Evaluation and Award. 7.1 The Owners will award contract/s to Vendors who have:
Evaluation and Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements, and is determined via a trade-off analysis to be the best value based on application of the following evaluation criteria. The relative importance of each individual criterion is indicated by the number of points below: • Technical – 30 points: Responsiveness to the technical specifications and requirements. • Delivery – 10 points: The speed of delivery. • After-Sales Service – 20 points: The ability for the offeror to provide after-sales services, including warranty and routine maintenance, particularly in the areas outside of the capital city. Service center(s) will be evaluated on ability to be equipped with tools, staffed with technical personnel, and stocked with spare parts for after-sales service. • Price – 40 points: The overall cost presented in the offer. Please note that if there are significant deficiencies regarding responsiveness to the requirements of this RFQ, an offer may be deemed “non-responsive” and thereby disqualified from consideration. Chemonics reserves the right to waive immaterial deficiencies at its discretion. Best-offer quotations are requested. It is anticipated that award will be made solely on the basis of these original quotations. However, Chemonics reserves the right to conduct any of the following: • Chemonics may conduct negotiations with and/or request clarifications from any offeror prior to award. • While preference will be given to offerors who can address the full technical requirements of this RFQ, Chemonics may issue a partial award or split the award among various suppliers, if in the best interest of the USAID’s Tourism For All Project. • Chemonics may cancel this RFQ at any time. Please note that in submitting a response to this RFQ, the offeror understands that USAID is not a party to this solicitation and the offeror agrees that any protest hereunder must be presented—in writing with full explanations—to the USAID’s Tourism For All Project for consideration, as USAID will not consider protests regarding procurements carried out by implementing partners. Chemonics, at its sole discretion, will make a final decision on the protest for this procurement.
Evaluation and Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements, trade-off approach; evaluation criteria must be edited as needed; this option is the recommended default): and is determined via a trade-off analysis to be the best value based on application of the following evaluation criteria. Evaluation points will not be awarded for cost, but for overall evaluation purposes of this RFQ, technical evaluation factors other than cost, when combined, are considered significantly more important than. Cost will primarily be evaluated for realism and reasonableness. If technical scores are determined to be nearly equal, cost will become the determining factor. The relative importance of each individual criterion is indicated by the number of points below:
Evaluation and Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements, and meets or exceeds the minimum required technical specifications, and is judged to be the best value based on a lowest-price, technically-acceptable basis. Please note that if there are significant deficiencies regarding responsiveness to the requirements of this RFQ, an offer may be deemed “non-responsive” and thereby disqualified from consideration. Chemonics reserves the right to waive immaterial deficiencies at its discretion. Best-offer quotations are requested. It is anticipated that award will be made solely on the basis of these original quotations. However, Chemonics reserves the right to conduct any of the following: • Chemonics may conduct negotiations with and/or request clarifications from any offeror prior to award. • While preference will be given to offerors who can address the full technical requirements of this RFQ, Chemonics may issue a partial award or split the award among various suppliers, if in the best interest of the FAIDA Project. • Chemonics may cancel this RFQ at any time. Please note that in submitting a response to this RFQ, the offeror understands that USAID is not a party to this solicitation and the offeror agrees that any protest hereunder must be presented—in writing with full explanations—to the FAIDA Project for consideration, as USAID will not consider protests regarding procurements carried out by implementing partners. Chemonics, at its sole discretion, will make a final decision on the protest for this procurement.
Evaluation and Award. Evaluation and Award All items included in this solicitation will be awarded to multiple Vendors. The State will be the sole judge in determining the acceptability of an offer and in determining compliance with bid specifications and comparing prices. Award shall be made with reasonable promptness, to the low responsive and responsible Vendors whose bid meets the requirements and criteria set forth in this Invitation for Bid. This solicitation will be evaluated as follows: the receipt of complete IFB Signature Page and Requirements will be evaluated first. All Vendor(s) who meet these requirements will then be considered for pricing review. Vendor(s) who do not meet these requirements will be deemed non-responsive and/or non-responsible and will not be considered further. Award will then be made to the lowest responsive and responsible Vendor. Reciprocity is mandated by statute. CRS §8-18-101 states, “When a contract for commodities or services is to be awarded to a bidder, a resident bidder…shall be allowed a preference against a nonresident bidder equal to the preference given or required by the state in which the nonresident bidder is a resident.” OIT will apply this statute for all solicitations. OIT reserves the right to reject all bids and re-solicit at any time prior to award of the IFB. OIT reserves the right to cancel this bid in its entirety at any time without penalty. All prices and notations shall be printed in ink or type written on the bid documents. Illegible bids or writing shall be deemed non-responsive and will not be evaluated. A bid with missing or inconsistent information may be considered non-responsive and may not be evaluated. Do not qualify your bid nor alter the bid format. OIT will be the sole judge in determining the acceptability of an offer. OIT also reserves the right to reject any or all bids in part or in whole and to waive technicalities as allowed in the Procurement Code and Rules.
Evaluation and Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements and is determined via a trade-off analysis to be the best value based on application of the following evaluation criteria. The relative importance of each individual criterion is indicated by the number of points below: • Cost – 50 points: The overall cost presented in the offer for services; • Corporate Capabilities and quality- 30 points: Chemonics will evaluate whether is the company experience relevant to the services requested and quality of services offered. • Performance-20 points: Offerors must include a minimum of 3 past performance references of similar work (under contracts or subcontracts) previously implemented as well as contact information for the companies for which such work was completed. Please note that if there are significant deficiencies regarding responsiveness to the requirements of this RFQ, an offer may be deemed “non-responsive” and thereby disqualified from consideration. Chemonics reserves the right to waive immaterial deficiencies at its discretion. Best-offer quotations are requested. It is anticipated that award will be made solely on the basis of these original quotations. However, Chemonics reserves the right to conduct any of the following: • Chemonics may conduct negotiations with and/or request clarifications from any offeror prior to award. • While preference will be given to offerors who can address the full technical requirements of this RFQ, Chemonics may issue a partial award or split the award among various Vendors, if in the best interest of the Kosovo e- Governance Activity. • Chemonics may cancel this RFQ at any time. • Chemonics may reject any and all offers, if such action is considered to be in the best interest of Chemonics.
Evaluation and Award. In accordance with the New York City Charter, the Procurement Policy Board Rules and the terms and conditions contained herein, this contract shall be awarded, if at all, to the responsible bidder whose bid meets the requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in the Invitation for Bids, and whose bid price is either the most favorable bid price or, if the Invitation For Bids so states, the most favorable evaluated bid price or award to other than the lowest responsible bidder pursuant to Section 3-02(o) of the PPB Rules. A bid may not be evaluated for any requirement or criterion that is not disclosed in the Invitation For Bids.
Evaluation and Award. 1. The District will award the proposal that offers the overall best value to the District.
Evaluation and Award. The award will be made to a responsible offeror whose offer follows the RFQ instructions, meets the eligibility requirements, or exceeds the minimum required technical specifications, and is judged to be the best value based on a lowest-price, technically acceptable basis. Please note that if there are significant deficiencies regarding responsiveness to the requirements of this RFQ, an offer may be deemed “non-responsive” and thereby disqualified from consideration. Chemonics reserves the right to waive immaterial deficiencies at its discretion. Best-offer quotations are requested. It is anticipated that award will be made solely on the basis of these original quotations. However, Chemonics reserves the right to conduct any of the following: Chemonics may conduct negotiations with and/or request clarifications from any offeror prior to award. While preference will be given to offerors who can address the full technical requirements of this RFQ, Chemonics may issue a partial award or split the award among various Vendors, if in the best interest of the Kosovo Economic Governance Activity. Chemonics may cancel this RFQ at any time. Chemonics may reject any and all offers, if such action is considered to be in the best interest of Chemonics.
Evaluation and Award. 10.01 This contract shall be awarded, if at all, to the responsible bidder whose bid meets the requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in the Invitation for Bids, and whose bid price is either the lowest responsive and responsible bid price or, if the Invitation for Bids so states, the lowest responsive and responsible evaluated bid price. A bid may not be evaluated for any requirement or criterion that is not disclosed in the Invitation for Bid.
