Phi Theory Sample Clauses

Phi Theory. Phi-features across interfaces and modules, ed. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxx, and Xxxxxx Xxxxx, 295–328. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, and Xxxx Xxxxxxxx. 2006. Eccentric agreement and multiple Case check- ing. In Ergativity: Emerging Issues, ed. Xxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxxx, and Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, 47–77. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx X. 1977. Pronominal inflection in the Mayan languages. In Occasional paper
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Phi Theory. Phi-Features Across Modules and Interfaces, pp. 1-40. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Xxxxxxxx, X. (2011). Modern standard Arabic grammar. West Sussex, UK: Xxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx. Bergen, B. (2016). What the F. New York: Basic Books. Xxxxxx, X. (1999). The acquisition of second-language syntax. London: Xxxxxx Xxxxxx. Xxxxxxxxxx, X. & Xxxxxxxxx, D. (2011). A frequency dictionary of Arabic. London: Routledge. Xxxxxx, X. (2013). Syntax: A generative introduction. West Sussex, UK: Xxxxx-Xxxxxxxxx.
Sample 1
Phi Theory. Oxford: OUP. 83-129. Xxxxxxx, Xxx. 2010. Agreement and Head Movement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Xxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx. 1996. Clitic constructions. In X. Xxxxxxx and X. Xxxxxx, eds. Phrase Structure and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 213-276. Xxxxxx, Xxxxx. 1978. Word order variation: a typological study. In Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx, ed. Universals of Human Language: Volume 4, Syntax. Stanford: Stanford UP. 585-624. Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxx. 1981. Morphological haplology. Language 57. 791-817. Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx. 1988. The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6:391-434. Xxxxxxx, Xxxxxx. 1988. Pronouns and determiners: a DP analysis of Spanish nominals. Ms., University of Massachusetts, Boston. Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxx. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26. 79-123. Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx. 2003. Clitics and agreement in competition: ergative cross-referencing patterns. In Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx et al., Papers in Optimality Theory II. UMOP 26. Amherst, MA: GLSA. 421-49. Xxxx, Xxxxxxxx. 2001. Clitic doubling and the link with possessed noun phrase constructions: the case of Amharic object marking. Paper presented at the CUNY/SUNY/NYU Mini-Conference. Xxxx, Xxxxxxxx. 2007. The morphosyntax of complex verbal expressions in the Horn of Africa. Doctoral dissertation, CUNY. Yimam, Baye. 2004. Agreement phenomena in Amharic. In X. Xxxx, ed. Studia Aethiopica. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz. 319-336. Yimam, Baye. 2006. The interaction of tense, aspect and agreement in Amharic syntax. In Xxxx Xxxxxx et al., eds., Proceedings of ACAL 35. Somerville: Cascadilla Press. 193-202. Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxxx X. Xxxxxx. 1983. Cliticization vs. inflection: English n’t. Language 59. 502-513.
Sample 1
Phi Theory. Phi-Features Across Modules and Interfaces, ed. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx, Xxxxx Xxxxx, and Xxxxxx Xx´xxx, 251–294. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Xxxxxx, Xxxxx, and Xxxxxx Xxxxx. 2005. Unexpected plural inflections in Spanish: Reduplication and metathesis. Linguistic Inquiry 36:195–222. Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx. 2022. Allomorphy in Semitic discontinuous agreement: Evidence for a modular approach to postsyntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 1–55. Online First. Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx. To appear. Discontinuous first person agreement in Semitic and postsyntactic modularity. Xxxxx’x Journal of Afroasi- atic Languages and Linguistics Special Issue. Xxxxxx, Xxxxx. 1973. Urban and rural Arabic in Khu¯zista¯n. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 36:533–553. Xxxxxx, Xxxxx. 2011. Khuzestan Arabic. In Encyclopedia of Arabic Language and Linguistics, ed. Xxxx Xxxxxx and Xxxxxx xx Xxxx. Xxxxx Online. Available at xxxx://xx.xxx.xxx.xxxxx.xxxxxxxx.xxx/10.1163/1570-6699_eall_EALL_COM_ vol2_0072. Xxxxxx, Xxxx. To appear. The morphosyntax of imperative agreement in Amharic: A haplology analysis. Xxxxx’x Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics Special Issue. Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxx. 2011. The phonological pattern of phi-features in the perfective paradigm of Moroccan Arabic. Xxxxx’x Journal of Afroasiatic Languages and Linguistics 3:140–201. Xxxxxxx, Xxxx X, and Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. 2003. Verb conjugations and the strong pronoun declension in Standard Arabic. In Research in Afroasiatic Grammar II: Selected Papers from the Fifth Conference on Afroasiatic Languages, ed. Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, 305–338. Amsterdam: Xxxx Xxxxxxxxx. Xxxxxxxxxx´, Xxxxxxx. 2019. Interleaving syntax and postsyntax: Spellout before syntactic movement. Syntax 22:378–418. Xxxxx, Xxxxx. 2006. Wolane. Descriptive Grammar of an East Gurage Language (Ethiosemitic). Ko¨ln: Ko¨ppe.‌ Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx. 2011. Marked targets versus marked triggers and impoverishment of the dual. Linguistic Inquiry 42:413–444. Xxxxx, Xxxxxx Xxxx. 1992. Features, positions, and affixes in autonomous morphological structure. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Xxxxx, Xxxx. 1998. Impoverishment theory and morphosyntactic markedness. In Morphology and its Relation to Phonology and Syntax, ed. Xxxxxxx X Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx X Xxxxxxxx, and Xxxxxxx X Xxxxxxx, 264–285. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. Xxxxx, Xxxxx X. 2018. Xxxxx Xxxxx: A New Grammar with Texts. Leiden: Xxxxx.
Sample 1
Phi Theory. Phi-Features Across Modules and Interfaces, pp. 1-40. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Xxxxxxxx, X. (2009). Arabic second language acquisition of morphosyntax. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Xxxxxxxx, X. (2012). Modern standard Arabic grammar. West Sussex, UK: Xxxxx- Xxxxxxxxx. Xxxxxxxx, X. (2014). Email communication on September 22, 2014. Bergen, B. (2016). What the F. New York: Basic Books.
Sample 1

Related to Phi Theory

  • Theory Counseling is designed to assist an employee in eliminating a problem so that formal discipline will not be necessary.

  • Liability of Third Persons Dealing with Trustees No Person dealing with the Trustees shall be bound to make any inquiry concerning the validity of any transaction made or to be made by the Trustees or to see to the application of any payments made or property transferred to the Trust or upon its order.

  • Indemnification/Hold Harmless The Exhibitor who signs this contract and each person associated therewith (i.e. employees, spouses, guests, survivors, heirs, executors and representatives) herein agrees to indemnify, defend, hold harmless, and to release and forever discharge from any and all known and unknown damages, injuries, death, loss, liabilities, claims, costs, penalties, demands, actions, causes of action, judgments, and liabilities of every kind and description (including court costs and attorney’s fees), occasioned by, resulting from, and/or related to conduct, actions, and/or omissions of anyone connected with this event, including: Xxxx Xxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx, Inc. d.b.a. Rod Shows, Fairplex, all other Exhibitors/Vendors at the event; and each of their respective owners, shareholders, officers, their directors, employees, agents, staff, volunteers, independent contractors, representatives and servants. Exhibitor covenants and agrees that in case Rod Shows shall be made party to any litigation commenced by or against exhibitor or relating to this agreement or to the booth space hereunder, then exhibitor shall and will pay all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney fees and court costs, incurred by or imposed upon Rod Shows by virtue of any such litigation. SECURITY & PROPERTY DAMAGE Rod Shows will provide limited facility security and will exercise reasonable precaution for the protection of the exhibitors property. Rod Shows assumes no responsibility for loss or damage incurred during the rental period, or for any loss of items left onsite overnight. Neither Rod Shows or the vendor/exhibitor shall be responsible for any loss or damage to property of other party hereto including, but not limited to loss or damage occasioned by theft, fire, smoke, acts of God, public enemy, riot, civil commotion or other insurable hereto with respect to any loss or damage. It shall be the responsibility of Rod Shows and the Vendor/Exhibitor, respectively, to secure their own property insurance or otherwise protect themselves and their property against any such loss or damage. UNAVAILABILITY OF BOOTH SPACE

  • Indemnification Against Third-Party Claims Each Party (the Indemnifying Party) agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the other Party (the Indemnified Party) and the other Party’s Subsidiaries, predecessors, successors, Affiliates, and assigns, and all current and former officers, directors, members, shareholders, agents, contractors and employees of all such persons and entities (collectively, with Indemnified Party, the “Indemnitee Group”), from any and all Claims (as hereinafter defined).

  • HOLD HARMLESS/INDEMNIFICATION Contractor agrees to protect, defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Department, its elected and appointed officials, agents and employees from and against all legal, equitable or administrative claims, causes of action, damages, losses and expenses, of any kind or character, including but not limited to attorneys' fees and the costs of defense, arising in favor of Contractor’s employees or third parties on account of bodily injury, sickness, disease, death, personal injury, violation of an offender’s constitutional or statutory rights, or to injury to or destruction of tangible property except for such claims, causes of action, damages, losses or expenses which are solely due to the fault or negligence of the party seeking indemnity.

  • Indemnity/Hold Harmless The Union agrees to indemnify and hold the District harmless against any and all liabilities (including reasonable and necessary costs of litigation) arising from any and all claims, demands, suits, or other actions relating to the District's compliance or attempted compliance with either this Article or the requests of the Union pursuant to this Article, or relating to the conduct of the Union in administering this Article. The Union shall have the right to determine and decide all matters relating to settlement and conduct of litigation with respect to this Article. In no case shall District funds be involved in any remedy relating to this Article. Any underpayments to the Union resulting from the District's failure to make a required deduction shall be remedied by additional deductions from the affected employee(s). Any overpayments to the Union resulting from excessive deductions shall be remedied either by refund from the Union to the affected employee(s) or by a credit against future payments by the affected employee(s).

  • INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT Food Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City of Apopka and all of City’s officers, agents, and employees from and against all claims, liability, loss and expense, including reasonable costs, collection expenses, attorneys’ fees, and court costs which may arise because of the negligence (whether active or passive), misconduct, or other fault, in whole or in part (whether joint, concurrent, or contributing), of the Food Vendor, its officers, agents or employees in performance or non-performance of its obligations under the Agreement, including but not limited to, automobile negligence, foodborne illness negligence, or other claims and/or suits. Food vendor recognizes the broad nature of this indemnification and hold harmless clause, as well as the provision of a legal defense to the City when necessary, and voluntarily makes this covenant and expressly acknowledges the receipt of such good and valuable consideration provided by the City in support of these indemnification, legal defense and hold harmless contractual obligations in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. This clause shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Compliance with any insurance requirements required elsewhere within this Agreement shall not relieve the Food Vendor of its liability and obligation to defend, hold harmless and indemnify the City as set forth in this article of the Agreement. Nothing herein shall be construed to extend the City of Apopka’s liability beyond that provided in section 768.28, Florida Statutes. I have carefully read this agreement and fully understand its contents. I am aware that this is a release of liability and sign it of my own free will. Printed Name of Applicant: Signature of Applicant: Title of Applicant: Vendor/Business Name: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by means of physical presence or online notarization, this day of , 20 , by , and who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. Signature of Notary Stamp: City of Apopka Certificate of Insurance Checklist General Events and Activities Please note that this checklist is meant to represent the minimum requirements based on average exposure events. Events that involve high or unusual hazards may require higher limits of coverage. The City of Apopka reserves the right to require additional coverages, waive certain requirements, require higher limits or accept lower limits on a case by case basis after the review of the associated risk. ❑ Insurers – Must have an A.M. Best rating of A or better. ❑ Certificate Holder – City of Apopka, 000 X Xxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxx, XX 00000 ❑ Policy Terms - Must be current and cover the date(s) of the event or project. ❑ General Liability – Minimum requirements for all contractors and vendors. • $1,000,000 Each Occurrence • $100,000 Damage to Rented Premises • $2,000,000 General Aggregate • $1,000,000 Products and Completed Operations Aggregate ❑ Automobile Liability – Combined Single Limit of $300,000 (Required when vehicle functions as the workplace or is used to perform contracted work.) ❑ Workers’ Compensation – Minimum limits in the amount of $1,000,000/$1,000,000/$1,000,000 (Businesses employing more than four employees or in compliance with applicable state and federal laws) ❑ Liquor Liability – Minimum Limit of $1,000,000 (If Applicable) ❑ Additional Insured – The City of Apopka is to be included as a named additional insured on all policies except Workers’ Compensation. Additional Insured status, respective of General Liability, must include Completed Operations.

  • Indemnification and Hold Harmless a. The Contractor shall be responsible for and shall indemnify, defend, and hold DSHS harmless from any and all claims, costs, charges, penalties, demands, losses, liabilities, damages, judgments, or fines, of whatsoever kind of nature, arising out of or relating to a) the Contractor’s or any Subcontractor’s performance or failure to perform this Contract, or b) the acts or omissions of the Contractor or any Subcontractor.

  • Hold Harmless Contractor shall indemnify and save harmless County, its officers, agents, employees, and servants from all claims, suits, or actions of every name, kind, and description, brought for, or on account of: (A) injuries to or death of any person, including Contractor, or (B) damage to any property of any kind whatsoever and to whomsoever belonging, (C) any sanctions, penalties, or claims of damages resulting from Contractor’s failure to comply with the requirements set forth in the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and all Federal regulations promulgated thereunder, as amended, or (D) any other loss or cost, including but not limited to that caused by the concurrent active or passive negligence of County, its officers, agents, employees, or servants, resulting from the performance of any work required of Contractor or payments made pursuant to this Agreement, provided that this shall not apply to injuries or damage for which County has been found in a court of competent jurisdiction to be solely liable by reason of its own negligence or willful misconduct. The duty of Contractor to indemnify and save harmless as set forth herein, shall include the duty to defend as set forth in Section 2778 of the California Civil Code.

  • No Joint Venture or Partnership; No Third Party Beneficiaries (a) Borrower and Lender intend that the relationships created hereunder and under the other Loan Documents be solely that of borrower and lender. Nothing herein or therein is intended to create a joint venture, partnership, tenancy-in-common, or joint tenancy relationship between Borrower and Lender nor to grant Lender any interest in the Property other than that of mortgagee, beneficiary or lender.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.