TPY Sample Clauses

TPY. Inactive - Adopted by 267065260- P01 through issuance of 03-JSB- 168-OP. Revoked and replaced by 07-KLH-284. AM-04-200 11/24/2004 Approved by EPA as a site specific revision to the SIP effective 12/13/2005 . Issued to allow use of the biofilter as an equivalent means to control VOC emissions under s. NR 422.04(2)(d), Wis. Adm. Code. Active 267065260-P01 12/30/2004 Total Facility Inactive - Renewed with conditions revoked or revised through 07-KLH-284 upon issuance of 267065260-P10. 99-POY-132-OP 12/30/2004 Identical to 99-POY-132 Inactive - Issued concurrently with and adopted by 267065260- P01. Revoked and replaced upon issuance of 07-KLH-284. 99-DAA-220-OP 12/30/2004 Identical to 99-DAA-220 Inactive - Issued concurrently with and adopted by 267065260- P01 Revoked and replaced upon issuance of 07-KLH-284. 01-JSB-279-OP 12/30/2004 Identical to 01-JSB-279 Inactive - Issued concurrently with and adopted by 267065260- P01. Revoked and replaced by 07- KLH-284. 01-JSB-267-OP 12/30/2004 Identical to 01-JSB-267 Inactive - Issued concurrently with and adopted by 267065260- Permit/Order Number Issuance Date Sources Covered & Description1 Permit Status P01. Revoked and replaced by 07- KLH-284. 03-JSB-168-OP 12/30/2004 Identical to 01-JSB-168 Inactive - Issued concurrently with and adopted by 267065260- P01. Revoked and replaced by 07- KLH-284. 05-JSB-139 06/21/2005 Installation of 1 screen press (#291), 2 offset presses(#287,and #289), and 1 pad printer (#288) Inactive - Revoked and replaced by 07-KLH-284. 07-KLH-284 08/26/2011 Modification to include Plant-wide Applicability Limit Issued concurrently with and adopted by 267065260-P10. 267065260-P10 08/26/2011 Facility – wide operations with :Plant-wide Applicability Limit Primary Compliance Document †Conditions in these permits are no longer in effect. Attachment I contains a list of equipment current as of the date of issuance of this permit. An updated, detailed list of significant air pollution emissions units is available on site and upon request. Variances granted under ss. 299.83 Wis. Stats. - Green Tier, and NR 436.05, Wis. Adm. Code. This facility is granted variances from the following limitations and requirements as allowed under s. 299.83, Wis. Stats. and s. NR 436.05, Wis. Adm. Code.: • ss. NR 423.035, and 423.037, Wis. Adm. Code. – Industrial Cleaning RACT Rule • s. NR 422.145, Wis. Adm. Code. – Screen Printing RACT Rule • ss. NR 422.142, and 422.143, Wis. Adm. Code. – Lithographic Printing RACT Rule p...
View SourceView Similar (2)
TPY. The Annual network plan should also address NCore based lead monitors which must be operational by January 1, 2012. (OAQPS M22).
View Source
TPY. The NEC objects to the issuance of this Part 70 permit based upon the lack of a pre-construction permit for this source that was issued pursuant to an EPA-approved SIP. The NEC objects to the issuance of a part 70 permit for this source because the pre- and post-construction requirements for ozone monitoring were evaded with the assistance of the permitting agency. The NEC objects to the issuance of the Part 70 permit because the permitting authority concealed from the public and the EPA that the Eldorado Valley air-shed was already a non-attainment area for NOX which would have subjected the source to stricter requirements such as LAER and federally enforceable emission reduction offsets prior to the construction of the facility. The instant proposed permit evades the county’s 1979/81 EPA approved SIP by covering up the fact that ▇▇▇ has operated for years without complete conformity to the SIP and without full disclosure in this Part 70 administrative process. DAQM secretly concealed the NOX (and possible ozone) non-attainment status of the air-shed from the public for the sole purpose of strengthening the county’s tax base, and possibly worse. The August 19, 1997 ATC did not comply with the SIP requirement (§15.13) for Pre- construction (and Post-Construction) monitoring for ozone that was required since the VOC potential to emit exceeded 40 tons per year (tpy). This latest OP (December 13, 2000) does not comply with the §15.13 SIP requirement either. Despite previous knowledge of this SIP requirement, the APCD (DAQM) management continues to aid and abet the violation of federal law. Petitioners object to the statement regarding “supervisory and managerial instructions, verbal and/or written, issued before May 20, 2003.” That statement misleads in order to supersede and evade the agency’s own SIP and the CAA requirements for non-attainment pollutants in a non-attainment area. The statement is also an admission that there was no public involvement in the process of issuing “supervisory and managerial instructions, verbal and/or written, issued before May 20, 2003.” Clark County is required to provide the EPA with the opportunity to review new ATCs and modifications that involve major sources in Clark County. To the extent that the EPA was provided with that opportunity, then the EPA would have known about the issuance of the misleading August 19, 1997 permit. In the alternative, if the EPA was not notified, then DAQM has misled the EPA as well as the pub...
View Source
TPY. The Company will issue to TPY, upon receipt of TPY Initial Installment, a Warrant (as defined in the SPA) to purchase up to 550 Preferred B2 Shares, at the PPS. Upon receipt by the Company of any portion of the TPY Additional Amount, it shall issue to TPY an additional Warrant covering 20% of the additional portion of the TPY Additional Amount so transferred, in accordance with Sections 3.1 and 4.4.6 of the SPA (up to Warrants to purchase a maximum number of either: (i) 1,101 Preferred B2 Shares in case the Option is not exercised by TPY, or (ii) 1,762 Preferred B2 Shares in case the Option is exercised by TPY. Each of the aforesaid maximum number of additional shares includes the initial 550 Preferred B2 Shares referred to above).
View Source
TPY. This value is the total between onsite unpaved roads (2.57 TPY) and offsite unpaved roads (28.18) reported in Table 3-5. Table 3-5. PM10 Emissions from the Proposed Action and Alternative C compared with Oklahoma Emissions (percent calculations provided here are based on data reported in Table 3-4). SOURCE ANNUAL PM10 (TONS) % OF OKLAHOMA PM10 EMISSIONS % OF ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ COUNTY PM10 EMISSIONS 1 % OF ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ COUNTY PM10 EMISSIONS 1 Onsite Equipment and Activities 2 48.92 0.011 1.13 0.84 Onsite Fugitive Dust on Unpaved Roads 3 2.57 0.001 0.06 0.03 Offsite Fugitive Dust on Unpaved Roads 3 28.18 0.006 0.65 0.29 Total PM10 Emissions 4 79.67 0.018 1.84 0.81 1 Percentages are calculated as if all emissions would occur in each county. 2 Includes 6.33 TPY from mine ventilation PM10, 27.88 TPY of above-ground material handling PM10, 6.18 TPY of PM10 from wash plant processing emissions, and 8.53 TPY of wind-blown dust from stockpiles assuming a one acre stockpile. 3 An 80-percent emission control reduction has been taken for PM10 dust on unpaved roads. 4 Project emissions include onsite equipment and activities as noted in 1, wind-blown stockpiles and onsite and fugitive dust on unpaved roads. Although fugitive emissions from wind-blown stockpiles and fugitive dust on unpaved roads is not considered for purposes of minor source permitting. Calculations reported in Table 3-5 indicate that leasing and mining the LBA tract would contribute under 1% to State of Oklahoma and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ County emissions of PM10 and just under 2% to ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ County emissions of PM10. This incremental increase in PM10 emissions is not expected to change air quality on a state or county scale. However, coal haulage on un-paved roads near the LBA tract may result in localized increases of PM10 emissions that could be an intermittent nuisance to residents near and users of unpaved haul roads.
View Source

Related to TPY

  • Porcupine Site Highway 11 and the City of Timmins Thunder Bay and District Toronto/York-Peel

  • Intake Intake begins when you, or someone on your behalf, contacts the LIFE Provider or the Independent Enrollment Broker expressing interest in services. If it appears from this first conversation that you are potentially eligible, a LIFE Provider and Independent Enrollment Broker representative will contact you to explain the program, obtain further information about you, and to schedule in person or tele-visits. During these visits: • You will learn how the LIFE Program works, the services LIFE offers, and the answers to any questions you may have about LIFE. • The LIFE Provider and/or Independent Enrollment Broker will explain that if you enroll, you must agree that all of your healthcare services will be provided and/or coordinated by LIFE, including primary care and specialist physician services (other than emergency services). • The LIFE Provider will have you sign a release allowing the LIFE Provider to obtain your past medical records so the LIFE health team can fully assess your health conditions. You will be encouraged to visit the LIFE Center to see what it is like. If you are interested in enrolling, a LIFE Provider representative and the Independent Enrollment Broker will assist you with the enrollment process. You should be prepared to participate in phone calls and/or visits with both the LIFE Provider and Independent Enrollment Broker in order to complete your enrollment process.

  • , Wis Adm. Code.

  • Power System Stabilizers The Developer shall procure, install, maintain and operate Power System Stabilizers in accordance with the requirements identified in the Interconnection Studies conducted for Developer’s Large Generating Facility. NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner reserve the right to reasonably establish minimum acceptable settings for any installed Power System Stabilizers, subject to the design and operating limitations of the Large Generating Facility. If the Large Generating Facility’s Power System Stabilizers are removed from service or not capable of automatic operation, the Developer shall immediately notify the Connecting Transmission Owner and NYISO. The requirements of this paragraph shall not apply to wind generators.

  • COVID-19 Vaccine Passports Pursuant to Texas Health and Safety Code, Section 161.0085(c), Contractor certifies that it does not require its customers to provide any documentation certifying the customer’s COVID-19 vaccination or post-transmission recovery on entry to, to gain access to, or to receive service from the Contractor’s business. Contractor acknowledges that such a vaccine or recovery requirement would make Contractor ineligible for a state-funded contract.