Plan Refinement Process Sample Clauses

Plan Refinement Process. In addition to the City’s policies and procedures under the Laws, the following process shall be considered the Plan Refinement Process for the Project. This process is the City’s right to review and approve preliminary and detailed plans for the Project, including aspects relating to construction material, quality and aesthetic standards. However, in all cases, the City’s approval shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. The Company shall submit to the City the Design Development Documents for review. Within thirty (30) days after receipt of the Design Development Documents, the City shall deliver to the Company written notice either: (A) confirming that such Design Development Documents are acceptable; or (B) stating any reasonable objection to such Design Development Documents, specifying the part or parts to which the City reasonably objects and including the specific basis for such objection. Upon confirmation that the Design Development Documents are acceptable, such Design Development Documents shall be deemed to be final and, accordingly shall become part of the Final Documents and Drawings for the Projects. Following approval of the Design Development Documents, the Company shall submit to the City for its review the Construction Drawings for each trade or other discrete aspect of construction of the Projects. Within thirty (30) days after the City receives the Construction Drawings, the City shall deliver to the Company written notice either: (i) confirming that such Construction Drawings are acceptable; or (ii) stating any reasonable objection to such Construction Drawings, specifying the part or parts to which the City reasonably objects and including the specific basis for such objection. Upon confirmation that the Construction Drawings conform to the corresponding approved Design Development Documents, such Construction Drawings shall be deemed to be final and, accordingly shall become part of the Final Documents and Drawings for the Project. If, at any stage of the Plan Refinement Process described in this section, the City objects to or rejects, as applicable, all or any portion of the Design Development Documents or the Construction Drawings, then, the Company shall endeavor in good faith to address such objection to the City’s reasonable satisfaction within twenty (20) days after the Company receives notice of such objection and resubmit the relevant documents to the City. Within twenty (20) business days after the City...
View SourceView Similar (2)
Plan Refinement Process. This Plan Refinement Process shall strictly govern development and construction of the Project. The City has reviewed and approved the Clubhouse Concept Plan and the Multi-Family Concept Plan, and those plans are deemed final. At its sole cost and expense, each of Multi-Developer and Course Owner shall submit for review and approval the following documents, which documents shall be submitted to the City in the order listed below, with respect to Multi-Family Project and Golf Course Improvement Project, respectively: (a) Site Plan. (b) Schematic Design Drawings.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Plan Refinement Process. For each of the Projects, Developer shall prepare and submit the Final Documents and Drawings to the City as part of the Plan Refinement Process. While City may provide written comments to Developer regarding the Final Documents and Drawings, City’s rights to approve the Final Documents and Drawings shall be limited to its rights under applicable City process(es) for Zoning and the Required Permits.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Plan Refinement Process. (a) Approvals. In accordance with the Plan Schedule, Developer, at its cost and expense, shall submit to Sewer Board for its approval the Schematic Design Drawings, the Design Development Documents, and the Construction Drawings. Developer, at its cost and expense, shall submit to Sewer Board for its approval a written detailed summary of any claimed adjustments to the Project Budget due to changes to the Project initiated by Sewer Board. The Developer shall prepare the Plan Schedule in accordance with this Agreement and to meet the Substantial Completion Date. The time limits identified in the Plan Schedule are of the essence. Within thirty (30) days after Sewer Board receives the Schematic Design Drawings, Design Development Documents, the Construction Drawings or Construction Schedule from Developer, Sewer Board shall deliver to Developer written notice of approval or rejection; provided that, in the case of a rejection, such notice shall: (i) specify the part or parts that Sewer Board is rejecting; and (ii) include the specific basis for such rejection. Any agreed upon adjustments to the then-current Project Budget as a result of proceeding through the Plan Refinement Process shall not be of effect until delivered to Sewer Board and promptly documented by Change Order after which they shall be reflected in an updated Project Budget delivered to the Sewer Board. Upon approval of the Schematic Design Drawings, the Design Development Documents, the Construction Drawings, and the Construction Schedule by the Sewer Board and Developer, such Schematic Design Drawings, Design Development Documents, Construction Drawings and Construction Schedule, respectively, shall be final, subject to modifications only by Change Orders.
View Source
Plan Refinement Process. This Plan Refinement Process shall govern development and construction of the Project. At its sole cost and expense, Company shall submit for review and approval the following documents, which documents shall be submitted to the City in the order listed below, with respect to the Project:
View Source
Plan Refinement Process 
View Source

Related to Plan Refinement Process

  • The Performance Improvement Process (a) The Performance Improvement Process will focus on the risks of non- performance and problem-solving. It may include one or more of the following actions: a requirement that the HSP develop and implement an improvement plan that is acceptable to the Funder; the conduct of a Review; an amendment of the HSP’s obligations; an in-year, or year-end, adjustment to the Funding, among other possible means of responding to the Performance Factor or improving performance. (b) Any performance improvement process begun under a prior service accountability agreement that was not completed under the prior agreement will continue under this Agreement. Any performance improvement required by a Funder under a prior service accountability agreement will be deemed to be a requirement of this Agreement until fulfilled or waived by the Funder.

  • Payment Process Subject to the terms and conditions established by the Agreement, the pricing per deliverable established by the Grant Work Plan, and the billing procedures established by Department, Department agrees to pay Grantee for services rendered in accordance with Section 215.422, Florida Statutes (F.S.).

  • Performance Improvement Plan timely and accurate completion of key actions due within the reporting period 100 percent The Supplier will design and develop an improvement plan and agree milestones and deliverables with the Authority 3.2 The Authority may from time to time make changes to the KPIs measured as set out in paragraph 3.1 above and shall issue a replacement version to the Supplier. The Authority shall give notice In Writing of any such change to the KPIs measured and shall specify the date from which the replacement KPIs must be used for future reports. Such date shall be at least thirty (30) calendar days following the date of the notice to the Supplier.

  • Project Management Plan Developer is responsible for all quality assurance and quality control activities necessary to manage the Work, including the Utility Adjustment Work. Developer shall undertake all aspects of quality assurance and quality control for the Project and Work in accordance with the approved Project Management Plan and

  • Equipment Procurement If responsibility for construction of the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities or System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades is to be borne by the Connecting Transmission Owner, then the Connecting Transmission Owner shall commence design of the Connecting Transmission Owner’s Attachment Facilities or System Upgrade Facilities or System Deliverability Upgrades and procure necessary equipment as soon as practicable after all of the following conditions are satisfied, unless the Developer and Connecting Transmission Owner otherwise agree in writing: 5.5.1 NYISO and Connecting Transmission Owner have completed the Interconnection Facilities Study pursuant to the Interconnection Facilities Study Agreement; 5.5.2 The NYISO has completed the required cost allocation analyses, and Developer has accepted his share of the costs for necessary System Upgrade Facilities and System Deliverability Upgrades in accordance with the provisions of Attachment S of the NYISO OATT; 5.5.3 The Connecting Transmission Owner has received written authorization to proceed with design and procurement from the Developer by the date specified in Appendix B hereto; and 5.5.4 The Developer has provided security to the Connecting Transmission Owner in accordance with Article 11.5 by the dates specified in Appendix B hereto.