SUSPECT Clause Samples

SUSPECT. COUNTERFEIT PARTS (FEB 2011) (a) “Suspect/counterfeit parts” are parts that may be of new manufacture, but labeled to represent a different class of parts, or used and/or refurbished parts, complete with false labeling, that are represented as new parts. These parts could include any item where a marking indi- ▇▇▇▇▇ a higher value item. Three of the most common categories of suspect/counterfeit parts are: (1) Hardened fasteners, including bolts and nuts, made of carbon steel or stainless steel.; (2) Piping valves and flanges bearing labels that falsely indicate that the items meet nationally recog- nized consensus standards, such as ASME, ANSI or ASTM; and (3) Used or refurbished molded-case electrical circuit breakers or similar type switch gear. (b) Supplies furnished to Princeton under this Agreement shall not include suspect/counterfeit parts nor shall such parts be used in performing any work under this Agree- ment whether on or off the PPPL site. (c) If suspect/counterfeit parts are furnished under this Agreement and are found on the PPPL site, such parts shall be impounded by Princeton or the Subcontractor shall remove them as directed by Princeton. The Sub- contractor shall promptly replace such parts with supplies acceptable to Princeton, and the Subcontractor shall be liable for all costs relating to impoundment, removal and replacement. (d) The rights of Princeton under this clause are in addi- tion to any other rights provided by law or under this Agreement.
SUSPECT. COUNTERFEIT PARTS - Seller represents and warrants that it has policies and procedures in place to ensure that none of the supplies or materials furnished under any Purchase Order are “suspect/counterfeit parts” and certifies, to the best of its knowledge and belief, that no such parts have been or are being furnished to Buyer by Seller. “Suspect/counterfeit parts” are (i) parts that may be of new manufacture, but are misleadingly labeled to provide the impression they are of a different class or quality or from a different source than is actually the case; (ii) refurbished parts, complete with false labeling, that are represented as new parts; or (iii) any parts that are designated as suspect by the U.S. Government, such as parts listed in Safety Alerts for Human Medical Products published by the Food and Drug Administration. If Buyer reasonably determines that Seller has supplied suspect/counterfeit parts to Buyer, Buyer shall promptly notify Seller and Seller shall immediately replace the suspect/counterfeit parts with parts acceptable to Buyer. Notwithstanding any other warranty, liability limitation, indemnification or other provision contained herein (including the limitations of liability set forth in Section 12), Seller shall be liable for all costs incurred by Buyer to remove and replace the suspect/counterfeit parts, including without limitation Buyer’s external and internal costs of removing such suspect/counterfeit parts, of sourcing, purchasing and reinserting replacement parts and of any testing necessitated by the reinstallation of Seller’s goods after suspect/counterfeit parts have been exchanged. In addition, Buyer may unilaterally terminate any or all Purchase Orders depending on the impact of the delivery of suspect/counterfeit parts on Seller’s overall performance on the Purchase Order under which the suspect/counterfeit parts were delivered. Seller’s warranty against suspect/counterfeit parts shall survive any termination or expiration of any Purchase Order relating to such suspect/counterfeit parts.

Related to SUSPECT

  • No Harassment Contractor does not engage in unlawful harassment, including sexual harassment, with respect to any persons with whom Contractor may interact in the performance of this Agreement, and Contractor takes all reasonable steps to prevent harassment from occurring.

  • Unknown Claims Executive acknowledges that Executive has been advised to consult with legal counsel and that Executive is familiar with the principle that a general release does not extend to claims that the releaser does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, which, if known by him or her, must have materially affected his or her settlement with the releasee. Executive, being aware of this principle, agrees to expressly waive any rights Executive may have to that effect, as well as under any other statute or common law principles of similar effect.]3

  • DISCIPLINE AND DISMISSAL 27.01 The Employer may discipline, suspend or dismiss an employee for just cause only, except for the dismissal of a probationary Employee. Unsatisfactory conduct or performance by an Employee which is considered by the Employer to be serious enough to be entered on the Employee's record but not serious enough to warrant suspension or dismissal shall result in a written warning to the Employee and a copy to the Union within fifteen (15) days of the date the Employer first became aware of, or reasonably should have become aware of the occurrence of the act. The Union shall not deny a request by the Employer to extend the timelines due to availability of persons identified by the Employer to be interviewed. A written warning that is grieved and determined to be unjustified shall be removed from the Employee's record. 27.02 In the event an Employee is suspended or dismissed, the Employer shall provide written reasons for the suspension or dismissal to the Employee and the Union forthwith and in any event not later than five (5) days of the action being taken. The action or suspension or dismissal shall be within fifteen (15) days of the date the Employer first became aware of, or reasonably should have become aware of the occurrence of the act, giving rise to the suspension or dismissal. The Union shall not deny a request by the Employer to extend the timelines due to unavailability of persons identified by the Employer to be interviewed. When action involves a suspension, the notice shall specify the time period of the suspension. 27.03 An Employee who has been subject to disciplinary action may after two (2) years of continuous service from the date the disciplinary measure was invoked, request in writing that their personnel file be cleared of any record of the disciplinary action. Such request shall be granted provided the Employee's file does not contain any further record of disciplinary action during the two (2) year period of which the Employee is aware. The Employer shall confirm in writing to the Employee that such action has been effected. 27.04 The procedures stated in Articles 27.01, 27.02 and 27.03 do not prevent immediate suspension or dismissal for just cause. (a) An Employee required by the Employer to attend an investigation meeting or a disciplinary discussion shall be paid at the applicable rate of pay for time spent in that meeting. (b) Where circumstances permit, the Employer shall schedule a disciplinary discussion with the Employee by giving reasonable advance notice which shall not be less than twenty-four (24) hours. At such discussion an Employee may be accompanied by a representative of the Union. 27.06 In the event that an Employee is reported to their licensing body by the Employer, the Employee shall be so advised, and unless otherwise requested a written copy shall be forwarded to the Union forthwith. In the event, an Employee is reported to their licensing body, by someone other than the Employer, the Employee shall advise the Employer of such and the Employee may copy the Union on such notification. 27.07 An Employee absent for three (3) consecutive work days without good and proper reason and without notifying the Employer shall be considered to have terminated their Employment with the Employer. 27.08 For the purposes of this Article, periods of time referred to in days shall be deemed to mean consecutive calendar days exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and Named Holidays, which are specified in Article 19.

  • Appearance as a Witness Notwithstanding any other provision of this Article V, the Company may pay or reimburse expenses incurred by a Covered Person in connection with his or her appearance as a witness or other participation in a Proceeding at a time when such Covered Person is not a named defendant or respondent in the Proceeding.

  • Reasonable Suspicion a. Reasonable suspicion to test a Covered Employees for illegal drugs or alcohol will exist when specific, reliable objective facts and circumstances would create a good faith belief in a prudent person that the employee has used a drug or alcohol. Such circumstances include, but are not limited to, the employee’s behavior or appearance while on any SFMTA jobsite, while on SFMTA business or in SFMTA facilities, and recognized and accepted symptoms of intoxication or impairment caused by drugs or alcohol, that are not reasonably explained by other causes such as fatigue, lack of sleep, proper use of prescription drugs, or reaction to noxious fumes or smoke. b. Any individual or employee can report an employee who may be under the influence of alcohol or drugs. Upon receiving a report of possible alcohol or illegal drugs on the job, two (2) trained employer representatives will verify and document the basis for the suspicion and request testing. The first employer representative shall verify and document the employee’s appearance and behavior based on the above-stated indicators and, if appropriate, recommend testing to the second employer representative. At work locations within the border of the City and County of San Francisco (including San Francisco International Airport), the second employer representative shall verify and document the appearance and behavior of the employee based on the above-stated indicators and has final authority to require the employee to be tested. At work locations outside the border of the City and County of San Francisco, the second employer representative shall confer with the first employer representative to verify the employee’s behavior based on the above- stated indicators, and the second employer representative has the final authority to require the employee to be tested. In the event only one trained employer representative is available onsite, the representative shall confer with any other trained employer representative within the City to verify the employee’s behavior. The second trained employer representative shall have the final authority to require the employee to be tested. c. If the SFMTA requires an employee to be tested under reasonable suspicion, then the employee may ask for representation. Representation may include, but is not limited to, union representatives and shop stewards. If the employee requests representation, the SFMTA may allow a reasonable amount (a maximum of one hour) of time for the employee to obtain representation. Such request shall not delay the administration of the tests for more than one hour from the time the employee is notified that the employee will be tested. d. Moreover, if the SFMTA has reasonable suspicion or suspect that a prescription medication may have interfered with or may have had a direct impact on an employee’s job performance, it may require that employee to be tested. e. The department representative(s) shall be required to accurately document and file the incident and the employee shall be required to complete a consent form prior to any testing. If an employee refuses to Submit to testing, then the SFMTA shall treat the refusal as having tested positive and shall immediately take appropriate disciplinary action pursuant to the attached discipline matrix. f. The SFMTA shall bear the costs for any required testing for alcohol and/or drugs under this section. Any counseling and rehabilitation services shall be on the employee’s time and at the employee’s cost, except that employees may use accrued paid time off to attend treatment and may utilize any resources covered by insurance. Employees shall have the right to use any accrued but unused leave balances while enrolled in any counseling or rehabilitation program. Any request by an employee to re-test a specimen shall be at the employee’s cost.