Permitting Review Clause Samples

Permitting Review. This shall be assessed as part of the non-recurring Microwave Preparation Fee as specified in Exhibit B for BellSouth Property and Services Management and/or Project Managers whose time was reasonably necessary and actually spent reviewing permitting material and/or assisting Fuzion in the permitting process. BellSouth shall have final approval authority on all proposed conditions, (which shall not be unreasonably withheld) imposed by relevant jurisdictions and BellSouth shall have the right to be represented at all hearings in connection with governmental approvals.
View SourceView Similar (4)
Permitting Review. This shall be the sum of the hourly charges of BellSouth Property and Services Management and/or Project Managers whose time was reasonably necessary and actually spent reviewing permitting material and/or assisting Winstar in the permitting process. BellSouth shall have final approval authority on all proposed conditions, (which shall not be unreasonably withheld) imposed by relevant jurisdictions and BellSouth shall have the right to be represented at all hearings in connection with governmental approvals.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Permitting Review. This shall be the sum of the hourly charges of USWC Real Estate and/or Project Managers whose time was reasonably necessary and actually spent reviewing permitting material and/or assisting Pac-West in the permitting process. USWC shall have final approval authority on all proposed conditions, (which shall not be unreasonably withheld) imposed by relevant jurisdictions and USWC shall have the right to be represented at all hearings in connection with governmental approvals.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Permitting Review. The subject property is located outside of City limits and will therefore require permitting through Washington County or annexation of the property by the City to be utilized for the stormwater facility. Consultant shall review permitting requirements for each process and discuss permitting with Washington County and the City to develop a permit strategy for the project. The data collected in Tasks 5A through 5E will be incorporated into the siting study report.
View Source

Related to Permitting Review

  • Log Reviews All systems processing and/or storing PHI COUNTY discloses to 11 CONTRACTOR or CONTRACTOR creates, receives, maintains, or transmits on behalf of COUNTY 12 must have a routine procedure in place to review system logs for unauthorized access.

  • Independent Review Contractor shall provide the Secretary of ADS/CIO an independent expert review of any Agency recommendation for any information technology activity when its total cost is $1,000,000.00 or greater or when CIO requires one. The State has identified two sub-categories for Independent Reviews, Standard and Complex. The State will identify in the SOW RFP the sub-category they are seeking. State shall not consider bids greater than the maximum value indicated below for this category. Standard Independent Review $25,000 Maximum Complex Independent Review $50,000 Maximum Per Vermont statute 3 V.S.A. 2222, The Secretary of Administration shall obtain independent expert review of any recommendation for any information technology initiated after July 1, 1996, as information technology activity is defined by subdivision (a) (10), when its total cost is $1,000,000 or greater or when required by the State Chief Information Officer. Documentation of this independent review shall be included when plans are submitted for review pursuant to subdivisions (a)(9) and (10) of this section. The independent review shall include: • An acquisition cost assessment • A technology architecture review • An implementation plan assessment • A cost analysis and model for benefit analysis • A procurement negotiation advisory services contract • An impact analysis on net operating costs for the agency carrying out the activity In addition, from time to time special reviews of the advisability and feasibility of certain types of IT strategies may be required. Following are Requirements and Capabilities for this Service: • Identify acquisition and lifecycle costs; • Assess wide area network (WAN) and/or local area network (LAN) impact; • Assess risks and/or review technical risk assessments of an IT project including security, data classification(s), subsystem designs, architectures, and computer systems in terms of their impact on costs, benefits, schedule and technical performance; • Assess, evaluate and critically review implementation plans, e.g.: • Adequacy of support for conversion and implementation activities • Adequacy of department and partner staff to provide Project Management • Adequacy of planned testing procedures • Acceptance/readiness of staff • Schedule soundness • Adequacy of training pre and post project • Assess proposed technical architecture to validate conformance to the State’s “strategic direction.” • Insure system use toolsets and strategies are consistent with State Chief Information Officer (CIO) policies, including security and digital records management; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to security and systems integration with other applications within the Department, and within the Agency, and existing or planned Enterprise Applications; • Perform cost and schedule risk assessments to support various alternatives to meet mission need, recommend alternative courses of action when one or more interdependent segment(s) or phase(s) experience a delay, and recommend opportunities for new technology insertions; • Assess the architecture of the proposed hardware and software with regard to the state of the art in this technology. • Assess a project’s backup/recovery strategy and the project’s disaster recovery plans for adequacy and conformance to State policy. • Evaluate the ability of a proposed solution to meet the needs for which the solution has been proposed, define the ability of the operational and user staff to integrate this solution into their work.

  • Program Review The State ECEAP Office will conduct a review of each contractor’s compliance with the ECEAP Contract and ECEAP Performance Standards every four years. The review will involve ECEAP staff and parents. After the Program Review, the State ECEAP Office will provide the contractor with a Program Review report. The contractor must submit an ECEAP Corrective Action Plan for non-compliance with ECEAP Performance Standards. The Plan must be approved by the State ECEAP Office.

  • Review of assessment The assessment of the applicable percentage should be subject to annual review or earlier on the basis of a reasonable request for such a review. The process of review shall be in accordance with the procedures for assessing capacity under the Supported Wage System.

  • Standard of Review The Parties acknowledge and agree that the standard of review for any avoidance, breach, rejection, termination or other cessation of performance of or changes to any portion of this integrated, non-severable Agreement (as described in Section 22) over which FERC has jurisdiction, whether proposed by Seller, by Buyer, by a non-party of, by FERC acting sua sponte shall be the “public interest” standard of review set forth in United Gas Pipe Line Co. v.