Subject Claims definition

Subject Claims has the meaning given in Section 5.12.1 of the Credit Agreement.
Subject Claims has the meaning given in Section 5.12.1.
Subject Claims means any and all Claims (as defined below) against the Released Parties that arise out of or relate to the facts, acts, omissions, transactions, or occurrences that have been alleged to form a basis of liability, or that could have been alleged to form a basis of liability, in the Action related to the Covered Trusts (including facts, acts, omissions, transactions, or occurrences alleged to be, or that could be alleged to be, past, present, or future recurrences or continuations of the alleged breaches of contract or other duty at issue in the Action). For the avoidance of doubt, “Subject Claims” includes, but is not limited to, any and all Claims against the Released Parties that arise out of or relate to (i) documents missing or allegedly missing from loan files that were delivered to the Covered Trusts and/or the custodians for the Covered Trusts; (ii) breaches or alleged breaches of duty or of representations or warranties by the sellers of mortgage loans to the Covered Trusts; and/or

Examples of Subject Claims in a sentence

  • Montanore also moved for the district court to determine the validity of the Subject Claims.

  • On June 28, 2013, Montanore filed a condemnation action in federal court pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (Rule) 71.1, seeking to condemn easements and rights of way through the Subject Claims so that it could complete the Libby Tunnel in order to reach HR 133 and HR 134, and begin mining silver and copper.

  • In its order, the Montana Supreme Court noted that the state district “court’s reliance upon the 1989 mining lease as dispositive of Linds[e]y’s interests in the non-patented mining claims at issue [was] confusing and appear[ed] from a review of the provisions of the lease to be misplaced.” Montanore argues that the state district court’s reliance on the 1989 mining lease as dispositive of the validity of the Subject Claims was similarly misplaced.

  • SMITH, Circuit Judge:The causa belli in this case is the legal status of POPS claims 12–15 (the Subject Claims), which are four unpatented mining claims owned by defendant Arnold Bakie and his predecessors in interest since 1984, and then conveyed to defendant Optima, Inc., in October 2013.1 Plaintiff Montanore Minerals Corp.

  • The Subject Claims so identified on Exhibit A, as described in the Niven Affidavit, failed to include documentation that demonstrates that their claims are valid, and that they are entitled to payment under a settlement agreement with Debtors as required by Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 3001(c), Official Form B10, and the Settled Asbestos Claims Bar Date Order.


More Definitions of Subject Claims

Subject Claims means: any and all related pre- and post-arbitral proceedings or processes in or in connection with the Stated Claim, including the pursuit of costs or post-judgment remedies;
Subject Claims has the meaning set forth in Section 9(a).
Subject Claims has the meaning given in Section 11.14 of the Credit Agreement.
Subject Claims shall have the meaning set forth in Section 5.12.
Subject Claims has the meaning given in Section 9.1(b) of the Common Agreement.
Subject Claims has the meaning given in Section 11.19 of the Agreement.
Subject Claims has the meaning set forth in subsection 9.2D.