Protest Process Clause Samples
The Protest Process clause outlines the procedures and requirements for formally objecting to a decision or action, typically within the context of procurement, bidding, or contract award processes. It specifies the steps a party must take to submit a protest, such as deadlines for filing, required documentation, and the authority to whom the protest must be addressed. By establishing a clear and orderly method for raising and resolving disputes, this clause ensures fairness and transparency, helping to prevent misunderstandings and protect the rights of all parties involved.
Protest Process. A Respondent may protest the procurement process or the ITB document as set forth in ORS 279B.405(2). Proposer written comments shall include
a. A detailed statement of the legal and factual grounds for the protest;
b. A description of the resulting prejudice to the Respondent; and
c. A statement of the form of relief requested or any proposed changes to the contract terms and conditions or specifications.
d. OETC will issue a Written Disposition of the Protest in a timely manner. OETC's Executive Director has the authority to settle any protest. If the Executive Director does not settle a Protest, the OETC Board President, or designee, has the authority to resolve the Protest. If OETC upholds the Protest, in whole or in part, OETC will, in its sole discretion, either award the Contract to the successful protester or cancel the RFP.
Protest Process. Offerors are directed to Utah Code Part 16 and Utah Administrative Code Rule R16 available at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/xcode/Title63G/Chapter6a/63G-6a-S1601.html and ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/publicat/code/r033/r033-016.htm for available protest processes.
Protest Process. Any Proposer wishing to file a protest as to the requirements or award of this RFQ must do so in accordance with Ordinance 17-203 (Procurement Ordinance), which is available at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇-▇▇.▇▇▇/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=67&Itemid=269.
Protest Process. 1.13.1 Under Board Policy No. 5.055 (Services Contract Solicitation Protest), any prospective Bidder may request a review of the requirements under a solicitation for a Board-approved services contract, as described in Section 1.13.3 below. Additionally, any actual Bidder may request a review of a disqualification or of a proposed contract award under such solicitation as described respectively in the Sections below. It is the responsibility of the Bidder challenging the decision of a County department to demonstrate that the department committed a sufficiently material error in the solicitation process to justify invalidation of a proposed Work Order award.
1.13.2 Throughout the review process, the County has no obligation to delay or otherwise postpone a Work Order award based on a Bidder protest. In all cases, the County reserves the right to make an award when it is determined to be in the best interest of the County of Los Angeles to do so.
Protest Process. Any Proposer wishing to file a protest as to the requirements or award of this RFP must do so in accordance with Ordinance 12-142 (Procurement Ordinance), which is available at ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇- ▇▇.▇▇▇/▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇?▇▇▇▇▇▇=▇▇▇_▇▇▇▇▇▇▇&▇▇▇▇=▇▇▇▇▇▇▇&▇▇=▇▇&▇▇▇▇▇▇=▇▇▇. Agreed
Protest Process. 9.2.1 If the requesting Proposer is not satisfied with the Debriefing, a Protest may be submitted to the email address above within three
9.2.2 Only Protests submitted from Debriefed Proposers shall be considered. The Department will only consider Protests satisfying the criteria set forth below and received via email by the deadline set forth above. Any Protest received after such deadline will be denied. Timely protests must assert, in appropriate detail with factual reasons, one or more of the following grounds for review:
9.2.2.1 JCOD materially failed to follow procedures specified in its WOS.
9.2.2.2 JCOD made identifiable mathematical or other errors in evaluating proposals, resulting in the Proposer receiving an incorrect score and not being selected as the recommended contractor.
9.2.2.3 A member of the Evaluation Review Committee demonstrated bias in the conduct of the review.
9.2.2.4 Another basis for review as provided by State or federal law.
9.2.3 Proposers will be notified by JCOD of the decision on any Protest received by JCOD in a timely manner. ▇▇▇▇’s decision will be final and will explain the basis for the decision.
9.2.4 Throughout the Protest process, JCOD shall have no obligation to delay or otherwise postpone the award of any Work Order because of any Proposer’s Protest. In all cases, the Department reserves the right to move forward with awarding a Work Order when it is determined to be in the best interest of the County.