Milestones and targets. Table 5a - Statistical milestones and targets relating to your applicants, entrants or student body (e.g. HESA, UCAS or internal targets) Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Baseline Baseline year data Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible, however you may use text) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximium) NS-SEC (HESA Table T1b) Percentage from NS-SEC classes 4,5,6 & 7 2009/10 41.1 41.1 41.1 41.1 41.1 41.1 The aim is to retain current performance despite the negative effects upon these students of the new financial arrangements. This is well above the current benchmark. Care-leavers Numbers of new care-leavers commencing full time undergraduate study 2009/10 48 55 55 55 55 55 The aim is to increase access for looked after young people Non continuation: Young (HESA Table T3a) Non-continuation following year of entry: full time first degree entrants 2009/10 10.1 9.7 9.3 8.9 8.5 8.1 The aim is to improve retention to meet the benchmark level over the five year period, allowing for one standard deviation variance Non continuation: Mature (HESA Table T3a) Non-continuation following year of entry: full time first degree entrants 2009/10 17.4 16.7 16 15.3 14.5 13.7 The aim is to improve retention to meet the benchmark level over the five year period, allowing for one standard deviation variance Completion/Non continuation (other - please give details in t Table 3d Non-continuation following year of entry: other undergraduate entrants 2009/10 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 Current performance is significantly better than benchmark, and the intention is to maintain this performance
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Access Agreement
Milestones and targets. Table 5a - Statistical milestones and targets relating to your applicants, entrants or student body (e.g. HESA, UCAS or internal targets) Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Baseline Baseline year data Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible, however you may use text) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximium) NS-SEC (HESA Table T1b) Percentage from NS-SEC classes 4,5,6 & 7 2009/10 41.1 41.1 41.1 41.1 41.1 41.1 The aim is to retain current performance despite the negative effects upon these students of the new financial arrangements. This is well above the current benchmark. Care-leavers Numbers of new care-leavers commencing full time undergraduate study 2009/10 48 55 55 55 55 55 The aim is to increase access for looked after young people Non continuation: Young (HESA Table T3a) Non-continuation following year of entry: full time first degree entrants 2009/10 10.1 9.7 9.3 8.9 8.5 8.1 The aim is to improve retention to meet the benchmark level over the five year period, allowing for one standard deviation variance Non continuation: Mature (HESA Table T3a) Non-continuation following year of entry: full time first degree entrants 2009/10 17.4 16.7 16 15.3 14.5 13.7 The aim is to improve retention to meet the benchmark level over the five year period, allowing for one standard deviation variance Completion/Non continuation (other - please give details in t the next column) Table 3d Non-continuation following year of entry: other undergraduate entrants 2009/10 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 Current performance is significantly better than benchmark, and the intention is to maintain this performanceperformance Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around your outreach work (including collaborative outreach work where appropriate) or other initiatives to illustrate your progress towards increasing access. These should be measurable outcomes based targets and should focus on the number of pupils reached by a particular activity/programme, or number of schools worked with, and what the outcomes were, rather than simply recording the nature/number of activities. Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Baseline Baseline year data Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible, however you may use text) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximium) University Of Huddersfield Where your arrangements are the same as for other courses, we would encourage you to cross-refer to your main agreement wherever possible, rather than seeking to replicate information from that main document here.
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Access Agreement
Milestones and targets. Table 5a - Statistical milestones and targets relating to your applicants, entrants or student body (e.g. HESA, UCAS or internal targets) Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Baseline Baseline year data Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible, however you may use text) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximium) NS-SEC (HESA Table T1b) Percentage from NS-SEC classes 4,5,6 & 7 2009/10 41.1 41.1 41.1 41.1 41.1 41.1 The aim is to retain current performance despite the negative effects upon these students of the new financial arrangements. This is well above the current benchmark. Care-leavers Numbers of new care-leavers commencing full time undergraduate study 2009/10 48 55 55 55 55 55 The aim is to increase access for looked after young people Non continuation: Young (HESA Table T3a) Non-continuation following year of entry: full time first degree entrants 2009/10 10.1 9.7 9.3 8.9 8.5 8.1 The aim is to improve retention to meet the benchmark level over the five year period, allowing for one standard deviation variance Non continuation: Mature (HESA Table T3a) Non-continuation following year of entry: full time first degree entrants 2009/10 17.4 16.7 16 15.3 14.5 13.7 The aim is to improve retention to meet the benchmark level over the five year period, allowing for one standard deviation variance Completion/Non continuation (other - please give details in t the next column) Table 3d Non-continuation following year of entry: other undergraduate entrants 2009/10 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 14.3 Current performance is significantly better than benchmark, and the intention is to maintain this performance
Appears in 1 contract
Sources: Access Agreement