Process FMEA Sample Clauses

The Process FMEA (Failure Mode and Effects Analysis) clause establishes a systematic approach for identifying and evaluating potential failures within a manufacturing or business process. It requires teams to analyze each step of the process, assess the risks associated with possible failure modes, and prioritize corrective actions based on the severity and likelihood of those failures. By proactively addressing weaknesses before they result in defects or disruptions, this clause helps organizations minimize process risks, improve product quality, and ensure more reliable operations.
Process FMEA. The Supplier must analyze his production processes on time, and hence carry out process 10.3
View SourceView Similar (3)
Process FMEA. The SUPPLIER prepares a process FMEA for all process steps of an article. Particular attention must be paid to the special features and, if applicable, the results of the product (design) FMEA. Furthermore, the process FMEA must be updated in case of changes and complaints. The FMEA must be presented for inspection at the request of the CLIENT. The proof of the creation of an FMEA must be proven at the latest with a corresponding cover sheet during the initial sampling. Minimum requirements are information on initial investment, change status, FMEA team as well as an overview of RPZ figures and the applied assessment key (preferably according to the AIAG standard or according to customer specifications).
View SourceView Similar (3)
Process FMEA. For all of an item’s process steps, the SUPPLIER creates a process FMEA. Special characteristics and any results of the product (design) FMEA must be specially considered. Furthermore, the process FMEAs must be updated if there are changes or claims. The FMEAs must be provided to the PURCHASER for inspection upon request. Proof of creation of an FMEA must be provided with a corresponding cover sheet no later than the time of initial sampling. Minimum requirements are information on the initial system, change status, FMEA team, and an overview of the RPZ numbers and the evaluation key used (preferably according to the AIAG standard or to customer specifications).
View Source
Process FMEA. The SUPPLIER shall prepare a process FMEA for all process steps of an item. In doing so, the special features and the results of the product (design) FMEA shall be particularly considered and evaluated. Furthermore, the process FMEA shall be updated in case of changes and complaints. The FMEA shall be submitted to the ▇▇▇▇ Group for inspection upon request. Proof of the creation of an FMEA must be provided with a corresponding cover sheet as part of the initial sampling at the latest. The minimum requirements are information on initial installation, change status, FMEA team as well as the result of the FEMA (preferably according to AIAG standard in the respective valid version or according to customer specification).
View Source
Process FMEA. The Supplier must analyze his production processes on time, and hence carry out process FMEA. In a Process FMEA, the special product characteristics must be analyzed. The FMEA procedure will be agreed between the Supplier and Oerlikon. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ expects a short traceable presentation of the FMEA results from 10.3
View Source

Related to Process FMEA

  • Manufacturing (a) The Supplier shall without limitation be responsible, at no additional cost to the Purchaser, for: sourcing and procuring all raw materials for the Products; obtaining all necessary approvals, permits and licenses for the manufacturing of the Products; providing sufficient qualified staff and workers to perform the obligations under this Purchase Agreement; implementing and maintaining effective inventory and production control procedures with respect to the Products; and handling other matters as reasonably requested by the Purchaser from time to time. (b) The Supplier shall not change any process, material, component, packaging or manufacturing location without the Purchaser’s express prior written approval.

  • Product Testing No later than [**] prior to a scheduled Delivery ARIAD US shall send to ARIAD SWISSCO the Delivery Documents for review. Following such review, unless within [**] of receipt of the Delivery Documents ARIAD SWISSCO gives written notice of rejection of the Product to be delivered, stating the reasons for such rejection, the Delivery shall proceed, and both Parties shall organize the same. Upon arrival at ARIAD SWISSCO nominated site it shall visually inspect the shipment of the Product to identify any damage to the external packaging. ARIAD SWISSCO may reject any shipment (or portion thereof) of the Product that is damaged by providing to ARIAD US reasonable evidence of damage within [**] after Delivery of such Product. If ARIAD SWISSCO does not so reject any shipment (or portion thereof) of the Product within [**] of Delivery of such Product, ARIAD SWISSCO shall be deemed to have accepted such shipment of the Product; provided, however, that in the case of the Product having any Latent Defect, ARIAD SWISSCO shall notify ARIAD US promptly once it becomes aware that a Product contains a Latent Defect and subsequently may reject such Product by giving written notice to ARIAD US of ARIAD SWISSCO’s rejection of such Product and shipping a representative sample of such Product or other evidence of Non-Conformance to ARIAD US within [**] after becoming aware of such Latent Defect, which notice shall include a description of the Latent Defect.

  • API If the Software offers integration capabilities via an API, your use of the API may be subject to additional costs or Sage specific policies and terms and conditions (which shall prevail in relation to your use of the API). You may not access or use the API in any way that could cause damage to us or the Software, or in contravention of any applicable laws. We reserve the right in our sole discretion, to: (i) update any API from time to time; (ii) place limitations around your use of any API; and (iii) deny you access to any API in the event of misuse by you or to otherwise protect our legitimate interests.

  • Scoring The number of routes each company operates (Route # 0001-2999, 8000-8199) will be multiplied by 2 to determine the daily number of trips. (Only accidents, breakdowns and service reports related to routes falling in this range will be used for the evaluation). The daily number of trips will be multiplied by 175 to arrive at the annual number of trips. The number of accidents, breakdowns and service complaints will be divided by the total number of trips to calculate a percent figure. Each company’s percentage will be compared to the total average. See below for a sample. BUS COMPANY NUMBER OF TOTAL BKDN PERCENT ACCIDENTS PERCENT2 SERVICE PERCENT3 ROUTES TRIPS BKDN ACCIDENTS REPORTS COMPLAINTS TO TRIPS TO TRIPS TO TRIPS A 360 58680 3 0.01% 27 0.05% 46 0.08% B 48 7824 3 0.04% 4 0.05% 39 0.50% C 123 20049 11 0.05% 9 0.04% 27 0.13% D 91 14833 0.00% 10 0.07% 11 0.07% E 124 20212 20 0.10% 19 0.09% 18 0.09% TOTALS 746 121598 37 0.03% 69 0.06% 141 0.12% To score, if a company’s percentage is less than or equal to the total percentage for that category, the company will be awarded 6 points per category. Percentages greater than the total percentage for each distinct category (Accident, Breakdown, Service Complaints) will be scored according to the following scale: Less than-Equal to Ave. 6 points 0-3% above average 5 points 4-7% above average 4 points 5-8% above average 3 points 9-12% above average 2 points 13-16% 1 points Greater than 17% 0 points Any circumstance whereby a Breakdown or Accident is found by PTS to be ‘Non Reported’ by vendor within the required timeframe (see G-36) will count as (20) ‘Reported’ instances for the purpose of this Contractor Evaluation Scoring.

  • Fabrication Making up data or results and recording or reporting them.