach an agreement, they shall seek the services of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS), San Francisco offices, to privately adjudicate the dispute, the costs of which shall be paid by Xxxxxxxxx.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Alternative Standards Proposed by a Party. Samovar may, no sooner than 180 days after the Effective Date, provide Xxxxxx with written notice of a proposed change to the reformulation standards or levels established by Section 2.1. Upon such notice, the Parties shall meet and confer for a period of 90 days to modify the Settlement Agreement. If, after meeting and conferring, the Parties are unable to reach an agreement, they shall seek the services of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS), San Francisco offices, to privately adjudicate the dispute, the costs of which shall be paid by Xxxxxxx.
Alternative Standards Proposed by a Party. Tao may, no sooner than 180 days after the Effective Date, provide Xxxxxx with written notice of a proposed change to the reformulation standards or levels established by Section 2.1. Upon such notice, the Parties shall meet and confer for a period of 90 days to modify the Settlement Agreement. If, after meeting and conferring, the Parties are unable to reach an agreement, they shall seek the services of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS), San Francisco offices, to privately adjudicate the dispute, the costs of which shall be paid by Tao.
Alternative Standards Proposed by a Party. Ustov may, no sooner than 180 days after the Effective Date, provide Xxxxxx with written notice of a proposed change to the reformulation standards or levels established by Section 2.2. Upon such notice, the Parties shall meet and confer for a period of 90 days to modify the Settlement Agreement. If, after meeting and conferring, the Parties are unable to reach an agreement, they shall seek the services of Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services (JAMS), San Francisco offices, to privately adjudicate the dispute, the costs of which shall be paid by Ustov.

Related to Alternative Standards Proposed by a Party

  • CHILD AND DEPENDENT ADULT/ELDER ABUSE REPORTING CONTRACTOR shall establish a procedure acceptable to ADMINISTRATOR to ensure that all employees, agents, subcontractors, and all other individuals performing services under this Agreement report child abuse or neglect to one of the agencies specified in Penal Code Section 11165.9 and dependent adult or elder abuse as defined in Section 15610.07 of the WIC to one of the agencies specified in WIC Section 15630. CONTRACTOR shall require such employees, agents, subcontractors, and all other individuals performing services under this Agreement to sign a statement acknowledging the child abuse reporting requirements set forth in Sections 11166 and 11166.05 of the Penal Code and the dependent adult and elder abuse reporting requirements, as set forth in Section 15630 of the WIC, and shall comply with the provisions of these code sections, as they now exist or as they may hereafter be amended.

  • Technical Objections to Grievance No grievance will be defeated or denied by any minor technical objection.

  • Proposed Corrective Action Plan Simultaneously with the submission of the Audit, the Recipient will submit to OCR for its review and approval a proposed Corrective Action Plan to address all inaccessible content and functionality identified during the Recipient’s Audit. The proposed Corrective Action Plan will set out a detailed schedule for: (1) addressing problems, taking into account identified priorities, with all corrective actions to be completed within 18 months of the date OCR approved the Corrective Action Plan; (2) setting up systems of accountability and verifying claims of accessibility by vendors or open sources; and setting up a system of testing and accountability to maintain the accessibility of all online content and functionality on an ongoing basis.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • Minimum Standard of Treatment 1. Each Party shall accord to a covered investment treatment in accordance with the customary international law minimum standard of treatment of aliens, including fair and equitable treatment and full protection and security.

  • Action Item Task MSU Status Comments I.1 The University will employ and empower a Clery Act compliance professional (CCP). The CCP must report to a Vice President (VP) or equivalent. The CCP must not be employed in or under the sole authority of the Office of the General Counsel (OGC). Implemented The Office of Audit, Risk and Compliance (OARC) hired a qualified candidate who began work in February 2020.

  • Benefit Level Two Health Care Network Determination Issues regarding the health care networks for the 2017 insurance year shall be negotiated in accordance with the following procedures:

  • Proposing Integration Activities in the Planning Submission No integration activity described in section 6.3 may be proposed in a CAPS unless the LHIN has consented, in writing, to its inclusion pursuant to the process set out in section 6.3(b).

  • Independence from Material Breach Determination Except as set forth in Section X.D.1.c, these provisions for payment of Stipulated Penalties shall not affect or otherwise set a standard for OIG’s decision that CHSI has materially breached this CIA, which decision shall be made at OIG’s discretion and shall be governed by the provisions in Section X.D, below.

  • Drug and Alcohol Testing – Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Employees required to have a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) are subject to pre-employment, post-accident, random and reasonable suspicion testing in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation rules, Coast Guard Regulations (46 CFR Part 16) or the Federal Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991. The testing will be conducted in accordance with current Employer policy.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.