Project Governance and Decision Making Sample Clauses

Project Governance and Decision Making 
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Project Governance and Decision Making

  • Decision Making For those matters set forth in Section 4.1.3 (Duties of the JSC) that the JSC is only to review and discuss (and not approve), the JSC will review and discuss such matters at the next JSC (or appropriate Working Group meeting, if applicable), [***] the JSC (or appropriate Working Group, if applicable) will serve as a forum for communication, input, and discussion, but will not prevent a Party from taking action if such Party has final decision making authority and operational control with respect to such matters and such matter was brought before the JSC in accordance with Section 4.2.1 (Resolution of JSC Matters), but such matter will not be escalated pursuant to Section 4.2.2(b) (Escalation). For clarity, Kiniksa shall have decision making authority and operational control with respect to all matters pertaining to the Development or Commercialization of the Product in the Kiniksa Field in the Territory, including the implementation of the Development Plan or Commercial Plan without escalation pursuant to Section 4.2.2(b) (Escalation), subject to certain matters over which the JSC has an approval right, which matters shall be governed by Section 4.2.2(b) (Escalation) in the event that the JSC is unable to agree thereon. For those matters set forth in Section 4.1.3 (Duties of the JSC) that the JSC is to determine whether to approve, the JSC shall operate by consensus and for such matters, the representatives of each Party shall have collectively one (1) vote on behalf of such Party; provided that no such vote taken at a meeting shall be valid unless a representative of each Party is present and participates in the vote. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each Party, in its sole discretion, by written notice to the other Party (which notice may be provided via email), may choose not to have representatives on the JSC, and in such case, the JSC to representatives of the other Party will make decisions on behalf of the JSC. The JSC must exercise its decision-making authority in good faith and in a commercially reasonable manner for the purpose of optimizing the Confidential Portions of this Exhibit marked as [***] have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment and have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential Treatment Requested by Kiniksa Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. commercial potential of, and financial returns from, the Product in the Kiniksa Field in the Territory consistent with Commercially Reasonable Efforts. The Parties acknowledge and agree that the JSC will not have the power to amend any of the terms of this Agreement or take any action to expand or narrow the responsibilities of the JSC, in each case, other than by agreement of the Parties as set forth in Section 17.5 (Amendments).

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • SITE-BASED DECISION MAKING A. The District shall provide the training and staff development to support accountability/site- based decision-making activities. Teachers shall be given release time to attend these programs.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.