Model based Testing Approaches and Tools Sample Clauses

Model based Testing Approaches and Tools. There are several model based testing approaches that can be applied at different testing level: system testing, integration testing, regression testing, component testing, unit testing... In [10] a survey of model based testing approaches can be found. The approaches are classified depending on the models that use, the testing level, the level of automation, the level of complexity, support tools... Although usage and structural models can be also useful as complement, most of the approaches use behaviour models for generating test cases such as finite state models or state charts. There are also several model-based testing tools, in the Table 1 some of the most known are mentioned. Table 1: Model-based testing tools Tool Licensing Modeling Language Conformiq Test Generator Commercial UML Statecharts LEIRIOS Test Generator – LTG/UML Commercial UML 2.0 xxx.xxxxxx.xxx Open source Directed graph ModelJUnit Open source FSM and EFSM in java NModel Open source FSM in c# ParteG Open source State machine Reactis Commercial Mathlab Simulink Stateflow SpecExplorer Free Spec#, Asml Statemate Automatic Test Generator / Rhapsody ATG Commercial Statemate statecharts and UML state machine TestOptimal Commercial, free Community Edition State diagram TTModeler (TTWorkbench) Commercial The UML Testing Profile (UTP) T-Vec Tester for simulink Commercial Simulink and MATRIXx ZigmaTEST Commercial Finite state machine (FSM) The previous tools are specific tools for generating test cases from models. However, model based testing will happen in a MDD environment where the SUT is modelled and transformed from higher abstraction models to lower abstraction models. The generation of test cases can be also understood as a kind of transformation. So more MDD generic tools that are used for modelling can also be useful such as Eclipse based tools: Papyrus, TOPCASED, IBM Rational Software Architect, MDDi, etc. as well as transformation tools such as MOFScript, OAW, ATL and Acceleo.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Model based Testing Approaches and Tools

  • RE-WEIGHING PRODUCT Deliveries are subject to re- weighing at the point of destination by the Authorized User. If shrinkage occurs which exceeds that normally allowable in the trade, the Authorized User shall have the option to require delivery of the difference in quantity or to reduce the payment accordingly. Such option shall be exercised in writing by the Authorized User.

  • Treatment Program Testing The Employer may request or require an employee to undergo drug and alcohol testing if the employee has been referred by the employer for chemical dependency treatment or evaluation or is participating in a chemical dependency treatment program under an employee benefit plan, in which case the employee may be requested or required to undergo drug or alcohol testing without prior notice during the evaluation or treatment period and for a period of up to two years following completion of any prescribed chemical dependency treatment program.

  • Software Components At any time during the contract period of performance, the Government may require the Contractor to remedy any failure of the software to comply with the requirements of this contract. Support shall consist of correction of errors, provision of modifications, improvements, and other products the original manufacturer makes available to the Government without charge. The Government shall also be provided full documentation of changes and/or modifications to the software provided to meet the Government's requirements.

  • Program Components Activities and services delivered under this Program Element align with Foundational Programs and Foundational Capabilities, as defined in Oregon’s Public Health Modernization Manual, (xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx.xxx/oha/PH/ABOUT/TASKFORCE/Documents/public_health_modernization_man ual.pdf) as well as with public health accountability outcome and process metrics (if applicable) as follows:

  • Exclusion Criteria Subjects fulfilling any of the following criteria are not eligible for participation in this study.

  • Repair Testing At the time of repair of a LIS trunk group, at no additional charge, tests will be performed to ensure that the service is operational and meets the applicable technical parameters.

  • Loop Testing/Trouble Reporting 2.1.6.1 Think 12 will be responsible for testing and isolating troubles on the Loops. Think 12 must test and isolate trouble to the BellSouth portion of a designed/non- designed unbundled Loop (e.g., UVL-SL2, UCL-D, UVL-SL1, UCL-ND, etc.) before reporting repair to the UNE Customer Wholesale Interconnection Network Services (CWINS) Center. Upon request from BellSouth at the time of the trouble report, Think 12 will be required to provide the results of the Think 12 test which indicate a problem on the BellSouth provided Loop.

  • Vehicle Base Specifications Note: The actual vehicle awarded may exceed the minimum specifications stated below. The Authorized User may elect to add additional Options, delete Options, or substitute a vehicle feature that is an Option with another Option. See Contract Section III.6

  • Follow-up Testing An employee shall submit to unscheduled follow-up drug and/or alcohol testing if, within the previous 24-month period, the employee voluntarily disclosed drug or alcohol problems, entered into or completed a rehabilitation program for drug or alcohol abuse, failed or refused a preappointment drug test, or was disciplined for violating the provisions of this Agreement and Employer work rules. The Employer may require an employee who is subject to follow-up testing to submit to no more than six unscheduled drug or alcohol tests within any 12 month period.

  • Laboratory Testing All laboratories selected by UPS Freight for analyzing Controlled Substances Testing will be HHS certified.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.