Performance Properties Sample Clauses

Performance Properties. To measure the performance of the different parties in the negotiation, a number of different properties from the literature (e.g., [13], [14]) are included in the library: • Negotiator Final Utility: a number between 0 and 1, indicating the negotiator’s utility for the final bid in the negotiation (i.e., the bid that both parties agreed upon). The higher the utility, the higher the satisfaction of the negotiator. A high (but < 1) number does not mean that the negotiator could not have performed better. Furthermore, the utility of the one does not give any information about the utility of the other. • Pareto Distance: a number between 0 and √2, indicating the shortest distance from the final bid in the negotiation to the Pareto Efficient Frontier. The Pareto Efficient Frontier (PEF) is the set of bids for which there exists no better bid for both parties, see e.g., [13]. Let xi (respectively yi) be the utility of negotiator X (respectively Y) for bid bi. The distance d(b1, b2) between bids b1 and b2 is defined
View Source
Performance Properties. The results with respect to the performance of the negotiators in Experiment 2 are shown in Table 3. The first row indicates the mean outcomes over all 38 HC traces, the second row indicates the mean outcomes over all 38 CC traces, and the last two rows show the results of the paired t-tests.
View Source
Performance Properties. The results with respect to the performance of the negotiators in Experiment 1 are shown in Table 1. The first row contains the mean outcomes over all 9 HH traces. The second row contains the mean outcomes over all 9 CC traces. To test whether the differences between these two means were significant, paired t-tests have been performed, of which the results are shown in the last two rows. For example, the first column states that in the HH traces, the mean utility of the buyer was 0.87, that in the CC traces, the mean utility of the buyer was 0.88, but that this difference was not significant (t=0.38, p<0.717).
View Source

Related to Performance Properties

  • Performance Requirements A. There is no guaranteed minimum amount of work which will be ordered under this Contract. B. The total Contract amount will not exceed $4,900,000. C. This is a Contract for work specified in individual Job Orders. Work ordered prior to but not completed by the expiration of the Contract period, and any additional work required as a result of unforeseen conditions encountered during construction up to six (6) months after the contract expiration date, will be completed with all provisions of this Contract still in force. Performance time for each Job Order issued under this Contract will be determined in accordance with the Contract. This performance time will be determined and agreed upon by both Parties for each individual Job Order. Contractor must self-perform 20% of the Work under this Contract for ‘A’ and ‘B’ licenses. Contractor must self-perform 75% of the Work under this Contract, unless otherwise approved by the County, for ‘C’ licenses. D. This is an indefinite-quantity Contract for the supplies or services specified and effective for the period stated. Work or performance shall be made only as authorized by Job Orders issued in accordance with the ordering procedures clause. The Contractor agrees to furnish to the County when and if ordered, the supplies or services specified in the Contract up to and including the quantity designated in the Job Orders issued as the maximum designated in the Contract.

  • Performance Monitoring ‌ A. Performance Monitoring of Subrecipient by County, State of California and/or HUD shall consist of requested and/or required written reporting, as well as onsite monitoring by County, State of California or HUD representatives. B. County shall periodically evaluate Subrecipient’s progress in complying with the terms of this Contract. Subrecipient shall cooperate fully during such monitoring. County shall report the findings of each monitoring to Subrecipient. C. County shall monitor the performance of Subrecipient against the goals, outcomes, milestones and performance standards required herein. Substandard performance, as determined by County, will constitute non-compliance with this Contract for which County may immediately terminate the Contract. If action to correct such substandard performance is not taken by Subrecipient within the time period specified by County, payment(s) will be denied in accordance with the provisions contained in this Paragraph 47 of this Contract. D. HUD in accordance with 24 CFR Part 570 Subpart O, 570.902, will annually review the performance of County to determine whether County has carried out its Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) assisted activities in a timely manner and has significantly disbursed CDBG funds and met the mandated “1.5 ratio” threshold. Subrecipient is responsible to ensure timely drawdown of funds.

  • Performance Appraisals 3201 The Employer shall complete a written appraisal of a nurse's performance at least bi-annually. Upon request, the nurse shall be given an exact copy of the appraisal. 3202 The nurse shall have an opportunity to read such document. 3203 The nurse's signature on such document merely signifies that the contents of the document have been read. 3204 If the nurse disputes the appraisal, she/he may file a reply to the document in accordance with Article 29, and/or she/he may file a grievance under Article 12 of this Agreement.

  • Project Goals The schedule, budget, physical, technical and other objectives for the Project shall be defined.

  • Performance Expectations The Charter School’s performance in relation to the indicators, measures, metrics and targets set forth in the CPF shall provide the basis upon which the SCSC will decide whether to renew the Charter School’s Charter Contract at the end of the charter term. This section shall not preclude the SCSC from considering other relevant factors in making renewal decisions.