Scenario selection Sample Clauses

Scenario selection. As a result of the ranking of the scenarios we have selected a subset of them that will be further investigated for implementation. This selection takes into account the total scores of the scenarios in terms of their characteristics combined with the total number of votes from the partners. The subset of the scenarios, are as follows: UC11 – Energy efficiency contest Federated testbeds link UC2 – Public reporting and participatory sensing Core app (crowdsensing and crowdsourcing by events)+questionnaires UC12 - Energy Efficiency and user comfort in HOBNET enabled environments, using mobile crowdsensing hints Comfort hints UC13 - HEPIA sustainable week - crowdsourcing Event organisation for new ideas UC1 – eCROWD Core platform UC5 – Business and market studies Business angle For the above listed scenarios we can identify synergies between some of the them, leading us to further investigate the possiblity of merging similar scenarios. On the other hand, the degree of complexity of a scenario should be kept in a comprehensive level, meaning that each scenario should include a representativenumber of functionalities. All these considerations led us to identify two different scenarios for implementation: one scenario focused on the physical testbeds interaction and the other one focused on smart city. For the testbed related use case we will consider UC11, UC12, UC13 and UC5, whereas for the smart city scenario we will consider the scenarios UC1, UC2 and UC5. For the business and market studies use case we decided to extend the scenario’s description in order for it to be transversal to both use cases. The description is the following: IoT Lab technology is uniquely placed to measure the relationship between environmental conditions and consumer decisions. Academic research by psychologists and behavioural economists clearly shows that humans are not as objective or clinical in their decision making as many people might like to think and that environmental conditions can strongly bias the decisions that people make. Nobel prize (in Economics, 2002) winning research by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ showed that prior exposure of an audience to a high or a low number had a measurable influence on how that audience subsequently estimated a variable that most of them would not know the answer to (e.g. an American audience was asked what percentage of African countries are members of the UN). This bias has been shown to extend to people’s estimation of the value of an object...
View Source

Related to Scenario selection

  • Panel Selection 1. The Parties shall apply the following procedures in selecting a Panel: (a) the Panel shall comprise 3 members; (b) within 15 days following the date of the establishment of the Panel, each Party shall nominate a Panelist; (c) the Parties shall endeavor 2. If a Panelist appointed under this Article resigns or becomes unable to act, a successor Panelist shall be appointed within 30 days in accordance with the selection procedure as prescribed for the appointment of the original Panelist and the successor shall have all the powers and duties of the original Panelist. The work of the Panel shall be suspended during the appointment of the successor Panelist.

  • Site Selection 5.1.1 If the parties have not designated the street address of the Franchised Location on Exhibit A on the Effective Date, Franchisee shall identify, submit and obtain Franchisor’s prior written approval of the Franchised Location meeting the requirements of this Agreement prior to entering a lease or sublease for the Franchised Location. Franchisee shall provide Franchisor all information required by Franchisor, as determined by Franchisor in Franchisor’s sole determination, necessary for Franchisor to evaluate the Franchised Location. Franchisor shall have ten (10) business days to review Franchisee’s written site proposal for the Franchised Location and notify Franchisee of its approval or disapproval in writing. Franchisor’s failure to respond within ten (10) business days shall signify Franchisor’s disapproval of the site. Franchisor shall not unreasonably withhold Franchisor’s approval of a proposed site for the Franchised Location. 5.1.2 Franchisee must have a site for the Franchised Location approved by Franchisor, receive the opening notice from Franchisor described in Section 5.4 below, and open Franchisee’s Franchised Business for business within six (6) months from the Effective Date, except as otherwise provided in Section 5.1.3 All matters related in any way to Franchisee’s site are Franchisee’s sole responsibility, regardless of any assistance Franchisor may choose to provide. Franchisee is responsible for obtaining any architectural and engineering services required for Franchisee’s facility and for ensuring its compliance with local law. Neither Franchisor, nor any other person or company associated with Franchisor shall have any liability for any site‐related matter. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ agrees not to make any claims against Franchisor and/or any of Franchisor’s affiliates or associates with regard to such matters. 5.1.4 If Franchisor makes a loan to Franchisee for (i) Franchisee’s purchase of the franchise for the Franchised Business; (ii) the remodeling of the Franchised Location; (iii) the transfer of any interest in this franchise or this Agreement; or (iv) any other purpose; Franchisee shall open (or re‐open, as the case may be), the Franchised Business for business within sixty (60) days from the loan origination date.

  • Shift Selection Employee assignments within the Patrol Bureau will occur between approximately April 1-15 and shall be awarded based upon seniority. Approximately three (3) months before then the Department will publish a call for written requests on shift assignment. Employees will make their first three (3) choices known. Employees will learn of the assignment, including days off associated with their assignment, immediately after the bidding process is completed. Assignments will take effect on the schedule immediately following July 1st. Residence Hall assignments will be made prior to all others. No officer will be required to work a Residence Hall assignment in consecutive years. Assignment of the remaining officers will begin with selection(s) for day and night shifts. The bid for assignments will continue until all positions are filled. The following general rules apply to assignments: 1. During the term of this Agreement, no employee will be reassigned to a different shift other than the shift awarded by seniority except in situations where the University cannot continue to provide police services. In the event a shift reassignment must occur, it will be offered to volunteers based on seniority. If there are no volunteers it will be assigned to the least senior officer in the department. 2. Shift selection shall be an appropriate subject for the Joint Labor/Management Committee. 3. If a shift becomes available as a result of trainees being released for duty, and if there is at least four (4) months until the next shift change, the shift will be posted and awarded by seniority. The new trainee released for duty will take the senior officers shift. If no employee desires the shift, the trainee scheduled for assignment will be assigned that shift. The parties recognize that for the betterment of the Department it may be necessary to assign a trainee to a specific shift. 4. Voluntary shift trades will be allowed as long as overtime costs are not incurred. 5. Except in a bona fide emergency, no employee shall be assigned to work more than sixteen (16) hours in a twenty-four (24) hour period, provided however employees may volunteer to work up to eighteen (18) hours in a twenty-four (24) hour period.

  • Single Source Selection Services for tasks in circumstances which meet the requirements of paragraph 3.10 of the Consultant Guidelines for Single Source Selection, may, with the Association's prior agreement, be procured in accordance with the provisions of paragraphs 3.9 through 3.13 of the Consultant Guidelines.

  • Adverse Selection No selection procedures adverse to the Noteholders were utilized in selecting the Receivables from those receivables owned by the Seller which met the selection criteria set forth in this Agreement.