Poor Sample Clauses

Poor. The Device has one or more of the following issues: 1. The Device has sustained minor functional damage or product failure that can be easily repaired; 2. One or more of the Device ‘s minor components, peripherals, or accessories is missing or damaged but can be easily repaired or replaced; 3. The Device is missing a majority of original software installation disks or manuals; 4. The Device has more than normal visible wear and tear, including, but not limited to, cracks, dents, scratches, dirt and user-added stickers. If TechForward grades the Device as Poor, the Buyback Amount will be adjusted down by 50%.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Poor. The information in the target was unclear and/or incorrect; reading the source would be necessary for understanding. We aim to reach ―complete‖ scores in mathematics and museum translation, and ―useful‖ scores in patent translation. Dimensions not mentioned in the TAUS scoring are ―grammaticality‖ and ―naturalness‖ of the produced text. The grammar-based method of MOLTO will by definition guarantee grammaticality; failures in this will be fixed by fixing the grammars. Some naturalness will be achieved in the sense of ―idiomaticity‖: the compile-time transfer technique presented in Section
Sample 1
Poor. The contractor lacked a basic understanding of the work and the capacity to fulfill the requirements. Contractor’s performance was inadequate and contract requirements were often not met.
Sample 1
Poor. The right to vote in the United States is granted to individuals of what age? A. 18 C. 17 B. 16 D. 19
Sample 1
Poor. The information in the target was unclear and/or incorrect; reading the source would be necessary for understanding. We aim to reach “complete” scores in mathematics and museum translation, and “useful” scores in patent translation. 31 xxx.xxxxxxxxxx.xxx 32 xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx 33 xxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx/ nlp/IQMT/ Dimensions not mentioned in the TAUS scoring are “grammaticality” and “naturalness” of the produced text. The grammar-based method of MOLTO will by definition guarantee grammaticality; failures in this will be fixed by fixing the grammars. Some naturalness will be achieved in the sense of “idiomaticity”: the compile-time transfer technique presented in Section 1.2.3 will guarantee that forms of expression which are idiomatic for the domain are followed. The higher levels of text fluency reachable by Natural Language Generation techniques such as aggregation and referring expression selection have been studied in some earlier GF projects, such as (Xxxxx and Johannisson 2005). Some of these techniques will be applied in the mathematics and cultural heritage case studies, but the main focus is just on rendering information correctly. On all these measures, we expect to achieve significant improvements in comparison to the available translation tools, when dealing with in-grammar input.
Sample 1
Poor indicates the component will need repair or replacement now or in the very near future.
Sample 1
Poor. The information in the target was unclear and/or incorrect; reading the source would be necessary for understanding. We aim to reach “complete” scores in mathematics and museum translation, and “useful” scores in patent translation. Dimensions not mentioned in the TAUS scoring are “grammaticality” and “naturalness” of the produced text. The grammar-based method of MOLTO will by definition guarantee grammaticality; failures in this will be fixed by fixing the grammars. Some naturalness will be achieved in the sense of “idiomaticity”: the compile-time transfer technique presented in Section 1.2.3 will guarantee that forms of expression which are idiomatic for the domain are followed. The higher levels of text fluency reachable by Natural Language Generation techniques such as aggregation and referring expression selection have been studied in some earlier GF projects, such as (Xxxxx and Johannisson 2005). Some of these techniques will be applied in the mathematics and cultural heritage case studies, but the main focus is just on rendering information correctly. On all these measures, we expect to achieve significant improvements in comparison to the available translation tools, when dealing with in-grammar input. Enlarged project The new tasks aim at progress beyond the state of the art with the following outcomes: multilingual wiki: from low-quality translation (or hand-made translations) to truly automatic high-quality immediate updates of content. Existing wikis can provide multilingual content only as a result of major additional human effort, and there is no guarantee that the different language versions of the same article are semantically equivalent. controlled languages: from monolingual CNL systems to multilingual ones, where the involved languages can be translated into each other in a meaning-preserving way. Existing CNL systems are monolingual (usually English) and thus cannot be used by people not skilled in that language. interactive systems: from monolingual (or hand-translated or overly simplified machine-translated) systems to multilingual ones. Be Informed developed recently a first prototype of generation of textual explanations without the use of NLG technology. Based on that experience (xxx Xxxxxxxxx, X. et al., 2010), the MOLTO Enlarged EU work is expected to overcome some of the challenges that pattern based sentence generation alone cannot handle, or that take a lot of manual work to address. These include: dealing with morphology asp...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Poor. The annual agreement does not reflect each school counselor’s scope of work. • The percentage of time does not align with the recommended percentage of time for direct/indirect student services and program planning/school support. • Each agreement does not reflect the school counseling program’s vision statement, mission statement and goals. • The narrative does not provide a rationale of the school counselor’s use of time in support of the program goals.
Sample 1
Poor. The asset is approaching end of service life; condition below standard and a large portion of system exhibits significant deterioration. Increasing potential of affecting service;
Sample 1

Related to Poor

  • Ratings No “nationally recognized statistical rating organization” as such term is defined for purposes of Rule 436(g)(2) (i) has imposed (or has informed the Company that it is considering imposing) any condition (financial or otherwise) on the Company’s retaining any rating assigned to the Company or any securities of the Company or (ii) has indicated to the Company that it is considering any of the actions described in Section 7(c)(ii) hereof.

  • Moody’s Xxxxx’x Investors Service, Inc. and its successors.

  • Rating The Notes can be issued without the requirement that they have any rating from a nationally recognized statistical rating organization.

  • Credit Ratings Use commercially reasonable efforts to maintain at all times (a) a credit rating by each of S&P and Xxxxx’x in respect of the Term Facility and (b) a public corporate rating by S&P and a public corporate family rating by Xxxxx’x for the Borrower, in each case with no requirement to maintain any specific minimum rating.

  • BBB SCDHEC shall mean the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control and its authorized representatives. CCC. Statement of Basis shall mean the report(s) describing the corrective measure(s)/remedial action(s) being con ducted pursuant to South Carolina Hazardous Waste Management Regulations, as amended.

  • Financial Services The aim of cooperation shall be to achieve closer common rules and standards in areas including the following:

  • No Ratings There are no securities or preferred stock of or guaranteed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries that are rated by a “nationally recognized statistical rating organization,” as such term is defined under Section 3(a)(62) under the 1934 Act.

  • Secondary Market Trading and Standard & Poor’s If the Company does not maintain the listing of the Public Securities on Nasdaq or another national securities exchange, the Company will (i) apply to be included in Standard & Poor’s Daily News and Corporation Records Corporate Descriptions for a period of five years from the consummation of a Business Combination, (ii) take such commercially reasonable steps as may be necessary to obtain a secondary market trading exemption for the Company’s securities in the State of California and (iii) take such other action as may be reasonably requested by the Representative to obtain a secondary market trading exemption in such other states as may be requested by the Representative; provided that no qualification shall be required in any jurisdiction where, as a result thereof, the Company would be subject to service of general process or to taxation as a foreign corporation doing business in such jurisdiction.

  • Credit Rating With respect to the Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor, its senior unsecured, unsubordinated long-term debt rating, not supported by third party credit enhancement, and if such debt is no longer rated, then the corporate or long-term issuer rating of Competitive Supplier or Competitive Supplier’s Guarantor.

  • Standard No representation or warranty of Seller contained in Article III or of Buyer contained in Article IV shall be deemed untrue or incorrect for any purpose under this Agreement, and no Party shall be deemed to have breached a representation or warranty for any purpose under this Agreement, in any case as a consequence of the existence or absence of any fact, circumstance or event unless such fact, circumstance or event, individually or when taken together with all other facts, circumstances or events inconsistent with any representations or warranties contained in Article III, in the case of Seller, or Article IV, in the case of Buyer, has had or would be reasonably likely to have a Material Adverse Effect with respect to Seller or Buyer, respectively (disregarding for purposes of this Section 9.2 any materiality or Material Adverse Effect qualification contained in any representations or warranties). Notwithstanding the immediately preceding sentence, the representations and warranties contained in (x) Section 3.2(a), Section 3.2(d) and Section 3.3 shall be deemed untrue and incorrect if not true and correct in all respects, (y) Sections 3.2(b), 3.3(a), 3.3(b)(i) and 3.7, in the case of Seller, and Sections 4.2, 4.3(a), 4.3(b)(i) and 4.7, in the case of Buyer, shall be deemed untrue and incorrect if not true and correct in all material respects and (z) Section 3.8(a), in the case of Seller, and Section 4.8(a), in the case of Buyer, shall be deemed untrue and incorrect if not true and correct in all respects.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.