Use Case 2. Advanced configuration and supply scenario This scenario aims at users with the advanced profile who wish to exchange richer data and have more options to configure the workflow steps and use more granular modules than the basic scenario offers. They aim at more meaningful data that can be more useful for different purposes. This use case addresses the needs and wishes of advanced profile institutions who wish to have higher granularity and more advanced settings available for the mapping, enrichment and transformation of their data. This richer and more meaningful data needs to be converted into data that can be used and re-used by Europeana. This conversion requires decisions to be made by a data manager or other staff member who understands the provenance of the data and the working procedures of the content provider as well as the Europeana data model. This means that the conversion requires manual configuration. So in order to support this advanced scenario the XXX needs to support customisation, configuration and various modules for the most effective conversion of each content provider. On the other hand, the XXX must offer enough standardisation also within this advanced scenario in order to make the various steps of the conversion process more efficient than when they are performed without the XXX.
Use Case 2. Forced convection around a sphere The two solvers are compared, in terms of performance and accuracy, for the case of forced convection around a single sphere. Figure 2 shows that the old CFDEM solver (CFDEM-FD) tends to over predict the Nusselt number, while the HFD-IBM predicts a Nusselt number in the range of the correlations found in literature. It is noteworthy that the new HFD-IBM solver uses a significantly coarser mesh than the old CFDEM solver. Figure 2: Comparison of the current IB (denoted here as “FD” for fictitious domain) and the HFD-IBM in the case of forced convection.
Use Case 2
