Test Procedures. For an Asset Review, the Asset Representations Reviewer will perform for each Asset Review Receivable the procedures listed under “Procedures to be Performed” in Schedule A for each representation and warranty (each, a “Test”), using the Asset Review Materials listed for each such Test in Schedule A. For each Test and Asset Review Receivable, the Asset Representations Reviewer will determine if the Test has been satisfied (a “Test Pass”) or if the Test has not been satisfied (a “Test Fail”).
Test Procedures. For an Asset Review, the Asset Representations Reviewer will perform for each Subject Receivable the procedures listed under “Tests” in Schedule A for each representation and warranty (each, a “Test”), using the Review Materials listed for each such Test in Schedule A. For each Test and Subject Receivable, the Asset Representations Reviewer will determine in its reasonable judgment if the Test has been satisfied (a “Test Pass”), or if the Test has not been satisfied (a “Test Fail”), or if the Test could not be concluded as a result of missing or incomplete Review Materials (a “Test Incomplete”). The Asset Representations Reviewer will use such determination for all Subject Receivables that are subject to the same Test.
Test Procedures. For a Review, the Asset Representations Reviewer will perform for each Review Receivable the procedures listed under “Tests” in Schedule B for each representation and warranty (each, a “Test”), using the Review Materials necessary to perform the procedures as stated in the Test. For each Test and Review Receivable, the Asset Representations Reviewer will determine if the Test has been satisfied (a “Test Pass”) or if the Test has not been satisfied (a “Test Fail”). If a Test or part of a Test cannot be performed for a Review Receivable because the Test circumstances do not apply to the Review Receivable, the Test will be considered to be satisfied and will be reported as a Test Pass.
Test Procedures. For an Asset Representations Review, the Asset Representations Reviewer will perform, for each Review Receivable, the Tests for each Eligible Representation. In the course of its review, the Asset Representations Reviewer will use the Review Materials listed in Schedule A as specified in the description of each Test under Schedule B. For each Test and Review Receivable, the Asset Representations Reviewer will determine if the Test has been satisfied (a “Test Pass”) or if the Test has not been satisfied (a “Test Fail”). During the course of its review, the Asset Representations Reviewer will provide the Issuer and the Servicer with a preliminary list of any Test Fail and the issues identified and, at that time, the Servicer has the option of electing to provide additional Review Materials or information which the Asset Representations Reviewer will analyze and consider in preparing the Review Report.
Test Procedures. For an Asset Representations Review, the Asset Representations Reviewer will perform, for each Review Receivable, the Tests for each Eligible Representation. In the course of its review, the Asset Representations Reviewer will use the Review Materials listed in Schedule A as specified in the description of each Test under Schedule B. For each Test and Review Receivable, the Asset Representations Reviewer will determine if the Test has been satisfied (a “Test Pass”) or if the Test has not been satisfied (a “Test Fail”). During the course of its review, the Asset Representations Reviewer will provide the Issuing Entity, the Grantor Trust and the Servicer and the Sponsor with a preliminary list of any Test Fail and the issues identified and, at that time, the Sponsor has the option of electing to provide additional Review Materials or information which the Asset Representations Reviewer will analyze and consider in preparing the Review Report.
Test Procedures. The second most critical requirement for the prime and subContractors is development of the comprehensive test procedures for equipment and systems based on the operating criteria, test parameters, and acceptable results required. Many Contractors have not had experience in this area. That is why the preference is to require a test engineer—someone who specializes (or has had experience) in development of test procedures. As the University gains commissioning experience, it will develop a library of test procedures for the range of equipment and systems it has commissioned. To a degree, there is a somewhat generic quality regarding test procedures for common equipment and systems. However, in every instance, such procedures must be carefully reviewed and adapted to the unique characteristics and design conditions of the project and its equipment. The University will make all of this material available to consultants and Contractors for reference during design and construction. Doing so will help to reduce the time required for such development for the specific project, develop more consistent testing/commissioning among projects, and gradually improve the quality of the testing/commissioning program. Commissioning is a detail and discipline intensive program. On the surface, it would appear to generate extra cost for the project. However, feedback from successful (properly developed during design and construction) commissioning projects indicates that rigorous scheduling of construction activities, testing and correcting deficiencies during the course of construction, and maintaining a tight, thoroughly committed, integrated construction/commissioning schedule will not increase costs, and quite likely may decrease costs (for those Contractors who take the program seriously and manage their projects accordingly) Date:______________________ Additional Services Proposal No.___________ Name of A/E firm: Re: (project name, number campus) Refer to the Agreement dated __________________, 20__ between _____________________________ (“Owner”) and the undersigned (“Project Architect”) as amended to the date hereof (such agreement as so modified and amended being hereafter called the “Agreement”) pursuant to which Project Architect is to perform certain services. The terms which are defined in the Agreement shall have the same meanings when used in this letter. The fee for these requested additional services are in lieu of any other fee adjustment based on an increas...
Test Procedures. Testing methodology will comply with the requirements of the Oklahoma Act, except that the requirements of the Federal Act stated in Test Procedures supersede the provisions of the Oklahoma Act.
Test Procedures. The methods of testing and measuring instruments shall be those described in Annex 4 to this Regulation.
Test Procedures. Animal selec- tion—(i) Species. The rat shall be used because it has been used extensively for metabolic and toxicological studies.
Test Procedures. For an Asset Review, the Asset Representations Reviewer will perform, for each Subject Lease, the procedures listed under “Procedures to be Performed” in Schedule A attached hereto for each representation and warranty being tested (each, a “Test”) using the Review Materials listed in Schedule A for each such Test For each Test and Subject Lease, the Asset Representations Reviewer will determine in its reasonable judgment (i) if the Test has been satisfied (a “Test Pass”), (ii) if the Test has not been satisfied (a “Test Fail”) or (iii) if the Test could not be conducted as a result of missing or incomplete Review Materials (a “Test Incomplete”). The Asset Representations Reviewer will use such determination for all Subject Receivables that are subject to the same Test.