Security Model and Safe Predicate Sample Clauses

Security Model and Safe Predicate. To analyze the modified protocol, we essentially use the security model from [KPPW+21], which allows the adversary to act partially active and fully adaptive. The only differences in the setting of baCGKA are that 1) users are processing concurrent messages, and 2) no messages will ever be rejected. Regarding 2) it is however possible that messages get lost and hence, even if a user generated an update it might not process this update.
Security Model and Safe Predicate. To analyze the security of CoCoA, we essentially use the security model from [23], which allows the adversary to act partially actively and fully adaptively: in this model, the adversary can adaptively decide which users perform which operations, and can actively control the delivery server; however it can not issue messages on behalf of the users. In [23] this is enforced by assuming authenticated channels. Since in CoCoA the signing of protocol messages is more involved, parent hash plays an important role also for security against partially active adversaries, and the server no longer just relays messages, we make the use of signatures explicit in this work. As we restrict our analysis to partially active adversaries, the adversary does not get access to signing keys via corruptions. While this might look artificial, it has importance in practice as discussed in the introduction, and we still obtain meaningful results in the vein of [23]. Nevertheless, we consider the analysis of CoCoA’s security against fully active adversaries an important question for future work. Except for explicit signatures, the differences in the setting of concurrent CGKA to the one of [23] are that 1) users process concurrent messages, 2) no messages are ever rejected by the server, and 3) the server is allowed to send arbitrary (potentially malformed) messages. Regarding 2), it is however possible that messages get lost and even that a user does not process an update they generated. Whether a user IDi’s update message (and which one) is contained in a round message Mi, is represented by a counter ci. Finally, regarding 3), while our security notion is strictly stronger than the one from [23] (where the server could only forward existing messages), the security of protocols such as TreeKEM and TTKEM can trivially be upgraded to our notion: This is true since round messages in these protocols only consist of signed messages and the adversary does not learn any party’s signing key. In our protocols, in contrast, the server is assumed to perform some computation on users’ messages, hence it makes sense to consider a stronger model where this computation is not trusted.

Related to Security Model and Safe Predicate

  • Security Safeguards Contractor shall store and process District Data in accordance with commercial best practices, including implementing appropriate administrative, physical, and technical safeguards that are no less rigorous than those outlined in SANS Top 20 Security Controls, as amended, to secure such data from unauthorized access, disclosure, alteration, and use. Contractor shall ensure that all such safeguards, including the manner in which District Data is collected, accessed, used, stored, processed, disposed of and disclosed, comply with all applicable federal and state data protection and privacy laws, regulations and directives, including without limitation C.R.S. § ▇▇-▇▇-▇▇▇ et seq., as well as the terms and conditions of this Addendum. Without limiting the foregoing, and unless expressly agreed to the contrary in writing, Contractor warrants that all electronic District Data will be encrypted in transmission and at rest in accordance with NIST Special Publication 800-57, as amended.

  • HIV/AIDS Model Workplace Guidelines Grantee will: a. implement the System Agency’s policies based on the Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS), AIDS Model Workplace Guidelines for Businesses at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇.▇▇/hivstd/policy/policies.shtm, State Agencies and State Grantees Policy No. 090.021. b. educate employees and clients concerning HIV and its related conditions, including AIDS, in accordance with the Texas. Health & Safety Code §§ 85.112-114.

  • Cleanliness and Safety; Entry Resident agrees to maintain the assigned bedroom space, the apartment and the common areas of the Property in a clean, safe and sanitary condition, to exercise all due care in the use of same, and to cooperate fully with the Property pest control program as requested. Resident will be responsible for the cost of treatment for bedbugs and similar pests to the extent Owner’s pest control vendor reasonably determines that an infestation has originated within Resident’s assigned space and during Resident’s occupancy. Resident will place all trash in provided receptacles and will be responsible for the cost of cleaning the interior or exterior of the apartment if not kept in sanitary condition. When outdoor temperatures are below 40 degrees Fahrenheit, Resident will keep the apartment’s heat turned on to prevent frozen or burst pipes, including during vacations. When outdoor temperatures exceed 85 degrees Fahrenheit, Resident will keep the apartment’s air conditioning turned on and set to a reasonable temperature to prevent mold or mildew growth, including during vacations. Owner and its agents, employees and contractors may enter any apartment and bedroom space to perform routine maintenance, inspections, showings and other ordinary functions, provided that Owner will provide advance notice to residents of an apartment before such entry. Owner reserves the right to enter an apartment and any bedroom space without prior notice (including a passkey and/or disarming the alarm or other means of entry if locks have been changed) for emergency maintenance or repair purposes, or when there is reasonable cause to believe that a situation exists that could cause danger to life, safety, health or property. Owner may confiscate any item deemed to cause a danger and is under no obligation to pay compensation for or to return such items.

  • CONTRACT WORK HOURS AND SAFETY STANDARDS As per the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (40 U.S.C. 3701-3708), where applicable, all Customer Purchase Orders in excess of ,000 that involve the employment of mechanics or laborers must include a provision for compliance with 40 U.S.C. 3702 and 3704, as supplemented by Department of Labor regulations (29 CFR Part 5). Under 40 U.S.C. 3702 of the Act, each contractor must be required to compute the wages of every mechanic and laborer on the basis of a standard work week of 40 hours. Work in excess of the standard work week is permissible provided that the worker is compensated at a rate of not less than one and a half times the basic rate of pay for all hours worked in excess of 40 hours in the work week. The requirements of 40 U.S.C. 3704 are applicable to construction work and provide that no laborer or mechanic must be required to work in surroundings or under working conditions which are unsanitary, hazardous or dangerous. These requirements do not apply to the purchases of supplies or materials or articles ordinarily available on the open market, or contracts for transportation or transmission of intelligence.

  • Security and Safety A. The Contractor warrants it is and shall remain in compliance with all applicable local, state and federal laws, regulations, codes and ordinances relating to fire, construction, building, health, food service and safety, including but not limited to the Hotel and Motel Fire Safety Act of 1990, Public Law 101-391. The Judicial Council may terminate this Agreement, pursuant to the termination for cause provision set forth herein, without penalty or prejudice if the Contractor fails to comply with the foregoing requirements. B. The Contractor shall assure that each Attendee is advised of all the appropriate precautions that should be taken to provide for the Attendee’s safety while on the Property. The Contractor shall take every reasonable precaution to provide for the security of Attendees and their belongings. C. The Contractor shall immediately advise the Judicial Council’s staff of any known problems that involve the Attendees during the Program including, but not limited to, assaults, burglaries, accidents, and/or illnesses.