Process Evaluation Sample Clauses

Process Evaluation. AMD shall evaluate the Wafers provided by FoundryCo in accordance with the AMD-Specific Qualification Plan or the Qualification Plan, as applicable. The parties will then assess in accordance with the procedures set forth in Exhibit G whether the applicable manufacturing process fulfills the necessary requirements to manufacture the applicable Products in commercial production quantities in accordance with all applicable Specifications and requirements.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Process Evaluation. The Contractor will administer a process to evaluate all SMM processes on a regular basis, at least annually, and more frequently for processes where targeted process metrics have not been reached. This includes identifying areas where the targeted metrics are not met, and holding regular benchmarks, audits, maturity assessments and reviews. Contractor shall facilitate and coordinate the appropriate involvement of Government and the Integrated Service Providers to review proposed improvements and solicit ongoing feedback. Contractor shall maintain an ongoing process improvement plan to address the process improvement opportunities identified. Contractor shall regularly report to Government and EITS Governance on process evaluation results and the accomplishment of process improvements in the delivery of the Integrated Services. Contractor shall conduct an annual audit on the performance of core processes that identifies best practices and opportunities for improvement on all the Integrated Environment practices. Contractor shall provide reviews of the results and recommendations for addressing findings to EITS Governance.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Process Evaluation. The city administration and Schenker are positive, helpful and enthusiastic so we don’t recognise any barriers. There are no political or economic constraints either. Next year, Uppsala’s city centre will become a green zone. This implies that there will be new regulations implemented which force Schenkers/UGSABs to have even more environmentally friendly trucks. UGSABs trucks will have to be replaced by newer trucks and the City Move’s electric truck would be perfect for future deliveries. However there is one constraint: the battery on the truck has to last at least 4 hours driving time.
View Source
Process Evaluation. The Mission has carried out a series of external evaluations linked to project performance and quality of data that have derived in a series of recommendations described in this report. One evaluation in the process of being appointed is that of training. The final reports of external evaluations will be published in 2015. Currently the Mission is developing a coverage evaluation of USAID|PrevenSida, using the PLACE methodology; which consists on surveys to conglomerates of key populations in prioritized municipalities according to their HIV incidence and where the USAID|PrevenSida grantee NGOs are implementing HIV prevention actions.
View Source
Process Evaluation. The CityMove Project aims to contribute to a more sustainable urban freight transport by demonstration of effectiveness and efficiency of the CityMove urban freight vehicle concept to show that this solutions does help to tackle the problems cities are facing in terms of congestion, pollution, safety as well as freight transport efficiency. Proper evaluation is needed. Besides impact evaluation also process evaluation is important. Process evaluation tries to gain insight in the processes of planning and implementation and to assess the results and outcomes. Process evaluation aims to gain insight into the drivers and barriers during the preparation, implementation and operation of the proposed solution. It analyses the role of information communication and participation during these phases. It should contribute to the cross-site evaluation on Use Case level, and provide relevant input to the policy recommendations. Process evaluation consists of three building blocks: • process topics and issues; • the CityMove solution process evaluation (all prototypes). These objectives should be realised by collecting data on Use Case level. Techniques that can be used to collect data for process evaluation include: questionnaire surveys, focus groups, interviews. The proposed template for data collection (Process Evaluation Template) is provided in Annexes.
View Source
Process Evaluation. This study where the Eco statement and manufacturing results has been evaluated, has demonstrate the potential benefits of the ISC technology being developed. Thermoplastic resins special macromolecular structure involves significant advantages in terms of environmental sustainability, recyclability and mechanical properties. It has been seen that controlling temperature, time and velocity during the process can be achieved a perfect consolidation and stringers integration. The results obtained during the development of the entire project show full consolidation both within the laminates and between them and the stiffener structures as stringers showing material physical continuity. Even though it has been show some defects, above all in the transition tooling- thermoplastic areas, the non-destructive analysis have proved the in situ consolidation process reliability and repeatability. Next step is the process optimization, starting from the ancillary materials set up to the layup, this means achieving the industrialization way of the process. As regards of the reprocessing technology, from the test result obtained, the conclusions are: 1) the second pass can be an optimum process to repair no fully consolidated tow in the last ply positioned; 2) all the post-processing in oven conditions tested allows to repair porosity and delamination; 3) the post-processing in oven allows repairing structures with no total integration between ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and skin. This repair process could be applied to similar in-service damage with portable systems. In addition, has been stated that 400ºC and 10, 30 or 60 minutes cycles allow to recover between the 85 and 100% of the material properties.
View Source

Related to Process Evaluation

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and ▇▇▇▇ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Williamson County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following: A. Problems, delays, adverse conditions which may materially affect the ability to meet the objectives of an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, or preclude the attainment of Project Engineering Services units by established time periods; and such disclosure shall be accompanied by statement of actions taken or contemplated, and County assistance needed to resolve the situation, if any; and B. Favorable developments or events which enable meeting goals sooner than anticipated in relation to an applicable Work Authorization’s or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.