Open Evaluations Sample Clauses

Open Evaluations. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a unit member will be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the unit member by certificated administrative and/ or supervisory personnel. Unit members will not be evaluated or formally observed immediately before or after a school holiday of three or more school days, immediately following a unit member’s return from an extended leave, or during an official school visitation day. WCPS and the Association also agree that unit members are prohibited from any involvement in the evaluation process of other unit members.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Open Evaluations. All observations of an employee’s performance shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee. Evaluations of employees shall not be restricted to direct observations. All data pertinent to the employee’s performance may be used to evaluate the employee and any data used in an evaluative manner shall be made known to the employee. Upon request an employee shall be given a copy of any observation or evaluation report prepared by his/her evaluator at least one (1) workday before any conference to discuss it.
Sample 1Sample 2
Open Evaluations. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of an employee shall be conducted and with full knowledge of the employee. The use of eavesdropping, public address systems and similar surveillance devices shall be strictly prohibited.
Sample 1
Open Evaluations. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a professional or temporary professional Employee shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the Employee. All regular full-time professional staff members will be observed at least twice during a school year by the Administration. Temporary Professional Employees will he observed three times during a school year. No prior announcement of the observation is necessary nor is any alteration of the lesson plan required. However, if the building principal observes poor planning is a contributing factor to classroom management problems, the staff member will be required to submit lesson plans in greater detail.
Sample 1
Open Evaluations. All observations of an employee’s performance shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee in accordance with N.J.S.A. 18A:28-5. Teacher Evaluations will be consistent with the Teacher Effectiveness and Accountability Act, N.J.S.A. 18A:6-117, et. al.
Sample 1

Related to Open Evaluations

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and xxxx them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. No response TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code § 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Yes - No Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • BID EVALUATION The Commissioner reserves the right to accept or reject any and all Bids, or separable portions of Bids, and waive technicalities, irregularities, and omissions if the Commissioner determines the best interests of the State will be served. The Commissioner, in his/her sole discretion, may accept or reject illegible, incomplete or vague Bids and his/her decision shall be final. A conditional or revocable Bid which clearly communicates the terms or limitations of acceptance may be considered, and Contract award may be made in compliance with the Bidder’s conditional or revocable terms in the Bid.

  • EMPLOYEE EVALUATIONS 3. Any matter for which there is recourse under State or Federal statutes.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the Fall semester.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.