Parsing Sample Clauses

POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
Parsing. ‌ The monolingual parsing features we use are simply parsing model scores under the parser of Petrov and ▇▇▇▇▇ (2007). While that parser uses heavily refined PCFGs with rule probabilities defined at the refined symbol level, we interact with its posterior distribution via posterior marginal probabilities over unrefined symbols. In particular, to each unrefined anchored production iAj iBkCj, we associate a single feature whose value is the marginal quantity log P(iBkCj iAj, s) under the monolingual parser. These scores are the same as the variational rule scores of Matsuzaki et al. (2005).6
View SourceView Similar (2)
Parsing. The XML is then parsed to add more information, including tags to link bibliographic information and related information.
View Source
Parsing. In content implemented using markup languages, elements have complete start and end tags, elements are nested according to their specifications, elements do not contain duplicate attributes, and any IDs are unique, except where the specifications allow these features. (Level A) Y Y ▇▇▇.▇▇▇ pages are coded using correct markup languages and tags.
View Source
Parsing. As each forum thread posts a question, each orginal post is not included to be a part of a proposal. Instead, each comment that includes a response to that comment that choose an opposite side in the debate is used as an entry to the data set. For example, if a user asks the question ”Is pizza healthy?”, this thread could contain a comment annotated with the side of ”no”, where yet another user can reply to this comment picking the side of ”yes”. This pair of two comments is then interpreted as a proposal-response pair. This results in 96154 rejections and 51402 acceptances. As the data set is quite large in this case, 10-fold cross validation is not used to measure performance. Instead, the data is randomly shuffled and divided into 80% being the training set and 20% being the test set. As this data is divided in a ratio between disagreements and agreements of roughly 2:1, applying any form of down or upsampling is not needed. Response contains the bigram ”Yeah but ” 4.15 Response contains ”But” 3.91
View Source

Related to Parsing

  • Central Office Switch A switch used to provide Telecommunications Services, including, but not limited to, an End Office Switch or a Tandem Switch. A Central Office Switch may also be employed as a combination End Office/Tandem Office Switch.

  • Analytics 1.1. IFS may track and analyze the usage of the IFS Offering for purposes of determining usage made of the IFS Offering, for the purposes of security, to assist customers, and for improving the Software and Services and the user experience in using such Software and Services. For example, IFS may use this information to help customers derive more value from the Software and Services, to understand and analyze trends, or to track which features are used most often in order to improve the Software and Services. IFS may share anonymous usage data with its service providers for the purpose of helping in such tracking, analysis and improvements. Additionally, IFS may share such anonymous usage data on an aggregate basis in the normal course of operating their business; for example, IFS may share information publicly to show trends about the general use of its software and services. TERMS - SERVICES

  • Loop A transmission path that extends from a Main Distribution Frame or functionally comparable piece of equipment in a Customer's serving End Office, to the Rate Demarcation Point (or NID if installed at the Rate Demarcation Point) in or at the Customer's premises. The actual transmission facilities used to provide a Loop may utilize any of several technologies.

  • Dewatering (a) Where the whole of a site is so affected by surface water following a period of rain that all productive work is suspended by agreement of the Parties, then dewatering shall proceed as above with Employees so engaged being paid at penalty rates as is the case for safety rectification work. This work is typically performed by Employees engaged within CW1, CW2 or CW3 classifications. When other Employees are undertaking productive work in an area or areas not so affected then dewatering will only attract single time rates. (b) Where a part of a site is affected by surface water following a period of rain, thus rendering some areas unsafe for productive work, consistent with the Employer’s obligations under the OH&S Act, appropriate Employees shall assist in the tidying up of their own work site or area if it is so affected. Where required, appropriate Employees will be provided with the appropriate PPE. Such work to be paid at single time rates. Productive work will continue in areas not so affected. (c) To avoid any confusion any ‘dewatering’ time which prevents an Employee from being engaged in their normal productive work is not included in any calculation for the purposes of determining whether an Employee is entitled to go home due to wet weather (refer clauses 32.4 and 32.5)

  • Switching All of the negotiated rates, terms and conditions set forth in this Section pertain to the provision of local and tandem switching.