Multiplicity Clause Samples

Multiplicity. If and when included within the term “Tenant,” as used in this instrument, there is more than one person, firm or corporation, all shall jointly arrange among themselves for their joint execution of a notice specifying an individual at a specific address within the continental United States for the receipt of notices and payments to Tenant. All parties included within the terms “Landlord” and “Tenant,” respectively, shall be bound by notices given in accordance with the provisions of Section 25 to the same effect as if each had received such notice.

Multiplicity. A total of six hypothesis tests will be conducted to address the primary and secondary objectives of the study. A combination of gate-keeping and Bonferroni adjustment strategies will be employed to control the overall type I error rate. The hypothesis tests and the testing order (multiplicity adjustment) are outlined in Figure 15-1.

Multiplicity. The necessity for juxtaposing multiple issues simultaneously, treating phenomena not as isolated but as relational, and therefore seeking more complex intellectual interfaces as the fora for investigating them.

Multiplicity. Part of what elevates the nuance of examining identity-building in RPGs is that the identities under construction are typically not one’s own––at least not evidently. In roleplaying, no matter what form it may take, there always exists some level of distinction between players/participants and their characters. This distinction is important and often self-evident to those who transgress between the mundane and the fantastical, but as we will better understand in Chapter 3, these games have transmutative properties that can complicate how we hold and experience our multiplicity of identities. ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ describe the role in roleplay as functioning like an ‘alibi.’10 This alibi is basically an acknowledgement that characters are separate entities from their players; the fictionalized actions that take place in the fictionalized world are precisely that: fictional. Ludic scholar ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ refines this concept of alibi, describing it as part of the social contract by which “players accept the premise that any actions in the game are taken by the character, not the player.”11 The alibi is effectively what allows a player to claim something like “I didn’t yell at you; my character yelled at yours.” Although the alibi may seem merely like a tool for gaslighting oneself and others into accepting an alternative reality, its uses are well-established and documented in fields that utilize roleplay. Most notably, drama therapists frequently engage the concept of aesthetic doubling, in which participants 10 ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, “First Person Audience and the Art of Painful Role-Playing,” in Immersive Gameplay: Essays on Participatory Media and Role-Playing (Jefferson: ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ & Company, 2012), 16. simultaneously perceive themselves as both themselves and their characters.12 In drama therapy, exercising aesthetic doubling may be important for helping participants retain a sense of distance and control, even as they may reenact difficult, tense, or even traumatic moments of their own

Multiplicity. Our overview table presents different possible aspects able to be used to provide a more tailored approach to training. Our training will be delivered by creating programmes from appropriate combinations of these existing training modules - an approach that affords great flexibility in accommodating user needs. In the section on the actual training programs that we propose, we will characterize the training modules described within the matrix. In the sections below we map the training modules that partners within and outside of CompBioMed are currently offering. We then used this to formulate a Training Plan that the Centre of Excellence will implement in the next 2.5 years.

Multiplicity. Another key property that is not adequately accounted for in the current QM logical model and needs to be added is the concept of multiplicity. Multiplicity refers to the reuse of the same questionnaire multiple times. This could happen where a patient had multiple follow ups where the follow-up questionnaire is exactly the same, or perhaps multiple blood samples taken over time and the same sample form filled for each instance. Depending on the rules of the study, a questionnaire could be filled once or multiple times. If it is to be filled multiple times, then it is possible that the number of times it can be filled could be determined by data entry or calculation. For example, a question asking how many household members there are, and then using that answer to limit the number of “household member“ questionnaires that can be filled for this household. It also could be that the number of questionnaires is a fixed number set at the beginning of the study. For example, the study protocol could call for only three follow up visits to each household. It could also be the case that the ability to add new questionnaire instances is determined by a Boolean true/false condition evaluated constantly based on data entry or calculation that allows new instances to be created. It could also be that there is no limit to the number of new instances of the questionnaire that could be filled. A nosocomial study that has brief follow ups for every day that a patient stays in the hospital may require a practically unlimited (or at least unforeseeable) number of questionnaires to be filled.