Milestones and targets. This document reflects the institution’s own analysis of its performance against the targets and milestones that it set itself in its access agreement for 2010-11. OFFA considered it as part of our holistic consideration of the institution's progress against its access agreement; we also took into account the other information provided in the monitoring return, the institution's general performance on widening participation, and our knowledge of its access agreement and previous monitoring rounds. For further information about monitoring performance against milestones and targets, please see part four of the report, Access agreement and widening participation strategic assessment monitoring: Outcomes for 2010-11. Table 1 contains a report from the institution on its progress against the milestones it set itself in its access agreement relating to 2010-11. Table 1a): This shows statistical milestones/targets relating to the institution’s applicants, entrants or student body – e.g. those based on HESA, Ucas or similar data that the institution uses to measure the outcomes of its widening participation work. Table 1b): This shows other milestones and targets that the institution chose to include. These typically relate to outreach, lifelong learning, or institutional mission and targets. Table 2 sets out the HESA performance indicators for young entrants covering state school, social class (National Statistics Socio-economic Classification – NS-SEC) and low participation neighbourhoods (LPN). These are reproduced to provide a context for the institution’s overall performance. Please note that 2010-11 performance indicators are now also available; however, these had not been published at the time institutions were submitting their monitoring returns and are not presented here. For more information on HESA performance indicators, see xxx.xxxx.xx.xx/xx. Table 3 provides the institution’s commentary on its progress. Specifically, we invited institutions to: - comment on the level of progress made against their access agreement targets - set the figures in some context, for example, if there were any external factors which may have influenced them - provide explanations where they did not meet targets or where progress was less than anticipated.
Milestones and targets. Participation ⮚ Over the period of this Agreement annually to remain above national average for entrants: o from state schools or colleges o from social classes IIM, IV, V o from low participation neighbourhoods o in receipt of disabled students’ allowance Summer schools ⮚ by 2008, at least 100% expansion of participants from a base of 110 ⮚ by 2008, at least 70% of participants to progress into HE ⮚ by 2008, at least 25% per annum to progress to the University of Hull. Generating applications ⮚ from 2006, 2% per annum growth of applications to HE from the Hull and North East Lincolnshire LEAs from 2005 baseline. [These areas have furthest to go in terms of applications to HE]
Milestones and targets. The objectives of the Access Agreement are:
Milestones and targets. 71. The following table shows the full set of our WP milestones and targets, reflecting intended outcomes of work outlined in this document. Targets are unchanged from those approved under our 2017-2018 Access Agreement but are extended to 2021-2022.
Milestones and targets. The introductory section to this document shows that Manchester Metropolitan University is an institution that already performs comfortably above a number of benchmarks that provide indicators of the extent to which its admissions and recruitment activities achieve good social inclusion. Nonetheless, the University will continue to develop targets for its activities that will demonstrate not only its continuing commitment to the recruitment of an appropriately inclusive population of students, but also the progress made by students from target groups relative to those from more traditional backgrounds. It will monitor its performance and check progress against these targets, with some of the data on which these evaluations take place forming part of the information that the University returns regularly to government or funding bodies. For the University to be confident in tracking achievements against its targets and milestones, it is aware that it must continue to build on data sets so that they accurately represent key performance parameters as they develop. It also needs to establish the baselines for new sets of data against which progress will be measured. The first (updated) set of targets below was established in the first Agreement and monitoring against them shall be continued. These are:
Milestones and targets. Table 5a - Statistical milestones and targets relating to your applicants, entrants or student body (e.g. HESA, UCAS or internal targets) Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Baseline year Baseline data Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible, however you may use text) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximium) 7.5% - 3 perform perform perform perform perform year benchmark benchmark benchmark benchmark benchmark To continue, year-on-year, to out- average and obtain a and obtain a and obtain a and obtain a and obtain a perform our benchmark in relation to average of (6.8 7.5% 7.6% 7.7% 7.8% 7.9% the percentage of new entrants from 2007-08 benchmark progression of progression of progression of progression of progression of The baseline figure of 7.5% derives from a three year weighted Low Participation Neighbourhoods 2008-09 in 2009-10) students from students from students from students from students from average. The University already performs significantly better than LPN (HESA Table T1a) and see further progress over time. 2009-10 LPNs. LPNs. LPNs. LPNs. LPNs. xxxxxxxxx and further progress wil be made over time. . To ensure The University of top end of the top end of the top end of the top end of the Manchester is positioned at the top To establish English English English English We will establish a baseline for the proportion of low-income end of the English Xxxxxxx Group in new baseline Xxxxxxx Group Xxxxxxx Group Xxxxxxx Group Xxxxxxx Group students entering Manchester in 2012/13, assess performance the recruitment of low income students in Y1 against and improve and improve and improve and improve against Xxxxxxx Group peer HEIs thereafter and improve Low-income backgrounds and improve performance over time. 2012/13 tbc peer HEIs over time over time over time over time performance over time. average of 2006-07 2007-08 Narrow gap Narrow gap Narrow gap Narrow gap Narrow gap 2009-10 against against against against against To improve performance and narrow (2008-09 21.0% benchmark benchmark benchmark benchmark benchmark In 2009/10 the three year weighted average of recruitment from the gap against benchmark for the % used (three year and obtain and obtain and obtain and obtain and obtain lower socio-economic groups was 21.0% of young full-time of students...
Milestones and targets. Table 5a - Statistical milestones and targets relating to your applicants, entrants or student body (e.g. HESA, UCAS or internal targets) Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Baseline Baseline year data Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible, however you may use text) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximium) Ethnicity Consistently out-perform the national average of the proportion of UG entrants from BME backgrounds 2009/10 entrants 51% white entrants <60% <60% <60% <60% <60% State School (HESA Table T1b) Maintain our current level of UG entrants from State Schools 2009/10 entr 95.10% >95% >95% >95% >95% >95% NS-SEC (HESA Table T1b) Consistently out-perform our benchmark for UG entrants from socio- economic groups 4,5,6 and 7 2009/10 entr 35.10% 35.2% 35.2% 35.2% 35.2% 35.2% Non continuation: All (HESA Table T3a) Consistently meeting the national average rate for non-continuation 2008/09 entr 8.10% 7.9% 7.9% 7.8% 7.7% 7.6% Other (please give details in the next column) Employment - consistently meeting the national average rate for employment 2008/09 Gra 88.40% >90% >90% >90% >90% >90% Annex A: Access agreements for 2012-13: OFFA template for mainstream ITT providers (HEIs and FECs) University of Roehampton Name of institution Please complete this template, and the Excel return at Annex B, and return to us using the HEFCE extranet by 30 March 2012. Where your arrangements are the same as for other courses, we would encourage you to cross-refer to your main agreement wherever possible, rather than seeking to replicate information from that main document here.
Milestones and targets. Table 5a - Statistical milestones and targets relating to your applicants, entrants or student body (e.g. HESA, UCAS or internal targets) Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Baseline Baseline year data Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible, however you may use text) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximium) State School (location adjusted) (HESA Table T1a) From state schools or colleges 2009-2010 94% 94% 94% 95% 95% 95% Currently exceeding location adjusted benchmark NS-SEC (location adjusted) (HESA Table T1b) From NS-SEC 4, 5, 6 7 & 8 2009-2010 32% 32% 32% 33% 33% 33% Stretching target LPN (location adjusted) (HESA Table T1a) neighbourhoods (based on the new POLAR2 method) 2009-2010 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 12% Setting an improvement target Non continuation: All (HESA Table T3a) All entrants 2008-2009 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% 8% Completion rates rising from 91.6 to 92.2% Disabled 11th Annual Baseline data 2009-2010 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% Maintaining double the benchmark position Mature Table 2A Mature FT UG 2008-2009 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% 11% Setting an improvement target Part-time LPN 2008-2009 7% 8% 8% 8% 8% 9% Rise in part time opportunities Care-leavers Care Leavers 2010-2011 0% 0% 0% 1% 1% 1% Setting an improvement target Ethnicity 11th Annual Baseline data 2009-2010 6% 6% 7% 7% 7% 8% Setting an improvement target Other (please give details in the next column) Employability - DHLE Category 1 in Graduate employment 2008-2009 64% 64% 65% 65% 66% 66% Focusing on grad employment destination not all employment andpost grad study Table 5b - Other milestones and targets Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around your outreach work (including collaborative outreach work where appropriate) or other initiatives to illustrate your progress towards increasing access. These should be measurable outcomes‐based targets and should focus on the number of pupils reached by a particular activity/programme, or number of schools worked with, and what the outcomes were, rather than simply recording the nature/number of activities. Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Baseline Baseline year data Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible, however you may use text) 2012-13 2013-14 2...
Milestones and targets. Table 5a - Statistical milestones and targets relating to your applicants, entrants or student body (e.g. HESA, UCAS or internal targets) Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Baseline Baseline year data Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible, however you may use text) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximium) Projected outcomes (HESA table T5) Full-time first degree entrants projected for neither award nor transfer. 2008-9 0.175 0.152 Performance of 2012-13 entrants to meet sector adjusted benchmark in 2015-16 as reflected in 2016 published indicators. Interim milestones will be developed during 2011-12 by the new Retention Working Group. Table 5b - Other milestones and targets Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around your outreach work (including collaborative outreach work where appropriate) or other initiatives to illustrate your progress towards increasing access. These should be measurable outcomes based targets and should focus on the number of pupils reached by a particular activity/programme, or number of schools worked with, and what the outcomes were, rather than simply recording the nature/number of activities. Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Baseline Baseline year data Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible, however you may use text) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximium) Outreach / WP activity (collaborative - please give details in the next column) Number of young people from disadvantaged backgrounds engaged in intensive activity with collaborative partnership using a basket of indicators 2010/11 500 500 750 1000 1000 1000 Birmingham and Solihull HE Progression Partnership is 4 HEIs jointly working with Year 9, 10 and 11 learners in at least 10 local schools in raising awareness of HE progression and to extend fair access. This is a short-term and collective target (see below) Outreach / WP activity (collaborative - please give details in the next column) Proportion of young people from disadvantaged backgrounds in the intensive activity target group on Level 3 programmes at age 17 is greater ...
Milestones and targets. Table 5a - Statistical milestones and targets relating to your applicants, entrants or student body (e.g. HESA, UCAS or internal targets) Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Baseline Baseline year data Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible, however you may use text) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximium) LPN (location adjusted) (HESA Table T1a) 2006/07 0.095 0.114 0.118 0.122 0.126 0.13 LPN (location adjusted) (HESA Table T1b) 2006/07 0.096 0.117 0.121 0.125 0.129 0.133 Mature 2006/07 0.147 0.148 0.152 0.156 0.16 0.164 HESA Table T2a Care-leavers 2010/11 26 20 26 care leavers over 3 year cohorts in 10/11, under 25 years. Over 25s will be included infuture Other (please give details in the next column) Access to He Diploma students 2007/08 280 275 Figure for 07/8 includes NHS students. Target for 12/13 is to award bursaries to those on means tested benefits. Disabled full time students 2006/07 0.039 0.064 0.067 0.07 0.073 0.076 HESA Table T7 Disabled part-time students 2006/07 0.029 0.058 0.061 0.064 0.067 0.07 HESA Table T7 Non continuation: All (HESA Table T3a) see section 4.4 in word document Agreement 2006/7 0.109 0.1 0.095 0.09 0.085 0.08 Table 5b - Other milestones and targets ‐ Alongside applicant and entrant targets, we encourage you to provide targets around your outreach work (including collaborative outreach work where appropriate) or other initiatives to illustrate your progress towards increasing access. These should be measurable outcomes based targets and should focus on the number of pupils reached by a particular activity/programme, or number of schools worked with, and what the outcomes were, rather than simply recording the nature/number of activities. Please select milestone/target type from the drop down menu Description (500 characters maximum) Baseline Baseline year data Yearly milestones/targets (numeric where possible, however you may use text) 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Commentary on your milestones/targets or textual description where numerical description is not appropriate (500 characters maximium) Mission targets Recruitment of students from LPNs is a key strategic objective for UWE. See above. Outreach / WP activity (summer schools) In April 2011 we invited other local universities to collaborate with us for f...
