Test Matrix Sample Clauses

Test Matrix. Table 3-1 presents the sampling and analytical matrix to be used at the MHF Test. Emissions/Offgas sampling shall be at the * sampling location. Offgas grab samples will be taken and analyzed by an Independent Lab. Sampling/testing will not be initiated until the start-up procedures have been completed and MHFs have stabilized at the desired production rate for the test. Exhibit 10.50(a) to Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2008 filed by ADA-ES, Inc. (File No. 000-50216) on November 7, 2008 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Exhibit 10.50(a) to Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2008 filed by ADA-ES, Inc. (File No. 000-50216) on November 7, 2008
View SourceView Similar (4)
Test Matrix. Table 3-1 presents the sampling and analytical matrix to be used at the MHF Test. Emissions/Offgas sampling shall be at the * sampling location. Offgas grab samples will be taken and analyzed by an ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ Lab. Sampling/testing will not be initiated until the start-up procedures have been completed and MHFs have stabilized at the desired production rate for the test. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
View SourceView Similar (3)
Test Matrix. Table 3-1 presents the sampling and analytical matrix to be used at the MHF Test. Emissions/Offgas sampling shall be at the * sampling location. Offgas grab samples will be taken and analyzed by an Independent Lab. Sampling/testing will not be initiated until the start-up procedures have been completed and MHFs have stabilized at the desired production rate for the test.
View Source
Test Matrix. Tab. 1 gives an overview of the cyclic tests. The cyclic tests may contain a single load block or multiple load blocks. The cyclic tests can be divided into three main types: Constant amplitude tests (denoted by CA in the test ID), two-level block loading tests similar to Fig. 2-1 (denoted by BL in the test ID), and multi-level block loading demonstrator tests (denoted by DEM in the test ID). All cyclic tests are performed in -)control. The applied bending moment will be expressed as a fraction of the Ö fracture toughness of the material system ) =æ
View Source
Test Matrix. A sample of forty-two Ro-Ro vessels is utilised to form a suitable matrix that allows for meaningful comparisons between the various methods of assessing damage survivability as well as between the routes to ensuring compliance with current survivability standards. The main aim of this study is to present a critical evaluation of the emerging trends concerning the level of safety provided by the current damaged survivability standards for Ro-Ro vessels with the focus on the Stockholm Agreement requirements. More specifically, the study addresses the following methods and associated parameters: • SOLAS ’90 [GZmax, Positive GZ Range, Area under GZ Curve] • Stockholm Agreement Calculations [Limiting Hs] • Numerical Simulations [Limiting Hs] • Model Experiments [Limiting Hs] In addition to the above, the residual freeboard and damaged GMT are also considered. The sample of ships considered includes ships ranging in length from 85m to 205m and in damage stability standards from SOLAS ’74 to SOLAS ’90. The relevant details concerning the vessels in question together with the results pertaining to the damage survivability assessment according to the aforementioned methods are presented in Appendix A (available in “More MT Online” on the Web) with the operational sea states given in Table 2. Analysis of these results allowed for illustration of trends, consistency and relative significance between the methods used. A typical sample is shown in Figures 7 to 10.
View Source

Related to Test Matrix

  • Project Specific Milestones In addition to the milestones stated in Section 212.5 of the Tariff, as applicable, during the term of this ISA, Interconnection Customer shall ensure that it meets each of the following development milestones: 6.1 Substantial Site work completed. On or before July 1, 2021, Interconnection Customer must demonstrate completion of at least 20% of project site construction. At this time, Interconnection Customer must submit to Interconnected Transmission Owner and Transmission Provider initial drawings, certified by a professional engineer, of the Customer Interconnection Facilities. 6.2 Delivery of major electrical equipment. On or before July 15, 2021, Interconnection Customer must demonstrate that all generating units have been delivered to Interconnection Customer’s project site.

  • Targets and Milestones For the purposes of this Access Agreement, the University of Bristol will assess progress in widening participation against a combination of progress measures which, between them, are designed to assess: • The specific impact of a number of key outreach initiatives. • Year on year progress in diversifying our applicant and student population. • Year on year progress in improving conversion of under-represented applicants. Bearing in mind the range of outreach activities which we plan to offer, we intend to measure year on year progress in attracting a wider pool of applicants by focusing particularly on each of the following categories (although additional measures included in our 2012 Agreement have also been retained for continuity of monitoring): • Applicants from low performing schools • Applicants from socio-economic groups 4-7 • Local applicants Progress measures for each of these are provided at Appendix Four. In each case, we have included new measures, to assess improvements in application to intake conversion. As far as possible, measures have been calculated taking account of the expected impact of a number of specific outreach initiatives (the Access to Bristol scheme, summer school programme and personal adviser scheme), each of which also has more detailed performance targets associated with them (also detailed at Appendix Four). Measurement of the University’s intake profile will be focused on the low school performance category, reflecting the role which this plays in our contextual approach to admissions. Measures relating to mature student intake have been included for continuity. The recent decision to grow our undergraduate numbers substantially means that continuing to measure progress in diversifying intake by looking at under-represented groups as a percentage of total intake is no longer meaningful. For each intake-related measure, we have therefore added the number of students which the original percentages might have been expected to deliver. Monitoring against these numbers will give a more accurate picture of progress. All progress measures have been informed by more detailed analysis of progress against the institutional milestones detailed in Appendix Two and will be re-calculated annually to reflect assessment of our progress to date. In addition, it should be noted that we intend to carry out further research, for example, to better understand the impact of educational standards in the Bristol area on our ability to progress at the specified rates; we may need to adjust the progress measures contained in this agreement for future years to reflect the findings.

  • Sales Milestones On a Co-Co Product-by-Co-Co Product basis, Celgene shall make the following sales milestone payments to Jounce that are set forth below upon the first achievement by or on behalf of Celgene, its Affiliates or Sublicensees of the Sales Milestone Events set forth below with respect to sales of such Co-Co Product in the ROW Territory. [***] [***] [***] [***]

  • Milestone Schedule Please state the status and progress of each Milestone and identify any completed Milestone(s) for the previous calendar quarter.

  • ATTACHMENT C STANDARD STATE PROVISIONS FOR CONTRACTS AND GRANTS